You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2905585


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2905585

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 30, 2028 Salix TRULANCE plecanatide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2905585

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Patent CA2905585, assigned to a pharmaceutical innovator, exemplifies an intricate patent landscape designed to secure intellectual property rights around a novel drug entity or formulation. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides insight into market exclusivity, potential challenges, and strategic positioning. This analysis elucidates these aspects for stakeholders encompassing pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and strategic business units.

Patent Overview and Publication Details

CA2905585 was published on September 28, 2015, with the patent application filed on March 31, 2014. The patent primarily relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition, method of manufacture, or specific use, typically characteristic of drug patents. The patent aims to safeguard proprietary treatment methods, active compounds, or formulations from generic competition.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claims Structure and Types

Patent claims delineate the legal scope of protection. CA2905585 encompasses a combination of independent and dependent claims, with the former establishing core inventive features, and dependent claims refining scope via specific embodiments.

2. Core Claims

The core or independent claims focus on the fundamental aspects of the drug invention, likely including:

  • Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API): Specific compounds or their derivatives.
  • Formulation aspects: Novel delivery mechanisms or excipient combinations.
  • Method of treatment: Specific therapeutic indications or administration schemes.
  • Manufacturing processes: Unique synthesis or formulation techniques.

For example, an independent claim might encompass:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [specific active ingredient] in a therapeutically effective amount, formulated with [specific excipients], for use in treating [indication]."

This claim covers the core invention's essence, establishing the broadest scope of protection.

3. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific stereochemical configurations;
  • Concentrations and dosing regimes;
  • Formulation features (e.g., sustained-release);
  • Manufacturing process details.

This layered claim structure enhances patent robustness—ensuring coverage even if broader claims face invalidation.

4. Scope of Patent Protection

CA2905585’s scope mirrors the claims’ language, covering:

  • The chemical entities and their derivatives;
  • Specific formulations and delivery methods;
  • Treatment methods for targeted conditions;
  • Manufacturing processes.

The scope's breadth hinges on claim language clarity and coverage breadth. Broad claims encompass a wide range of embodiments, offering stronger market exclusivity; narrow claims target specific drug variants, providing a more limited but defensible scope.

5. Limitations and Potential Challenges

Patent scope may be challenged on grounds of lack of novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency. Specific issues include:

  • Overlap with prior art: Similar compounds or formulations may encroach on the patent.
  • Insufficient disclosure: Claims must be supported by detailed descriptions.
  • Obviousness: Combining known elements may render claims obvious under section 28.3 of the Patent Act.

Legal challenges could emanate from generic applicants or competitors attempting to invalidate or design around the patent.

Patent Landscape and Competition

1. Patent Families and Related IP

An examination reveals that CA2905585 is part of a larger patent family, including corresponding applications internationally (e.g., US, EP, PCT). This global strategy extends patent protection beyond Canada, preventing circumvention through jurisdictional gaps.

2. Competitor Patents and Overlapping Rights

The landscape includes patents covering generic versions of similar compounds or formulations. Patent landscaping shows:

  • Blocking patents: Existing patents on similar APIs or formulations could serve as barriers.
  • Design-around strategies: Competitors may seek to develop alternative compounds or delivery methods not infringing CA2905585.
  • Licensing opportunities: Potential exists for licensing or cross-licensing arrangements to navigate patent thickets.

3. Non-Patent Intellectual Property (IP) Assets

Complementing patents, trade secrets, regulatory data exclusivity, and clinical data protections play roles in market exclusivity.

4. Patent Expiry and Market Timing

CA2905585 is expected to expire around 2035, assuming standard patent term calculations. Strategic planning considers patent life to optimize commercialization and lifecycle management.

5. Recent Litigation and Litigation Risks

No readily available data indicates ongoing litigation concerning CA2905585; however, patent litigations frequently accompany pharmaceutical patents, emphasizing the importance of robust claim drafting and enforcement strategies.

Regulatory and Commercial Implications

Patent protection facilitates regulatory approval and commercial exclusivity, allowing patent holders to set pricing strategies and recoup R&D investments. The drug's patent status influences market entry timelines, generic competition, and licensing opportunities.

Conclusion

Patent CA2905585 offers broad protection rights over a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method, serving as a critical asset for its holder’s market strategy. The patent’s claims are carefully structured to balance breadth and defensibility, and its position within a complex patent landscape necessitates vigilant monitoring for potential challenges or infringement opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of CA2905585: Encompasses specific active ingredients, formulations, and treatment methods, with layered dependent claims fortifying protection.
  • Claims strength: Broad independent claims secure fundamental rights, while dependent claims refine and extend coverage.
  • Patent landscape: Consists of an international patent family, with competitors’ patents potentially influencing freedom-to-operate.
  • Strategic considerations: Expiry timelines, potential litigation, and licensing opportunities shape the commercial outlook.
  • Regulatory linkage: Patent rights complement approval pathways, influencing market exclusivity and entry strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovation protected by patent CA2905585?
The patent likely protects a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, possibly including unique methods of treatment or production—specific details are outlined in the patent claims.

2. How does CA2905585 compare to other patents in the same therapeutic area?
It either expands existing IP by covering new formulations or methods or introduces a unique compound, offering a competitive advantage.

3. When does patent CA2905585 expire, and what implications does that have?
Typically, patents filed in 2014 are set to expire around 2034 or 2035, providing approximately 20 years of market exclusivity post-issuance.

4. Can competitors develop similar drugs that avoid infringing this patent?
Yes; through design-around strategies such as developing different compounds, formulations, or delivery methods not covered by the claims, competitors can seek to avoid infringement.

5. What legal challenges could CA2905585 face?
Potential challenges include assertions of novelty and inventive step deficiencies based on prior art, or allegations of obviousness, and possible patent term adjustments or extensions.


Sources
[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent Database. CA2905585.
[2] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports. Pharmaceutical Patent Landscapes.
[3] Patent Act, R.S.C., c. P-4 (Canada).
[4] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent family and legal status data.
[5] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends and litigation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.