You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 3008756


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 3008756

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 30, 2036 Mayne Pharma LEXETTE halobetasol propionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA3008756

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA3008756, titled "Method for Treating Osteoporosis with Calcitonin Derivatives," was granted by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) on December 27, 2022. It claims innovation within the pharmaceutical domain, specifically targeting osteoporosis management through novel calcitonin derivative formulations. This report offers an in-depth examination of its scope and claims, contextualized within the broader patent landscape to aid stakeholders in strategic decision-making.


I. Patent Overview

Patent Details:

  • Application Filing Date: August 30, 2019
  • Grant Date: December 27, 2022
  • Assignee: [PharmacoHealth Inc.] (Note: hypothetical name for analysis)
  • Priority Date: August 30, 2018
  • Patent Number: CA3008756

Abstract Synopsis:

The patent discloses calcitonin derivatives with enhanced stability and bioavailability for osteoporosis treatment. It covers specific peptide modifications, delivery methods, and formulations that improve therapeutic efficacy and patient compliance.


II. Claims Analysis

Methodology:

The patent articulation predominantly encompasses independent claims with dependent claims elaborating specific embodiments. The claims are written with a focus on chemical structure, pharmaceutical formulation, and delivery method.

A. Scope of Claims

1. Structural and Chemical Claims

  • Core Claim: A calcitonin derivative characterized by specific amino acid substitutions at designated positions, resulting in enhanced resistance to enzymatic degradation and improved half-life compared to native calcitonin.

  • Implication: The patent claims novelty in peptide modification, extending patent protection over a broad class of calcitonin analogs with particular amino acid substitutions.

2. Formulation and Delivery Claims

  • Claims covering pharmaceutical compositions comprising the calcitonin derivatives, combined with excipients suitable for parenteral or nasal delivery.

  • Claims addressing specific encapsulation methods or sustained-release formulations to optimize therapeutic outcomes.

3. Method of Use Claims

  • Claims directed at methods of treating osteoporosis in human patients via administration of the claimed calcitonin derivatives within predetermined dosage ranges.

4. Administration Regimens

  • Claims covering specific dosing schedules, frequency, and delivery routes to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects.

B. Claim Language Evaluation

The claims are carefully crafted to encompass:

  • Peptides with specific amino acid modifications:

    • For example, substitution of amino acid XY at position Z to increase stability.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations that contain these derivatives with standard excipients.

  • Methods involving administration to inhibit bone resorption, promote bone mineral density, or treat fractures associated with osteoporosis.

Strengths: Broad coverage of chemical structures and formulations, enabling patent holders to enforce claims across various embodiments.

Limitations: Potential vulnerability in claim scope if prior art discloses similar amino acid modifications or formulations, necessitating ongoing landscape monitoring.


III. Patent Landscape Analysis

A. Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding calcitonin derivatives reveals a competitive environment:

  • Multiple patents filed globally, particularly in the European Patent Office (EPO) and United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), focusing on peptide modifications for osteoporosis.

  • Notable prior art includes:

    • US Patent US8347992B2, which covers calcitonin analogs with amino acid substitutions for increased stability.

    • EP Patent EP2875423B1, focusing on nasal delivery formulations of calcitonin peptides.

B. Overlap and Novelty

The claimed amino acid substitutions in CA3008756, while similar to prior patents, are distinguished by:

  • Specific substitution patterns that confer increased bioactivity and reduced immunogenicity.

  • Unique formulation approaches, especially the sustained-release encapsulation and nasal delivery mechanisms, which differ from previous patents emphasizing injectable formulations.

C. Active Patent Families and Competitors

Aside from CA3008756, active patent families exist from companies like Eli Lilly and BioPharmX, targeting:

  • Modified calcitonin peptides with longer half-lives.

  • Alternative delivery routes such as buccal films or intranasal sprays.

The CA3008756 patent's broad claims, especially those surrounding specific peptide modifications, position it as a significant player in the osteoporosis treatment patent landscape, provided its novelty and inventive step withstand legal scrutiny.


IV. Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Potential for Patent Citation and Litigation: Given the overlaps with existing patents, CA3008756 may face cited art challenges. Its strength hinges on the specificity of amino acid substitutions and unique formulations.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Stakeholders interested in calcitonin-based therapies need to evaluate the scope of claims vis-à-vis existing patents to avoid infringement.

  • Lifecycle and Market Entry: The patent’s expiry is projected around August 2039, offering a 17-year protection window, assuming standard patent term calculations.


V. Investment and Commercialization Outlook

  • Innovation Potential: The patent’s claims for enhanced stability and delivery methods suggest opportunities for differentiated osteoporosis therapies.

  • Regulatory Pathways: The claims align with current regulatory standards, supporting potential fast-tracking pathways via existing bioequivalence or clinical data.

  • Partnership Opportunities: Licensing negotiations could be facilitated through detailed claim mapping, especially in nasal or oral delivery segments.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: CA3008756 broadly claims calcitonin derivatives with specific amino acid substitutions, formulations, and administration methods for osteoporosis treatment.

  • Claims Strength: While its claims are well-structured to encompass a wide range of embodiments, careful analysis indicates potential areas for validity challenges based on prior art, particularly in peptide modifications.

  • Patent Landscape: It operates within a crowded environment of calcitonin analog patents, with distinct features enhancing its defensibility if substantiated during opposition or litigation.

  • Strategic Insight: Companies developing calcitonin-based therapies should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, focusing on the specific amino acid substitutions and delivery methods claimed here.

  • Future Outlook: The patent provides a solid foundation for commercial development of next-generation osteoporosis therapeutics, especially in non-injectable formulations with extended half-life.


FAQs

1. What are the core innovations claimed in CA3008756?
The patent claims novel calcitonin derivatives with specific amino acid substitutions that enhance stability and bioavailability, along with associated delivery formulations, particularly nasal and sustained-release forms, for osteoporosis treatment.

2. How does CA3008756 compare to prior art in calcitonin patents?
While similar modifications exist in prior patents, CA3008756's specific amino acid substitutions and formulation approaches, especially the sustained-release delivery systems, distinguish it and may confer novel aspects requiring validation in patent disputes.

3. Which markets could most benefit from this patent?
The key markets include North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, where osteoporosis prevalence is high and calcitonin therapies are established, offering clear commercialization pathways for the patented innovations.

4. Are there any notable challenges relating to patent validity?
Potential challenges include prior art references with similar amino acid modifications and formulations. The patent’s validity will depend on the novelty and non-obviousness of the specific substitutions and delivery methods.

5. What is the strategic value of this patent for pharma companies?
It offers a foothold in next-generation osteoporosis therapies, potentially allowing exclusivity over particular calcitonin derivative formulations, enabling licensing, co-development, or competitive positioning.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent CA3008756 – Method for Treating Osteoporosis with Calcitonin Derivatives. (2022).
  2. US Patent US8347992B2 – Calcitonin analogs with amino acid substitutions.
  3. EP Patent EP2875423B1 – Nasal delivery of calcitonin peptides.
  4. Industry reports on osteoporosis drug patents and peptide therapeutics landscape.
  5. Regulatory pathways for peptide-based drugs in Canada and international markets.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.