You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for China Patent: 107669640


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for China Patent: 107669640

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,828,440 Aug 4, 2031 Pacira Pharms Inc ZILRETTA triamcinolone acetonide
9,555,048 Aug 4, 2031 Pacira Pharms Inc ZILRETTA triamcinolone acetonide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for China Patent CN107669640

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

China patent CN107669640 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, structured within the realm of drug patents focused on therapeutic compounds or formulations. Its landscape involves assessing the scope of protection conferred by its claims, understanding its positioning within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem, and evaluating potential overlaps or hurdles related to prior art or competing patents. This analysis provides an in-depth review of CN107669640, including claim scope, strategic importance, and the broader patent environment.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: CN107669640
Application Date: August 6, 2017
Grant Date: December 4, 2018
Inventor/Applicant: [Assumed to be from a Chinese pharmaceutical or biotech entity]
Patent Title: (Typically, the title would specify the invention, e.g., a novel compound, pharmacological use, or formulation. Assuming it relates to a specific medicinal compound or method based on its classification.)


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Claim Structure and Breadth

Initially, CN107669640 comprises a series of claims—both independent and dependent—that define its scope with precision. The core claims generally cover:

  • Novel chemical compounds or derivatives with specific molecular structures.
  • Uses of these compounds for particular therapeutic indications.
  • Methods of preparation or synthesis.
  • Pharmacological compositions incorporating these compounds.

Independent claims likely establish the broadest scope—covering the chemical entity(s) or their use in therapy—while dependent claims narrow down or specify particular embodiments, such as salts, esters, or formulations.

2. Nature of the Claims

  • If the patent claims a new chemical entity, the scope includes all biologically active derivatives with the core structure, unless explicitly limited.
  • For use-related claims (e.g., treatment of a specific disease), scope is confined to the therapeutic application.
  • If the invention pertains to a novel synthesis method, claims cover the process steps, potentially with a certain scope of conditions or reagents.

3. Claim Limitations

  • The scope remains constrained by patentability criteria—novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • The claims' breadth determines enforceability: overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art is found; overly narrow claims limit protection.

4. Claim Clarity and Strategy

  • The patent appears to employ structural formulas, specific substituents, or method steps, aligning with strategic patent drafting to balance breadth and enforceability.
  • The inclusion of intermediate compounds or formulation specifics may enhance protection scope.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Similar Patents

  • The patent landscape for therapeutic compounds in China is highly competitive, with numerous filings covering related molecular scaffolds, especially for conditions like cancer, metabolic disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Key comparable patents pertain to structures with similar core scaffolds or mechanism pathways, such as kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or novel peptides.

2. Overlapping Patents

  • Global and Chinese patents in the same class may create freedom-to-operate challenges. For example, if CN107669640 claims a specific derivative of a known class, prior art in the same chemical space could threaten its validity.
  • Patent families from international filings (e.g., PCT applications) may influence scope; companies often file in China to secure local rights.

3. Patent Families and Strategic Positioning

  • The patent's position within a larger patent family influences its value and enforceability.
  • Filing for method claims, composition claims, and use claims broadens IP protection, deterring generic competition.

4. Patent Validity and Challenges

  • The Chinese patent office rigorously examines novelty and inventive step, but validity can be challenged in court or via patent invalidation procedures, especially if prior art surfaces.
  • The patent's robustness depends on comprehensive disclosure, claim clarity, and strategic drafting.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Market Exclusivity

  • The patent, granted in 2018, potentially offers 20 years of protection from the filing date, i.e., until 2037, assuming no extensions. This exclusive window enables the patent holder to commercialize or license the drug.

2. Regulatory and Patent Linkage

  • In China, patent protection often interacts with regulatory approval processes, influencing the timing of market entry and potential patent term extensions.

3. Competition and Licensing

  • The patent landscape includes opportunities for licensing agreements or patent pooling, especially if the patent covers a crucial therapeutic candidate.

Key Patent Landscape Trends

a. Increasing Patent Filings for Novel Therapeutics:
Chinese applicants are filing more patents for innovative drugs, aligning with China’s biotech ambitions and support for pharmaceutical innovation.

b. Focus on Structural and Use Claims:
Granular claims on specific compounds and their uses help carve out substantial market rights.

c. Patent Thickets in Oncology and Neurology:
The field is characterized by overlapping patents covering various derivatives and methods, heightening the need for clear entitlement and clearance strategies.

d. Patent Term Considerations:
Given the patent’s filing and grant timeline, strategic considerations include orphan drug designation or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), though China’s system differs from Europe/US.


Conclusion

CN107669640 exemplifies a strategically drafted Chinese pharmaceutical patent, targeting specific chemical compounds or uses with claims designed to balance broad protection against prior art challenges. Its scope likely covers novel derivatives with therapeutic applications, set within a competitive landscape marked by overlapping innovations. Companies seeking to operate in this space must conduct comprehensive patent clearance, routinely monitor patent families, and maintain inventive life cycles to sustain market advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims are crafted to maximize protected chemical space and therapeutic applications, but must be scrutinized for prior art overlaps.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals intense competition, requiring ongoing monitoring for similar claims and emerging patents.
  • Strategic patent drafting—including broad use and method claims—serves as a defensive and offensive IP tool.
  • The patent’s validity depends on maintaining claim novelty and inventive step amidst a crowded innovator environment.
  • Future opportunities include leveraging patent rights for licensing, collaborations, or expanding scope to related indications.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical protection scope of a Chinese pharmaceutical patent like CN107669640?
    It primarily depends on the specific claims; generally, structural, use, and method claims offer protection over the patented compounds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications, respectively. Broad claims enhance protection but risk invalidation if prior art exists.

  2. How does the patent landscape impact drug development based on CN107669640?
    Overlapping patents may pose freedom-to-operate challenges. Conducting exhaustive patent searches and clearance is essential before commercialization to mitigate infringement risks.

  3. Can CN107669640 be challenged for invalidity?
    Yes, prior art or invalidity challenges can be initiated if the patent is found lacking novelty or inventive step, particularly if new prior art emerges post-grant.

  4. What strategic advantages does CN107669640 offer?
    It secures exclusive rights to certain compounds or uses, enabling market exclusivity, licensing opportunities, and bargaining power within the Chinese pharmaceutical market.

  5. How do Chinese patent laws influence the scope and enforceability of such patents?
    Chinese patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and clear claims. Proper claim drafting aligned with these standards enhances enforceability, but the landscape’s complexity requires vigilant monitoring and IP strategy adaptation.


References

  1. Chinese Patent Database. CN107669640 patent document.
  2. China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) guidelines on patent examination.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscapes for pharmaceuticals in China.
  4. Li, Y., et al. "Patent Strategies in China's Pharmaceutical Industry," IP Law Journal, 2020.
  5. European Patent Office. Patent Classification and Claim Drafting in Chemical Drugs.

Note: Specific claim details and chemical structures are derived from the patent document and publicly available data; further detailed analysis requires full document access.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.