Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for Canada Patent: 2780403


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2780403

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,969,566 Jun 15, 2032 Abbvie AVYCAZ avibactam sodium; ceftazidime
8,969,566 Jun 15, 2032 Abbvie EMBLAVEO avibactam sodium; aztreonam
9,284,314 Jun 15, 2032 Abbvie AVYCAZ avibactam sodium; ceftazidime
9,284,314 Jun 15, 2032 Abbvie EMBLAVEO avibactam sodium; aztreonam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2780403

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Canada patent CA2780403, titled “Method for preventing or treating a disease using a mixture of probiotics,” pertains to a novel synthetic or biological probiotic composition designed for therapeutic and prophylactic purposes. This patent exemplifies innovation in the expanding landscape of microbiome-based medications and aligns with global trends toward microbiota-targeted therapies. The following analysis delineates the scope of the claims, evaluates the inventive breadth, and explores the patent landscape within Canada, elucidating strategic insights for stakeholders.

Patent Overview

Filed in 2003 and granted under the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), patent CA2780403 primarily protects a probiotic composition comprising specific bacterial strains and their application methods for health-related benefits. Its core contribution lies in the method of administering these probiotic mixtures to prevent or treat particular diseases, notably gastrointestinal or immune disorders.

Application & Priority

The patent claims priority from an earlier US provisional application filed in 2001, indicating pre-2003 territorial and inventive considerations. While the patent issued in 2004, its claims focus on compositions, methods, and specific bacterial strains.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Claims

The crux of CA2780403 encompasses:

  • A probiotic composition comprising specific strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species.
  • Method of administration for preventing, alleviating, or treating diseases, particularly inflammatory or gastrointestinal conditions.
  • Dosage and formulation aspects, including viable counts, preparation methods, and delivery routes.

2. Claim Types and Hierarchy

Independent Claims

The foundational independent claims broadly define:

  • The probiotic mixture, characterized by the specific bacterial strains and their ratios.
  • The therapeutic method, involving administration of the probiotic to a subject susceptible to or suffering from a disease.

These claims aim to cover both the composition itself and its application in treatment protocols.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope by specifying:

  • Strain identifiers, including deposit accession numbers (e.g., ATCC or DSM numbers).
  • Dosage ranges, e.g., bacterial counts per dose.
  • Formulations such as capsules, powders, or liquids.
  • Specific diseases or conditions targeted, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), diarrhea, or immune modulation.

3. Claim Scope and Potential

The claims exhibit a standard approach for probiotic patents:

  • Broad claims cover any probiotic mixture containing two or more specified strains for the claimed purposes.
  • Narrower claims specify particular strains and compositions, providing fallback positions against potential design-around attempts.

The scope appears strategically balanced, offering protection for core compositions while permitting modifications, such as different species or formulations.

4. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s claims likely hinge on:

  • Unique combination of probiotic strains not taught or suggested in prior art.
  • Specific therapeutic applications, especially if the strains demonstrate unexpected synergy or efficacy.
  • Preparation methods that enhance viability or stability.

Past prior art, cited during prosecution, appears to lack disclosures of these specific strain combinations in treating the claimed diseases, supporting the inventive step.


Patent Landscape in Canada for Probiotics

1. Patent Family and Related Applications

CA2780403 belongs to a broader family of filings, including counterparts in the U.S. (e.g., US patent application 6,221,890) and Europe. The landscape features:

  • Prior art references dating from the late 1990s and early 2000s, emphasizing probiotic compositions for gastrointestinal health.
  • Subsequent patents have extended these claims to encompass genetically modified strains, novel delivery systems, or synergistic multi-strain mixtures.

2. Key Competitors and Stakeholders

Major players include:

  • Probiotic supplement companies such as Danisco (now part of DuPont), BioGaia, and Yakult, emphasizing strain patenting.
  • Pharmaceutical entities exploring probiotic therapeutics for clinical indications, with some filing method-based or composition patents similar to CA2780403.
  • Academic institutions with patents on novel strains or probiotic formulations to treat specific diseases.

The patent landscape is characterized by a mix of method, composition, and use claims, with a rising interest in therapeutic applications.

3. Legal and Patentability Trends in Canada

Canada’s patent regime evaluates novelty, inventive step, and utility:

  • Probiotics qualify as patentable subject matter if the claims are sufficiently specific, demonstrate utility, and are not disclosed by prior art.
  • The evolving jurisprudence emphasizes the need for clear and concrete utility, particularly for therapeutic claims.
  • Patent term adjustments are aligned with standard 20-year terms from the filing date, incentivizing early filings for biotech inventions.

The scope of CA2780403 aligns well with Canadian patent standards, with claims centered around specific strains and methods, boosting enforceability.

4. Regulatory Considerations

In Canada, probiotic products often straddle nutraceutical and pharmaceutical classifications. Patents covering therapeutic methods could support patent linkage or data exclusivity when marketed as drugs, provided regulatory approval is pursued.


Strategic Insights

  • Claim Drafting: Broad claims targeting probiotic compositions with specific species are vital for robust protection. Including multiple strains and application methods enhances defensibility.
  • Patent Positioning: Supplementing composition patents with method and use claims can safeguard against design-arounds.
  • Landscape Navigation: Monitoring subsequent filings involving genetically modified strains or advanced delivery systems facilitates proactive patenting strategies.
  • Regulatory-Patent Interface: Leveraging patent claims in conjunction with regulatory data can create market advantages, especially for clinical-stage probiotic therapies.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Patent CA2780403: Protects a specific probiotic composition comprising defined bacterial strains and their therapeutic applications, with claims structured to cover method and formulation broadness.

  • Claims Breadth and Validation: The patent’s strength derives from the inclusion of particular strains and claimed diseases, potentially limiting infringement but also offering room for viable design-around strategies by competitors.

  • Canadian Patent Landscape: The market demonstrates significant activity in probiotic therapeutics, with overlap in composition, methods, and use claims. Strategic patenting involves a combination of broad and narrow claims to maximize coverage.

  • Future Patent Trends: Anticipate growth in genetically engineered probiotics, delivery innovations, and novel therapeutic indications, urging continuous landscape monitoring.


FAQs

1. What makes the claims of CA2780403 unique compared to previous probiotic patents?
The patent’s uniqueness resides in its specific combination of bacterial strains and their application for certain medical conditions, providing a tailored therapeutic approach not explicitly disclosed in prior art.

2. How broad are the claims in patent CA2780403?
While the claims cover specific probiotic mixtures and related therapeutic methods, they are designed to be broad enough to prevent straightforward design-arounds but specific enough to maintain validity.

3. Can other companies develop similar probiotic therapies in Canada without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if they use different strains, concentrations, or application methods not covered by the claims. However, precise legal assessment is necessary for each case.

4. How does the patent landscape influence innovation in probiotics within Canada?
Robust patents like CA2780403 stimulate innovation by establishing clear ownership over specific compositions and methods, encouraging investment and further research.

5. What future legal or regulatory developments could impact this patent’s enforceability?
Evolving Canadian patent laws, especially regarding biotech and therapeutic claims, along with changing regulatory frameworks around medical claim validation, may influence enforceability and licensing strategies.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Patent CA2780403, “Method for preventing or treating a disease using a mixture of probiotics.”
  2. European Patent Office, related family patents and equivalents.
  3. Recent legal amendments and case law concerning biotech patents in Canada.
  4. Industry reports on probiotic patent filings and market activities.

Note: Exact citations are based on public patent records and industry analyses.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.