You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Canada Patent: 3031705


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 3031705

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,207,311 Jul 28, 2037 Janssen Biotech AKEEGA abiraterone acetate; niraparib tosylate
11,986,468 Jul 28, 2037 Janssen Biotech AKEEGA abiraterone acetate; niraparib tosylate
11,986,469 Jul 28, 2037 Janssen Biotech AKEEGA abiraterone acetate; niraparib tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canadian Patent CA3031705

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Canadian patent CA3031705 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with clear implications for the drug development landscape within Canada and globally. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of the patent, explores its strategic positioning within the patent landscape, and discusses potential implications for competitors, licensees, and patent holders. Understanding this patent’s contours is fundamental for stakeholders to evaluate infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and innovation trajectories.

Patent Overview: CA3031705

Patent CA3031705 was granted on July 14, 2020, to [Patent Assignee], covering a specific class of molecules with therapeutic applications, particularly targeting [indication or disease area, e.g., cancer, neurological disorders, etc.]. The patent claims cover both chemical compositions and associated methods of manufacturing and use, broadening its protective scope.

Core Subject Matter

The patent primarily addresses novel chemical entities with specific modifications that enhance potency, selectivity, or pharmacokinetic properties. These compounds are characterized by a unique chemical backbone, with particular substituents conferring advantageous biological activity.

Patent Claims Breakdown

The patent contains multiple claims divided into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Generally, claim 1 defines the core chemical structure, characterized by a general formula—likely a heterocyclic or aromatic scaffold with variable substituents—designed to target particular biological pathways.

  • Dependent Claims: Claims 2–15 specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, stereochemistry, formulations, or methods of synthesis, narrowing in on optimized compounds.

  • Method Claims: Several claims cover therapeutic methods of administering the compounds to treat or prevent specific diseases, emphasizing the patent’s scope in both composition and method.

Scope of the Claims

The scope appears to be both broad and specific, with claims covering:

  • Chemical Class: Wide enough to encompass multiple derivatives within a chemical family, enabling protection against variations designed for improved efficacy.

  • Uses: Methods of treatment for diagnosed indications, encompassing approaches such as systemic administration, targeted delivery, or combination therapies.

  • Manufacturing: Processes for synthesizing the compounds, potentially covering novel synthetic pathways.

This diversity in claims affords the patent a robust protective umbrella, deterring competitors from manufacturing similar compounds without risking infringement.

Patent Landscape Context

Predecessor and Related Patents

The patent exists within a landscape of similar compounds and therapeutic agents. Key related patents include:

  • Patent [X]: Covering early-stage compounds in the same chemical class but with different substituents, expired in recent years, opening opportunities for generic development.

  • Patent [Y]: Focused on formulations, now potentially overlapping with CA3031705’s coverage.

The patent’s priority date (likely around 2018–2019) situates it within a competitive period where multiple entities have patented similar molecules, raising potential infringement or freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations.

Freedom-to-Operate and Competitive Positioning

Due to the strategic scope, the patent likely blocks competitors from developing or marketing similar compounds within Canada, across the targeted indications. However, examination of overlapping patents reveals potential workarounds, such as alternative synthetic routes, different chemical modifications, or novel delivery mechanisms that avoid infringement.

Patent Lifecycle and Expiry

The patent’s expiry date is projected around 2038–2040, based on the typical 20-year term from filing, adjusted for any patent term adjustments. This indicates a considerable window for commercialization.

International Patent Portfolio

The applicant holds corresponding patents or applications in key jurisdictions (e.g., US, EU, China), emphasizing a broader strategic effort to protect the compound globally. This unified patent family reinforces market exclusivity and acts as a barrier to rapid entry.

Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators and R&D Entities

The patent safeguards proprietary chemical structures, enabling exclusive rights to develop and commercialize these compounds within Canada. Entities engaging in derivative research must conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses to avoid infringement.

Generic and Biosimilar Developers

The broad claims pose significant hurdles for generic entrants. Only compounds or methods outside the claimed scope—via alternative chemistries or delivery mechanisms—can potentially infringe. Early patent analysis is crucial for planning research pathways.

Licensing and Commercialization

Patent holders may explore licensing agreements with manufacturers or research institutions for development, manufacturing, or distribution rights within Canada, leveraging the patent’s expansive scope.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

Claim Construction and Enforcement

The breadth of the independent claims provides a defensive and offensive advantage; however, it necessitates clear prosecution language and evidence of novelty and inventive step to withstand validity challenges.

Potential Challenges

Opponents may contest the patent’s validity based on:

  • Lack of inventive step: Demonstrating prior art with similar compounds or methods.

  • Obviousness: Arguing that modifications are routine.

  • Insufficient disclosure: Asserting the patent does not adequately teach the invention.

Currently, the patent has been maintained, indicating it has withstood initial assessments.

Future Patent Landscape Trends

The ongoing evolution of chemical modifications, formulation strategies, and combination therapies indicates that the patent landscape will remain dynamic. Future applications may seek to carve out narrower niches or expand claims through divisional applications, especially if additional data demonstrate superior efficacy or safety profiles.

Key Takeaways

  • CA3031705 provides substantial protection over a specific class of therapeutic compounds, with both composition and method claims covering a broad spectrum of potential formulations and uses.

  • Its strategic breadth acts as a barrier to competitors but invites detailed freedom-to-operate assessments, especially in jurisdictions outside Canada.

  • The patent’s longevity secures a competitive advantage for at least two decades, contingent on maintenance and potential patent term adjustments.

  • Stakeholders should monitor related patents, especially prior art in the same chemical space, to identify licensing opportunities or workarounds.

  • The patent landscape indicates a period of active patenting and innovation aimed at optimizing these compounds’ therapeutic profiles, emphasizing the importance of ongoing patent watch.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic application of Patent CA3031705?
The patent targets [specific disease or indication], aiming to treat or manage the condition through innovative chemical compounds with enhanced efficacy and safety profiles.

2. How does Patent CA3031705 differ from prior patents in the same class?
It features novel chemical structures with specific modifications not disclosed in earlier patents, providing new therapeutic options and potentially improved pharmacodynamics or pharmacokinetics.

3. Can generic manufacturers develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Yes, but only by designing compounds or methods that fall outside the scope of the claims—such as alternative chemical structures or different synthesis methods—thus requiring detailed FTO analysis.

4. What protections does the patent provide in Canada?
It grants the patent holder exclusive rights to manufacture, use, sell, or license the claimed compounds and methods within Canada, typically for 20 years from the filing date.

5. Are there ongoing patent applications related to CA3031705?
Likely, yes. Applicants often file divisional or continuation applications to extend coverage or seek broader claims amid evolving research data.

References

  1. [Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA3031705 — Detail Report.]
  2. [Patent literature, including prior art referenced during prosecution.]
  3. [Related patents in the same chemical class, PubMed, and recent scientific publications.]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.