You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Chile Patent: 2023000693


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Chile Patent: 2023000693

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,281,113 Sep 10, 2041 Bristol KRAZATI adagrasib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Chile Patent CL2023000693

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Patent CL2023000693, granted in Chile, exemplifies the country’s evolving approach to pharmaceutical patent protection. This analysis aims to delineate the scope of the patent, scrutinize its claims, and contextualize its position within the current patent landscape for pharmaceuticals in Chile. Understanding these facets is critical for industry stakeholders, including generic manufacturers, patent attorneys, and R&D firms, to navigate Chile’s intellectual property environment effectively.

Background and Patent Overview

Chile's patent system is governed by Law No. 19,039, aligned with the TRIPS Agreement, providing a framework for patent protection across various technological fields, including pharmaceuticals. The Chilean INAPI (National Institute of Industrial Property) administers patents, of which pharmaceutical patents often face unique challenges concerning inventive step, novelty, and clarity of claims.

Patent CL2023000693 appears to address a specific novel pharmaceutical compound or a novel use of an existing compound, though detailed claims require scrutiny to understand the extent of protection conferred. The patent’s filing date, priority date, and expiry date, important for assessing patent term and enforceability, are essential but require explicit mention from official documents.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Types of Claims

In pharmaceutical patents, claims generally fall into two categories:

  • Product Claims: Cover the chemical entity or pharmaceutical composition itself.
  • Method or Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic methods or indications.

Preliminary examination suggests CL2023000693 includes both types, with a primary focus on a novel chemical compound, possibly accompanied by medical use claims.

Claim Clarity and Breadth

  1. Claim Language
    The claims employ technical, precise terminology consistent with patent standards. The broadness of these claims primarily depends on the scope of the inventive features disclosed.

  2. Novelty and Inventive Step
    The claims likely delineate a specific chemical structure or a unique therapeutic formulation, differing from prior art in terms of molecular configuration, method of synthesis, or therapeutic application. For Chile, the utility and non-obviousness are key for patent validity.

  3. Scope of Protection
    The scope appears to be focused, with claims potentially narrowing the scope to a specific compound or subclass. Broad claims covering generic structures or methods may face challenges unless well-supported by inventive step analysis.

Claim Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • Overly Broad Claims: Risk of invalidation if claims are not adequately supported by inventive step or lack novelty.
  • Dependent Claims: Often used in pharmaceutical patents to add specificity, thereby strengthening overall patent protection.
  • Potential for Patent Linkage and Litigation: Given Chile’s adherence to international patent standards, claims covering key active compounds can lead to litigation or licensing negotiations.

Patent Landscape in Chile for Pharmaceuticals

Current Trends and Practices

Chile’s pharmaceutical patent landscape increasingly aligns with international standards, emphasizing robust examinations for novelty and inventive step (e.g., recent patent applications in the sector). The landscape is characterized by:

  • Increasing Number of Pharmaceutical Patents: Reflects growing R&D investments.
  • Focus on Therapeutic Use and Formulation Patents: Beyond compounds, method patents are prevalent.
  • Challenges in Patentability of Second-Uses and Formulations: Similar to other jurisdictions, secondary patents must demonstrate significant inventive advancements.

Key Patent Cases and Precedents

While Chile has historically been more permissive with patentability, recent jurisprudence shows a trend towards stricter scrutiny, especially concerning secondary patents and obvious modifications. Patent applications like CL2023000693 are evaluated based on:

  • Novelty: No identical prior art.
  • Inventive Step: Not obvious to a skilled person.
  • Utility: Demonstrates industrial applicability.

Competitive Landscape

Major pharmaceutical companies, alongside local biotech firms, have patent portfolios in Chile. Patents similar to CL2023000693 guard core intellectual assets for novel compounds and formulations, often serving as a basis for market exclusivity and licensing.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Must ensure claims are meticulously drafted to maximize scope without risking invalidation.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Should monitor patent claims to assess potential infringement or blocking patents.
  • Legal & Regulatory Bodies: Need to balance patent rights with public health interests, especially in a market with increasing access to essential medicines.

Conclusion

Patent CL2023000693 appears to encapsulate a strategically focused patent designed to protect a novel pharmaceutical compound or use. Its scope likely balances enforceability with innovation, fitting within Chile’s evolving patent ecosystem. Stakeholders should scrutinize the specific claims for strength and vulnerabilities, considering Chile’s increasing rigor in patent examination and recent legal developments.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise Claim Drafting Is Critical: Claims must be sufficiently broad to protect core inventions but narrow enough to withstand novelty and inventive step challenges.
  • Patent Landscape Expansion: Chile’s pharmaceutical patent filings are on the rise, reflecting increased R&D activity.
  • Legal Scrutiny Is Intensifying: Patent examiners increasingly scrutinize secondary claims for inventive step, underscoring the importance of comprehensive patent prosecution.
  • Proactive Monitoring Essential: Companies should monitor patent filings and grants to mitigate infringement risks and capitalize on licensing opportunities.
  • Regulatory and Patent Synergy: Good coordination between patent prosecution and regulatory strategies enhances market exclusivity prospects.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main considerations for drafting claims in Chile pharmaceutical patents like CL2023000693?
A: Claims should clearly define novel chemical structures or therapeutic methods, balancing breadth with support to ensure validity under Chilean law. Clarity, inventive step, and supported utility are critical.

Q2: Can secondary uses of existing drugs be patented in Chile?
A: Yes, provided they demonstrate a significant inventive step and industrial applicability. However, these patents are scrutinized closely for obviousness.

Q3: How does Chile's patent system handle patent disputes in pharmaceuticals?
A: Disputes are resolved through administrative proceedings or courts, with emphasis on patent validity based on novelty, inventive step, and utility.

Q4: What is the impact of Chile’s patent landscape on generic drug producers?
A: A robust patent landscape may delay entry but also presents opportunities for licensing agreements. Monitoring patents like CL2023000693 helps avoid infringement.

Q5: How does Chile align with international standards for pharmaceutical patents?
A: Chile's patent laws and examination practices are aligned with TRIPS commitments, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and utility, similar to other jurisdictions.


Sources:

  1. INAPI Official Database – General procedural standards and patent classifications.
  2. Law No. 19,039 – Chilean patent law governing pharmaceutical patentability.
  3. WIPO Patent Search – Comparative analysis of patent landscapes across jurisdictions.
  4. Recent Chilean Patent Decisions – Judicial and administrative rulings on pharmaceutical patent validity.
  5. Industry Reports – Trend analysis of pharmaceutical patent filings in Chile.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available information and general legal principles. For specific legal advice, consult a registered patent attorney familiar with Chilean patent law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.