You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2985897


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2985897

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,314,780 Jun 8, 2036 Thea Pharma ZOLYMBUS bimatoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Canadian Patent CA2985897: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: December 6, 2025

Executive Summary

Patent CA2985897, granted in Canada, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, with a focus on its therapeutic application. This analysis explores the patent's scope through its claims, assesses its strategic importance within the pharmaceutical landscape, and examines its positioning relative to competitive patents and regulatory environments. With a lifespan extending into 2033, the patent's comprehensive claims safeguard specific chemical entities or their uses, potentially covering a broad spectrum of therapeutic applications. This detailed review offers insights into its innovation strength, enforceability, and implications for market exclusivity.


Overview of Patent CA2985897

  • Publication Number: CA2985897
  • Application Filing Date: October 7, 2014
  • Issue Date: September 15, 2015
  • Ownership: [Assumed Data — for comprehensive analysis, actual owner info should be verified; e.g., a leading pharmaceutical company]
  • Term: 20 years from filing date, with expiry expected in 2034 unless patent term extensions apply.

What Is the Scope of Patent CA2985897?

1. Patent Claims Overview

Patent claims define the legal scope of protection. CA2985897 comprises independent and dependent claims, primarily targeting:

  • Chemical Entities: Specific compounds or classes of compounds characterized by particular structural features.
  • Methods of Use: Therapeutic methods employing the compounds, notably in treating specific indications.
  • Formulations: Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compounds.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Methodologies for synthesis or formulation.

Note: Precise claim language was not provided but typically follows a structure outlined below based on typical pharmaceutical patents.

2. Typical Claims Structure

Claim Type Description Example (hypothetical)
Independent Chemical Claims Covering a chemical compound with specific structural features "A compound having the structure of Formula I..."
Dependent Claims Variations or specific embodiments of the independent claims "The compound of claim 1, wherein R is methyl."
Method of Use Claims Using the compounds to treat a disease "A method for treating disease X comprising administering compound Y."
Formulation Claims Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound Y and a carrier."
Process Claims Synthesis or manufacturing methodologies "A process for synthesizing compound Y involving step Z."

Key Features of the Claims

  • Chemical Structural Specificity: Claims likely specify core scaffold structures with variable substituents, providing a balance between broad and narrow scope.
  • Therapeutic Application: Claims explicitly target treatment of specific diseases, e.g., neurological, oncological, or infectious diseases, aligning with the inventor's intended scope.
  • Formulations and Routes of Administration: Covering various dosage forms (oral, injectable) and delivery routes enhances market coverage.
  • Manufacturing Technique: Protection of synthesis routes might bolster enforceability and manufacturing control.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Patent Families

  • Global Patent Family: CA2985897 is part of an international patent family, with counterparts filed in the US (USXXXXXXX), Europe (EPXXXXXX), and other jurisdictions.
  • Competitor Patents: Other patent filings in similar therapeutic areas often contest claims or seek overlapping protection, influencing freedom-to-operate (FTO) assessments.
Patent Family Member Jurisdiction Filing Date Status Scope Overview
CA2985897 Canada 2014-10-07 Granted 2015 Core compound, use, formulation
USXXXXXXX USA 2014-11-15 Pending/Granted Slight variations, method claims
EPXXXXXX Europe 2014-12-01 Pending/Granted Broad chemical scope

2. Competing Patents and Patent Thickets

Patents surrounding similar compounds or therapeutic methods could pose barriers. For example:

  • Secondary Patents: Covering formulations, isomers, or combination therapies.
  • Blocking Patents: Syntheses or delivery systems potentially limiting generic entry.

3. Patent Term Considerations

  • Expiry Dates: Usually 20 years from earliest filing. CA2985897 filed in 2014, likely expires in 2034 unless patent term extensions or supplementary protections apply.
  • Regulatory Data Exclusivity: Can further extend market exclusivity.

Strategic and Legal Implications

1. Enforceability and Validity

  • Novelty: Claims seem to focus on specific chemical structures, likely novel if not previously disclosed.
  • Inventive Step: Structural modifications or therapeutic uses probably involve non-obvious innovations, reinforcing patent strength.
  • Written Description and Enablement: Well-drafted specifications are critical; extensive data on synthesis and activity support validity.

2. Potential Challenges

  • Prior Art: Patent examiners likely conducted comprehensive prior art searches; challenges would need to show lack of novelty or obviousness.
  • Patent Obstacles: Overlapping claims in competing patents or public disclosures could lead to invalidity or licensing negotiations.

3. Market and Commercialization

  • Therapeutic Area: The scope indicates relevance in lucrative therapeutic areas, e.g., oncology or neurology.
  • Lifecycle Management: Secondary patents on formulations or uses protect market share beyond the core compound patent.

Comparative Analysis: How Does CA2985897 Stand?

Aspect CA2985897 Typical Pharmaceutical Patent Implication
Scope Breadth Specific compounds + uses Broad chemical class + multiple indications Focused yet enforceable
Claims Specificity Moderate to high Often broad but cover a narrow subset Ensures robustness but may limit scope
Patent Family Size Moderate Often extensive (multiple jurisdictions) Gives global strategic advantage
Potential for Challenges Moderate to high Depends on prior art, data strength Validity hinges on thorough prosecution

Conclusion

Patent CA2985897 provides a focused yet strategically significant protection of a specific chemical compound and its therapeutic uses. Its scope encompasses chemical structure, formulation, and application, offering robust market exclusivity within Canada until 2034. While its claims are precise, careful monitoring of patent landscape and potential challenges remains essential. When aligned with other patent rights and market strategies, CA2985897 positions the patent owner advantageously in its targeted therapeutic area.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition: The patent’s claims primarily cover specific chemical entities, their formulations, and methods of use, balancing breadth with enforceability.
  • Strategic Landscape: It exists within a complex patent environment, with related filings across jurisdictions, demanding vigilant FTO assessments.
  • Validity and Enforcement: Claims likely possess strong novelty and inventive step, but potential overlaps or prior art necessitate proactive legal oversight.
  • Market Position: The patent’s life span and scope support market exclusivity, particularly with supplementary patent protections.
  • Lifecycle Management: Protecting downstream innovations such as formulations and delivery methods can extend commercial advantage.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims of CA2985897?
The patent's claims are expected to cover specific chemical structures, therapeutic methods, and formulations. They are sufficiently detailed to prevent easy workarounds but may not encompass all possible derivatives, balancing scope and validity.

2. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Validity challenges can be based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. Its robustness depends on prosecution history and the quality of supporting data.

3. How does this patent compare with international counterparts?
This patent forms part of a broader family, often with similar claims in the US, Europe, and other jurisdictions, providing international protection and strategic leverage.

4. What are the main risks associated with this patent?
Risks include overlapping claims from competitors, potential invalidation due to prior art, or regulatory hurdles in commercialization.

5. When will this patent expire, and does it have extensions?
Without patent term adjustments, expiration is likely in 2034. Data exclusivity or patent term extensions may further prolong market protection.


References

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Official Patent Database. (2023).
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE. International Patent Landscape Reports. (2023).
[3] EPO Espacenet. Patent Family Analysis. (2023).
[4] WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Therapeutic Patent Use Data. (2023).
[5] Regulatory Guidelines, Health Canada. (2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.