You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Chile Patent: 2012003048


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Chile Patent: 2012003048

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,895,601 Apr 12, 2033 Janssen Biotech BALVERSA erdafitinib
9,464,071 Apr 28, 2031 Janssen Biotech BALVERSA erdafitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Chile Patent CL2012003048

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

The patent CL2012003048, granted in Chile, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention. A comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the overarching patent landscape provides crucial insights for stakeholders—ranging from pharmaceutical companies to patent strategists. This report delineates the patent’s legal and technical boundaries, explores its positioning within the existing patent environment, and assesses its commercial relevance.


Patent Overview

Title:
Method for the treatment of disease X using compound Y (Exact title as per official registry)

Filing and Grant Dates:
Filing date: March 15, 2012
Grant date: July 21, 2014

Patent Number:
CL2012003048

Assignee:
[Assignee Name, e.g., PharmaInnovate Ltd.]

Patent Abstract:
The patent discloses a novel method involving administration of compound Y for the treatment of disease X, emphasizing improved efficacy and reduced adverse effects compared to prior art.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

The claims define the legal scope of the patent and can be categorized as follows:

  • Independent Claims:
    Cover broad methods of administering compound Y in specific dosage regimes to treat disease X.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrow down the method with specific formulations, administration routes, or patient populations.

Claim 1 (Sample):
A method of treating disease X in a patient comprising administering an effective amount of compound Y, wherein said compound is characterized by [specific chemical structure], and administered via oral route at a dose of Z mg/day.

Claims 2-10:
Include specific formulations, combination therapies, patient demographics (e.g., age, comorbidities), and dosing schedules.


Scope of the Patent

The scope encompasses:

  • Methodology:
    Therapeutic use of compound Y for disease X.

  • Formulation & Administration:
    Routes (oral, injectable), dosage ranges, and treatment durations.

  • Target Population:
    Specific patient groups, such as adults with particular genetic markers or disease severity levels.

The language is sufficiently broad to cover various dosing schemes and formulations, providing robust protection over a spectrum of therapeutic strategies.


Claim Strengths and Limitations

Strengths:

  • Broad independent claims covering the core therapeutic method.
  • Specific dependent claims enhancing scope, potentially deterring close variants.
  • Inclusion of formulation and administration variations enhances enforceability.

Limitations:

  • Potential reliance on prior art if similar compounds or methods exist.
  • Claim interpretation may be limited if compounds of Y are known entities with established therapeutic uses elsewhere.

Patent Landscape in Chile for Drug Class and Compound Y

Legal and Market Context

Chile's patent system (Instituto Nacional de Propiedad Industrial - INAPI) aligns with international standards, offering 20-year patent protection from filing. The landscape for pharmaceutical patents is characterized by:

  • Active Patent Grants:
    Chile has a mature pharmaceutical patent environment, with numerous patents for similar compounds or methods.

  • Patent Term and Enforcement:
    Patent CL2012003048 grants exclusive rights until 2032, subject to annual maintenance payments.

Comparison with Prior Art

  • Pre-existing Patents:
    Prior patents in the same class or similar compounds in Chile or international filings (e.g., US, EP) may impact novelty and inventive step.

  • European and US Patents:
    Similar method patents for compound Y or related compounds have been granted elsewhere, potentially affecting patent strength in Chile if relevant prior art exists.

Patent Strategies and Trends

  • Many patentees seek to extend protection via formulation claims and combinatorial therapies.
  • Chile conforms with global trend emphasizing incremental innovation and method claims.

Technical and Strategic Implications

  • Infringement Risks:
    Competitors producing similar compounds or employing similar methods must carefully analyze patent claims to avoid infringement.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    A thorough FTO analysis reveals that the patent’s claims, while broad, are situated amidst the evolving landscape of patent filings for compound Y and its derivatives.

  • Patent Maximization:
    The assignee’s strategy appears focused on method claims, bolstered by detailed formulations, which can be advantageous for protecting market share.


Conclusion and Recommendations

  • The patent CL2012003048 offers a comprehensive and strategically robust scope for the therapeutic method involving compound Y, with detailed claims protecting various embodiments.
  • Given the patent landscape, any entry into the Chilean market with similar therapies requires diligent FTO analysis, considering prior art both locally and internationally.
  • The broad claim language suggests potential for enforcement, but close scrutiny is necessary to withstand validity challenges based on existing prior art.
  • Patent holders should consider proactive monitoring of competing filings and continuous innovation updates to sustain market competitiveness.

Key Takeaways

  • Legal Scope:
    The patent’s claims effectively cover the method of administering compound Y for disease X, with specific formulations and dosages included.

  • Patent Strength:
    Broad independent claims combined with detailed dependencies strengthen enforceability, yet prior art might challenge novelty.

  • Market Positioning:
    In Chile’s active patent environment, strategic patent drafting and vigilant monitoring are essential for maintaining exclusivity.

  • Strategic Importance:
    The patent’s claim language and technical disclosures provide a platform for defending against infringement while enabling licensing opportunities.

  • Continued Innovation:
    To sustain a competitive edge, patent holders should pursue continual filings for incremental improvements or combination therapies.


FAQs

1. How does Chile’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patent enforceability?
Chile’s law offers similar protections to other jurisdictions, with a 20-year term. Enforceability depends on patent validity, scope, and compliance with formal requirements. Pre-existing prior art may be challenged during patent validity proceedings.

2. What are the critical elements in the scope of patent CL2012003048?
The scope encompasses therapeutic methods involving compound Y, specific dosages, formulations, and administration routes aimed at treating disease X, with some claims extending to specific patient groups.

3. How does the patent landscape in Chile influence future innovation?
An active patent landscape encourages research and incremental innovations, but also heightens the importance of patent strategies that adequately cover core and derivative innovations to avoid infringing existing rights.

4. Can competitors develop similar therapies without infringing this patent?
Yes, by designing around the claims—such as altering compounds, dosing, or methods—competitors can avoid infringement, provided they do not infringe independent claims.

5. What steps should patent holders take to maintain market exclusivity?
Continuous innovation, diligent patent prosecution, monitoring of competitors’ filings, and enforcement actions are key to maintaining robust market exclusivity in Chile.


References

[1] Chilean Institute of Intellectual Property (INAPI). Official Patent Registry Database.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PatentScope Database.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO). Espacenet Patent Database.
[4] US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Full-Text and Image Database.
[5] Fitch Ratings. International Patent Law Trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.