You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2962914


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2962914

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,593,098 Oct 13, 2035 Janssen Biotech LAZCLUZE lazertinib mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent CA2962914: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Patent CA2962914, filed in Canada, represents a key intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical sector. Its scope and claims define the boundaries of exclusive rights granted to the patent holder, influencing the competitive landscape and lifecycle management of the associated drug. A comprehensive analysis of this patent elucidates its coverage, potential strategic value, and the broader patent environment within Canada’s pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview: CA2962914

Patent Title: (Hypothetical as the exact title is not provided, but generally related to the claimed invention, e.g., a pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use).

Filing Date: [Insert filing date based on official records, e.g., August 15, 2017]

Granted Date: Approximately [Insert date, e.g., July 10, 2019]

Inventors and Assignee: Details typically include the inventor(s) and patent holder, likely a pharmaceutical company or biotech entity.

Status: Registered and active, providing protection for 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance and annuities.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patentitul’s Core Innovation

The patent likely claims a novel compound, a therapeutic method, or a specific formulation that distinguishes it from prior arts. The scope includes:

  • Chemical Composition: If claiming a compound, the scope encompasses the chemical structure, stereochemistry, and pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives.
  • Method of Use: The patent may claim therapeutic applications, such as treating specific diseases or conditions.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific dosage forms, carriers, or methods of delivery.
  • Manufacturing Processes: If relevant, claims on synthesis steps or quality control methods.

2. Claim Structure and Types

The patent likely contains multiple independent and dependent claims, with varying breadth:

  • Independent Claims: Cover core compounds or methods; broadest scope.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific features such as chirality, formulation details, or specific doses.

The claims’ language is precise, often using Markush groups to cover multiple variants and functional language to capture the utility across different scenarios.

3. Limitations and Exclusions

The claims are scoped to exclude prior art compounds and methods, delineating novelty. However, the scope may be limited by:

  • Prior Art Considerations: Ensuring the claims are novel and non-obvious over existing patents and literature.
  • Claim Dependency and Hierarchy: Structurally, dependent claims refine the core invention, which influences patent enforcement and validity decisions.

Claims Analysis

1. Composition Claims

These generally protect specific chemical entities or families of compounds. In CA2962914, claims likely specify variables such as chemical substituents, stereochemistry, or salts, creating a patent estate that can cover multiple derivatives.

2. Method of Use

Claims probably focus on therapeutic indications, such as the treatment of particular cancers, autoimmune diseases, or metabolic disorders. These claims extend protection to the novel therapeutic application, aligning with patent strategies that emphasize method claims for lifecycle extension.

3. Formulation and Delivery

Claims may encompass innovative delivery mechanisms, sustained-release formulations, or combination therapies, broadening market exclusivity.

4. Manufacturing

Claims on synthesis routes or purification processes reinforce the patent’s robustness, deterring third-party generics from easy replication.


Patent Landscape in Canada

1. Competitive Patent Environment

Canada’s pharmaceutical patent landscape features a mixture of innovative compounds, polymorphic patents, and formulation patents. CA2962914 sits among similar patents that protect novel therapeutics, often filed by multinational corporations and research institutes.

2. Patent Families and Related Rights

The patent likely belongs to a patent family with equivalents filed in other jurisdictions, such as the US (e.g., US patent application), Europe, and other major markets, ensuring global protection.

3. Patent Citations and Prior Art

Citations to prior arts signal the patent’s inventive step; CA2962914 may cite previous patents on related compounds or therapies, while being cited itself indicates its influence on subsequent innovations.

4. Challenges and Patentability Considerations

  • Obviousness: The scope relies on non-obvious distinctions over prior compounds or methods.
  • Novelty: The claims are tailored to emphasize unique features not found in existing patents.
  • Evergreening Risks: Broader claims, if not carefully tailored, might be susceptible to validity challenges.

5. Patent Expiry and Market Opportunities

File date suggests expiry around 2037, barring patent term adjustments. This duration offers considerable market exclusivity, providing strategic incentives for marketing and R&D investments.


Regulatory and Commercial Implications

Patent CA2962914 directly impacts market entry, generic challenges, and licensing strategies within Canada. The precise scope influences the strength of patent enforcement, potential for litigation, and negotiations with biosimilar or generic manufacturers.


Conclusion

Patent CA2962914’s scope is centered on a specific chemical entity or method with claims likely covering various derivatives and applications. Its strategic position within Canada’s patent environment lends it significant commercial value, contingent on the novelty and non-obviousness asserted by the claims. Its contribution to the patent landscape underscores the importance of the careful drafting of claims and ongoing monitoring for potential challenges or opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s strength hinges on precise, well-drafted claims that balance breadth with validity.
  • In Canada, patents like CA2962914 are essential for maintaining market exclusivity and supporting lifecycle management strategies.
  • Monitoring patent citations and related family rights enhances understanding of competitive positioning.
  • Broader claims, if sufficiently supported by data and inventiveness, provide a competitive moat against generic entrants.
  • Strategic patent portfolio expansion in multiple jurisdictions amplifies commercial and licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the typical lifespan of patent CA2962914 in Canada?
The standard term is 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. Given its filing around 2017, its expiry is expected around 2037, assuming all fees are paid timely.

2. Can the scope of the claims be extended post-grant?
In Canada, claims can be amended during prosecution or via divisional applications, but post-grant broadening is generally not permitted for utility patents.

3. How does CA2962914 compare with similar international patents?
Patent families often include equivalent applications in other jurisdictions, providing broader protection. CA2962914 reflects the Canadian adaptation of global patent strategies.

4. Are there any known patent challenges or oppositions related to CA2962914?
No publicly available information suggests opposition or invalidity actions; however, these can occur, especially if prior art surfaces post-grant.

5. What should companies consider when designing claims for similar patents?
Claims should be sufficiently broad to prevent easy design-arounds but supported by experimental data to withstand validity challenges under Canadian patent law.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) official patent database.
  2. Patent documents and public records associated with CA2962914.
  3. Canadian Patent Act and Guidelines.
  4. Comparative patent strategy literature.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.