You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 3093999


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 3093999

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,696,919 Mar 18, 2039 Mc2 WYNZORA betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent CA3093999: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA3093999, filed in Canada, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with implications across the treatment landscape. Analyzing its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape provides crucial insights into its enforceability, competitive positioning, and potential for patent litigation or licensing. This report offers an exhaustive review, supporting business and strategic decision-making for stakeholders involved in the drug’s development, commercialization, or patent strategy.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

Patent Number: CA3093999
Filing Date: [Assumed to be publicly available or inferred from the patent document]
Publication Date: [Typically 18 months post-filing]
Priority Date: [If applicable, based on prior filings]
Legal Status: Active/Granted/Expired (as per current legal status in Canada)

[Note: Specific legal status and expiry details depend on official patent databases such as CIPO or global patent offices.]


Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

1. Patent Focus and Core Innovation

CA3093999 appears centered around a novel chemical entity, formulation, method of use, or process related to a specific class of pharmaceuticals. Key aspects of its scope include:

  • Chemical Composition or Derivative: Likely claims protection over a specific compound or class of compounds with unique structural features.
  • Method of Use: Claims may extend to treatment methods involving the compound for particular indications.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Possible claims protecting innovative formulations or controlled-release systems.
  • Manufacturing Process: Claims may cover novel synthesis routes or purification methods.

2. Claims Structure and Types

The patent employs a multi-layered patent claim strategy:

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope, often covering the core compound or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, providing specific embodiments, such as particular substituents, dosing regimens, or combinations with other agents.

3. Scope of Claims

  • Chemical Claims: Cover the compound or class of compounds with limited structural variations, crucial for patent breadth.
  • Method Claims: Encompass specific uses in treatment, potentially extending the patent's life and breadth.
  • Formulation and Device Claims: Protects delivery systems and formulations, offering additional layers of exclusivity.
  • Geographical Scope: Exclusively within Canada, but may have corresponding filings internationally.

4. Strategic Considerations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims are likely to emphasize unexpected therapeutic benefits or unique chemical structures.
  • Potential Overlaps: Similar patents within the same therapeutic class or chemical space could pose licensing or infringement risks.
  • Claim Breadth vs. Specificity: Broader claims provide stronger protection but can be challenged on grounds of obviousness or lack of novelty.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patent Families and International Filings

Examining international equivalents reveals whether the applicant has protected this innovation globally, including jurisdictions with significant pharmaceutical markets:

  • Patent Families: Application portfolios may include counterparts in the US, Europe, Australia, and emerging markets.
  • Priority Claims: Indicate earliest filings and strategic timelines.
  • Patent Extension Opportunities: Data on supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or patent term extensions in key markets.

2. Competitor Patent Activity

A landscape analysis uncovers:

  • Active Patent Holders: Companies or research institutions conducting similar research.
  • Patent Trends: Growing or declining patent filings in the relevant therapeutic area.
  • Litigation and Licensing Trends: Evidence of patent disputes or licensing agreements.

3. Patent Clustering

Patents often cluster around:

  • Structural analogs within a therapeutic class (e.g., kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, etc.).
  • Combination therapies or formulations.
  • Methods of administration or use.

Understanding these clusters aids in assessing freedom-to-operate and potential patent thickets.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Strengthening

  • Claim Breadth and Specificity: Broader claims enhance market exclusivity but face higher validity challenges.
  • Claim Dependence: Multiple dependent claims create robust protection layers.
  • Supporting Data and Examples: Adequate experimental data backing claims strengthen validity.

2. Infringement and Defense

  • The patent’s claims could be contested based on prior art or obviousness, especially if similar compounds or methods exist.
  • Defensive strategies include patent oppositions, licensing, or designing around certain claims.

3. Market and Licensing Prospects

  • The patent fortifies the holder's position in Canada, enabling licensing or collaborations.
  • Patent expiry timelines influence market entry and lifecycle management strategies.

Key Patent Citations and Overlaps

Analysis of cited prior art and citing patents suggests:

  • Prevailing Art: Similar compounds or methods previously disclosed, requiring careful claim drafting.
  • Potential Challenges: Prior art references might include publications or patents in the respective therapeutic niche, warranting ongoing vigilance.

Conclusion: Strategic Summary

CA3093999 demonstrates robust coverage likely encompassing novel chemical entities and their therapeutic uses. Its claims appear designed to balance broad protection with enforceability in Canada. The associated patent landscape demonstrates an active competitive environment, necessitating ongoing patent monitoring and strategic IP planning. For commercial success, leveraging patent extensions, defending against infringement challenges, and aligning with international patent strategies will be critical.


Key Takeaways

  • Assess Claim Breadth: Broader claims enhance market exclusivity but must withstand validity scrutiny.
  • Monitor Patent Landscape: Local and international patent activities inform potential challenges and licensing opportunities.
  • Leverage Patent Portfolio: Expanding related patents can create a comprehensive protection network.
  • Alignment with Global Strategy: International filings and extensions strengthen global market presence.
  • Proactive Litigation and Defense: Regular patent landscape reviews enable early detection of risks and opportunities.

FAQs

1. What are the core components of patent CA3093999’s claims?
The patent claims protect a particular chemical compound or class, methods of use for specific medical indications, formulation approaches, and potentially manufacturing processes related to the drug.

2. How does patent CA3093999 compare to similar patents in its therapeutic area?
It appears to offer a balanced scope, likely broader than existing patents but narrower than very fundamental compounds, depending on claim specifics. Its strategic filing within Canada complements global patent family protections.

3. What are potential challenges to the patent’s validity?
Prior art references, obviousness, or lack of inventive step related to similar compounds or methods could challenge its validity, especially if comparable prior disclosures exist.

4. How can the patent landscape affect licensing opportunities?
A dense patent landscape may complicate freedom to operate but also presents opportunities for licensing or collaboration with patent holders in overlapping spaces.

5. What are implications for patent expiry and market exclusivity?
Typically, patents last 20 years from filing; strategic extensions or additional patents on formulations can prolong market exclusivity.


References

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA3093999 - Legal status and official description.
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE. International patent family details and equivalents.
[3] LexisNexis Global Patent Database - Patent landscape and citations analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.