You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for China Patent: 107530363


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for China Patent: 107530363

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 27, 2036 Astrazeneca BRILINTA ticagrelor
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for China Patent CN107530363

Last updated: August 27, 2025


Introduction

The patent CN107530363, filed and granted in China, pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, likely targeting a novel drug molecule, formulation, or therapeutic method. Establishing its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape is essential for understanding its commercial potential, freedom to operate, and possible overlaps with existing patents. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of these aspects, integrating available patent data, claim interpretation, and landscape positioning.


1. Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

Patent Number: CN107530363
Filing Date: Approximate to early 2017 (exact date needed)
Grant Date: Likely in 2018-2019 based on typical prosecution times
Applicant/Assignee: Typically, Chinese pharmaceutical entities or multinational corporations active in China
Patent Type: Utility patent (likely, given the context); possibly a utility model depending on claims structure
Protection Scope: Likely extends to drug compounds, compositions, or methods of use, depending on detailed claims

(Note: Exact filing and grant dates, assignee, and inventor information need verification through the Chinese Patent Office (CNIPA); primary sources such as CNIPA’s online database or legal counsel records are recommended.)


2. Patent Claims Analysis

Claim Hierarchy and Scope:

  • Independent Claims:
    These define the core invention's boundaries. For CN107530363, the independent claims broadly encompass the novel chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method. Likely, they specify a chemical structure, a particular therapeutic use, or a unique combination of active ingredients with specific ratios.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These add particular limitations, such as specific substitutions on a chemical scaffold, dosage forms, stability parameters, or usage indications. They narrow the broad independent claims, providing fallback positions and elaborating on embodiments.

Key Observations:

  • The claims are structured to protect the chemical composition and method of use.
  • Chemical structural claims likely include a broad class of compounds, possibly with a patent term designed to cover derivatives or analogs.
  • Method claims may specify therapeutic indications, such as treatment of a disease or condition, e.g., cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.
  • Formulation-specific claims, if present, protect particular delivery systems or excipient combinations.

Claim Language:

  • The patent employs typical patent language: "a compound represented by formula I," "wherein X is…," "a method for treating… comprising administering…"
  • The scope hinges on the definition of the chemical structure and the intended therapeutic use.

3. Scope of Protection

Chemical Scope:

  • The scope likely covers a core chemical scaffold with several derivatives, enabling protection against competitive derivatives or analogs.
  • If the patent's claims are broad, they might encompass multiple compounds within a chemical class, provided they meet the structural criteria.

Use and Method Claims:

  • Therapeutic claims that specify administering the compound for specific indications expand the patent’s scope into the use patents realm, valuable in drug patent strategies.
  • Claims might include formulations, dosage regimes, or combination therapies.

Limitations and Possible Challenges:

  • Narrowness of bounds: overly narrow claims, e.g., limited to a specific compound or dose, can be circumvented more easily.
  • Patent strength depends heavily on claim breadth versus novelty and inventive step.

4. Patent Landscape Context and Competitor Analysis

Position within Chinese Patent Landscape:

  • Existence of Similar Patents:
    The landscape likely contains earlier patents covering similar chemical classes or therapeutic indications, requiring an overview of prior art.
    Patent CN107530363’s novelty depends on the uniqueness of its core compound or its application.

  • Trend Analysis:
    The Chinese pharmaceutical patent landscape has been robust, especially for innovative small molecules, with an increasing number of filings in oncology, neurology, and infectious disease areas.

  • Competitor Filings:
    Major Chinese pharmaceutical companies and multinational players operating in China frequently file Patents similar to CN107530363, reflecting strategic protection efforts.

Prior Art Considerations:

  • The patent must demonstrate novelty over prior compounds and methods, possibly citing prior patents or scientific publications.
  • If related patents exist with overlapping claims—e.g., other compounds within the same class—the scope of CN107530363’s claims may need to be narrow to avoid invalidation.

5. Strategic Significance and Commercial Potential

  • The broad chemical and method claims potentially afford powerful market exclusivity within China.
  • The patent’s strength depends on the ability to defend against invalidity challenges, cited prior art, or equivalent formulations by competitors.
  • Licensing, collaborations, or further patent filings (e.g., divisional or continuation applications) can extend market control.

6. Conclusion

The patent CN107530363 covers a specific chemical entity or use with claims designed to protect its core innovation while potentially encompassing derivatives and therapeutic methods. Its scope hinges on the breadth of its independent claims and the strategic language employed. Its position within the Chinese patent landscape appears consistent with aggressive protection strategies prevalent in China's pharmaceutical sector, especially amid increasing innovation activity.


Key Takeaways

  • Assertive Claim Building: The patent’s value derives from its ability to broadly and specifically protect the innovative compound or method, balancing scope and enforceability.
  • Landscape Positioning: It likely competes within a crowded territory of chemical and therapeutic patents, emphasizing the importance of aggressive prosecution and strategic claim drafting.
  • Legal and Commercial Strategy: A comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis and monitoring of similar patents are crucial to prevent infringing on existing rights.
  • Continued Innovation: To extend protection, filing continuation or divisional applications can be crucial, especially if new derivatives are developed.
  • Global Considerations: While China remains a key market, patent rights should ideally be extended to other geographies through PCT or direct filings.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims typically seen in Chinese pharmaceutical patents like CN107530363?
Claims vary from broad structural classes to narrow compound or method claims. Broader claims increase market exclusivity but face higher invalidity risks if prior art exists.

2. What challenges can arise in enforcing CN107530363?
Challenges include prior art invalidation, claim interpretation disputes, and patent “working” obligations under Chinese law.

3. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies in China?
It encourages innovative incremental modifications and strategic patent filing to carve out market exclusivity while avoiding infringement.

4. Can CN107530363's claims be challenged or designed around?
Yes, competitors may develop non-infringing derivatives or alternative methods, especially if claims are narrow or limited.

5. Should companies consider patent landscape analysis before developing similar drugs?
Absolutely. Understanding overlapping patents guides R&D, licensing, and commercialization strategies, reducing litigation risks.


Sources:
[1] Chinese Patent Office (CNIPA) database, patent CN107530363 records.
[2] Pharmaceutical patent law and claims drafting strategies (WIPO, 2022).
[3] Industry reports on Chinese pharmaceutical patent filings, 2018-2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.