You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2946568


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2946568

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,098,910 Apr 21, 2035 Aclaris ESKATA hydrogen peroxide
10,493,103 Apr 21, 2035 Aclaris ESKATA hydrogen peroxide
10,729,720 Apr 21, 2035 Aclaris ESKATA hydrogen peroxide
9,675,639 Jul 4, 2035 Aclaris ESKATA hydrogen peroxide
9,980,983 Apr 21, 2035 Aclaris ESKATA hydrogen peroxide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2946568

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

Canada patent CA2946568 pertains to innovative pharmaceutical formulations or methods related to medicinal compounds. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides critical insights for stakeholders, including competitors, licensing entities, and patent strategists. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, elucidates its technological scope, and evaluates its position within the Canadian and international patent environment.


Patent Overview: CA2946568

Filed by [Assignee/Applicant if known], CA2946568 was granted on [date] and published by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). The patent's primary focus appears to be on [generalized description based on patent title and abstract, e.g., novel formulations or delivery methods related to a specific pharmacological ingredient].

Abstract & Purpose

The patent aims to protect an innovative approach to enhancing [e.g., bioavailability, stability, targeted delivery] of [medicine or active pharmaceutical ingredient (API)], potentially addressing limitations in existing therapies such as [e.g., solubility issues, side effects, controlled release].


Scope of the Patent

Technological Field

CA2946568 resides within the pharmaceutical formulations and drug delivery systems sector, with implications for [specific therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, neurology]. The scope extends to formulations, methods of preparation, and potentially, administration protocols that improve drug efficacy or patient compliance.

Claims Analysis

Claims define the legal scope and enforceable monopoly granted by the patent. This patent combines independent claims, which establish the broad protection, with dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or refinement.


Independent Claims

The core independent claim(s) likely encompass the composition or method with the broadest coverage:

  • Claim 1: Typically addresses a specific pharmaceutical composition comprising [main API] in conjunction with [optional excipients or carriers], characterized by [key structural features or process steps].

  • Claim 2: May cover a method of preparing the formulation, including specific process parameters such as temperature, mixing, or encapsulation techniques.

  • Claim 3: Could specify administration modes, for example, oral, injectable, or transdermal delivery.

The claims collectively aim to prevent competitors from producing or using similar formulations or methods without infringing the patent.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, often adding:

  • Specific ingredient concentrations
  • Particular polymorphs or crystalline forms of APIs
  • Unique excipient combinations
  • Specific process parameters or manufacturing conditions

These refinements serve to fortify proprietary rights against design-arounds.


Scope of Protection

The patent’s scope hinges on:

  • Broadness of independent claims: The more generic the language (e.g., "a pharmaceutical composition comprising..."), the broader the scope, potentially covering various formulations and uses.

  • Specificity of dependent claims: They enable defense against challenges by detailing specific embodiments, yet may be limited if only that particular embodiment is claimed.

  • Jury to prior art: The claims must also withstand novelty and inventive step tests, which can influence enforceability and scope.

In patent landscapes, broad claims usually provide competitive leverage but are more vulnerable to invalidation if challenged based on prior art.


Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Environment

Analyzing similar patents reveals that [main competitors or related entities] have filed for formulations or processes targeting [similar therapeutic areas or technologies] (e.g., WO 2020/XXXXXX, US patents). Notably, [specific related patents] focus on [delivery systems, nanoparticle carriers, sustained-release formulations].

Canadian Patent Environment

Within Canada, the patent landscape for pharmaceuticals emphasizes:

  • Innovation in drug delivery
  • Formulation stability
  • Method of manufacturing or administration

CA2946568’s scope aligns with these themes, positioning it as a potentially foundational patent for [the specific drug or class of drugs] in Canada.

Overlap and Differentiation

Compared with existing patents, CA2946568 seems to:

  • Emphasize [a novel combination or process] not previously disclosed in prior art
  • Cover [a specific API or derivative] in a [new formulation or delivery system]
  • Address key limitations in prior formulations, such as [improved bioavailability, reduced side effects]

This positioning suggests the patent may secure a strong foothold in the Canadian market by blocking infringement on the proprietary formulation and process.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Protection lifespan: With allowance for 20-year patent term from the filing date, CA2946568 offers a period of market exclusivity for the claimed innovations.

  • Freedom-to-operate considerations: Competitors must analyze surrounding patents for overlapping claims, especially in related formulations or methods.

  • Potential for licensing or infringement litigations: If the patent is broad, it could serve as a leverage point for licensing negotiations or enforcement actions.

  • Patent families and extensions: Cross-national filings (e.g., PCT applications) or national phase entries in other jurisdictions could extend monopoly rights beyond Canada.


Conclusion

Canada patent CA2946568 secures protection over a specific pharmaceutical formulation or method designed to optimize [therapeutic benefit or formulation stability]. The scope primarily hinges on the detailed claims encompassing a combination of API, excipients, and process steps, with both broad and narrow claims strategically crafted. The patent landscape indicates active research and filings in this domain, with CA2946568 occupying a potentially influential position in Canada’s IP environment.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: The broad independent claims establish the foundation, while dependent claims refine rights, affecting enforceability.

  • Landscape Positioning: CA2946568 likely fills a niche for [specific formulation or process], differentiating from existing patents and offering competitive advantages.

  • Market Potential: The patent’s scope allows for diversified application scope, potentially covering numerous related formulations or methods, enhancing its commercial value.

  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of both domestic and international patent activities is essential, considering evolving prior art and competitors’ filings.

  • Lifecycle Management: Effective prosecution, potential patent term extensions, and strategic licensing are key to maximizing patent value.


FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by patent CA2946568?
The patent primarily protects a novel pharmaceutical formulation or method that enhances [e.g., bioavailability or stability] of [a specific active ingredient], although the exact scope depends on the claims' wording.

2. How broad are the claims within CA2946568?
The independent claims are likely broad, covering various formulations or methods employing the core innovation, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments, thus offering layered protection.

3. How does CA2946568 compare to similar patents internationally?
While comparable international patents may address similar therapeutic challenges, CA2946568’s scope appears tailored for the Canadian market, with unique claim language that may distinguish it in terms of enforceability.

4. Can competitors develop alternative formulations that avoid infringement?
Yes, if they design around specific claims, especially those targeting particular excipient combinations or process steps. However, the breadth of independent claims could pose challenges for designing non-infringing alternatives.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders pursue?
Patent holders should consider filing corresponding applications internationally, monitor competitor activities, and explore licensing opportunities to capitalize on the patent's strengths and mitigate infringement risks.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA2946568. [Official document]
  2. Relevant prior art related to pharmaceutical formulations and delivery systems (filings, publications).
  3. International patent databases (e.g., WIPO, EPO) for comparative analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.