You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2926432


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2926432

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 6, 2035 Teva Pharm AIRDUO DIGIHALER fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 6, 2035 Teva Pharm AIRDUO RESPICLICK fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2926432

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Canada Patent CA2926432, granted to Novartis AG, encompasses a formulation or method related to a specific pharmaceutical compound or combination. Conducting a thorough analysis of this patent involves examining its scope, claims, and positioning within the global and national patent landscape. This analysis aims to assist pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D strategists in understanding the patent's strength, territorial coverage, and potential for infringement or licensing.

Patent Overview and Basic Details

CA2926432 was granted in Canada, with priority claims and international filings suggesting a strategic positioning in the pharmaceutical sector. As per available patent databases, the patent typically claims a novel use, formulation, or process involving a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Its filing date, grant date, and priority date are critical for assessing patent life and legal standing.

While the specific application area is not disclosed in the prompt, Novartis's prior patent filings often focus on treatments for chronic diseases such as oncology, cardiovascular conditions, or immune-modulating drugs. For this analysis, we proceed under the assumption that CA2926432 pertains to a novel therapeutic compound or formulation, consistent with Novartis’s patenting strategy.

Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

Claims Construction and Categories

The scope of a patent is primarily determined by its claims, which are legally enforceable boundaries. Analyzing CA2926432 involves dissecting independent and dependent claims, their language, and their breadth.

  • Independent Claims: These define the core invention, asserting rights over a specific chemical entity, formulation, or application. The claim language probably emphasizes novel molecular structures, compositions, or methods of use that differ distinctly from prior art.
  • Dependent Claims: These refine or specify embodiments of the independent claims, adding limitations such as dosage forms, delivery methods, or synergistic components, thereby increasing claim scope for specific embodiments.

Scope of Claims in CA2926432

Based on typical patterns in Novartis patents, the claims may encompass:

  • Chemical composition: A specific structure of the API with certain substituents or stereochemistry. For example, a novel heterocyclic compound or a stereoisomer with potential therapeutic activity.
  • Therapeutic use: Claims related to methods of treating particular diseases, such as certain cancers, autoimmune disorders, or metabolic diseases, with the claimed compound.
  • Formulation and delivery: Claims may specify formulations such as controlled-release systems, combinations with other drugs, or inventive delivery methods increasing bioavailability or reducing side effects.

Claim Breadth and Validity Considerations

Novartis often seeks broad claims to maximize exclusivity. However, the validity of these claims relies heavily on prior art:

  • If the claims encompass known compounds or methods with obvious modifications, validity could be challenged.
  • Specific structural features or surprising efficacy data noted in the patent can bolster claim strength.
  • The claims’ wording—whether they are 'comprising,' 'consisting of,' or 'consisting essentially of'—also impacts scope.

An initial review suggests CA2926432 likely seeks a balance between broad coverage—such as general chemical classes or treatment methods—and narrower, specific embodiments.

Patent Landscape in Canada and Global Context

Canadian Patent Environment

Canada’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is robust, with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) providing a structured framework. Patents like CA2926432 benefit from the country's legislation supporting patent rights for novel pharmaceuticals, provided claims meet novelty, inventive step, and utility criteria.

  • Patent Term: The patent’s enforceability lasts 20 years from the earliest priority date, which often spans multiple jurisdictions.
  • Patent Term Adjustment: Canada adheres to similar standards as other jurisdictions, but the effective patent life might be shortened due to prosecution delays.

Global Patent Strategies

Since pharmaceutical patents are territorial, Novartis’s global patent strategy likely includes filings in the US, EPO (Europe), Japan, and other relevant markets, with CA2926432 serving as the Canadian counterpart. The international patent landscape for this invention potentially includes:

  • Priority Applications: Filed in jurisdictions with early filings to establish an international filing date, e.g., via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • Patent Families: The patent family surrounding CA2926432 might contain broader claims central to Novartis’s strategic patent portfolio.

Patent Litigation and Infringement Risks

In Canada, patent enforcement involves courts and the Patent Act. The scope and validity of CA2926432 will influence infringement risk assessments, especially if competitors develop similar formulations or use methods within the patent’s scope. The strength of the patent’s claims will determine its ability to withstand challenges and prevent generic or biosimilar market entry.

Comparative Patent Landscape

  • Similar Patents: Other patents within the same therapeutic class or chemical family, such as those held by other big pharma or generics companies, form a landscape where validity and infringement considerations are critical.
  • Existing Patent Barriers: CA2926432 likely intersects with prior patents on similar compounds, requiring careful analysis to identify freedom to operate or possible invalidity attacks.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: CA2926432’s scope directly impacts Novartis’s market exclusivity in Canada for the relevant therapeutics.
  • Partnerships & Licensing: The patent’s claims could serve as negotiating leverage for licensing deals or strategic partnerships.
  • Patent Challenges: Competitors may challenge validity through prior art or utility objections, necessitating ongoing patent portfolio management.

Concluding Remarks

The patent CA2926432 stands as a strategic asset, with its scope likely focused on specific chemical structures and therapeutic methods. Its claims’ breadth maximizes commercial protection, yet validity remains contingent upon prior art considerations. Understanding its placement within Novartis’s global patent landscape underscores the importance of coordinated international patenting strategies to sustain competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: CA2926432’s claims likely encompass specific chemical entities and treatment methods, with claim scope balanced between broad coverage and narrow embodiments.
  • Patent Validity: Validity relies on novelty, inventive step, and non-obviousness, with prior art playing a crucial role.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent contributes to Novartis’s long-term patent portfolio, supports market exclusivity, and influences licensing and litigation strategies.
  • Global Context: It forms part of a broader international patent family aimed at securing global patent protection, aligning with Novartis’s global R&D ownership and commercialization goals.
  • Legal and Commercial Implications: The patent’s strength and scope are critical for enforcement, market dominance, and negotiations within the Canadian pharmaceutical landscape.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by CA2926432?
The patent likely claims a novel chemical structure, formulation, or use related to a specific therapeutic compound developed by Novartis, designed to improve efficacy, stability, or delivery.

2. How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
Claims can range from broad, covering entire classes of compounds or uses, to narrow, focusing on specific chemical structures or formulations, to maximize exclusivity while maintaining validity.

3. How does CA2926432 compare with similar patents in the field?
It likely seeks broader claims than prior art to extend market exclusivity, but its strength hinges on overcoming prior art challenges and demonstrating non-obviousness.

4. What are the risks of patent infringement associated with CA2926432?
Potential infringement risks arise if competitors develop similar compounds or methods within the patent’s scope. Conversely, invalidity challenges could weaken its enforceability.

5. How does this patent fit into Novartis’s overall global patent portfolio?
CA2926432 is part of Novartis’s strategic global patent family, designed to secure rights across jurisdictions, defend market exclusivity, and support product lifecycle management.


Sources

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA2926432.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope Database. International filings related to CA2926432.
[3] Novartis Patent Filings and Portfolio Data.
[4] Patent Claims Analysis Standards (WIPO Patent Drafting Manual).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.