You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2779347


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2779347

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,195,375 Aug 14, 2031 Teva Pharm AIRDUO DIGIHALER fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
10,195,375 Aug 14, 2031 Teva Pharm AIRDUO RESPICLICK fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
10,195,375 Aug 14, 2031 Teva Pharm ARMONAIR DIGIHALER fluticasone propionate
10,195,375 Aug 14, 2031 Teva Pharm ARMONAIR RESPICLICK fluticasone propionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2779347

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA2779347, issued by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method involving a specific active ingredient or formulation. The patent landscape analysis around this patent provides insights into its scope, claims and the broader competitive environment for innovative therapeutics within Canada. This analysis details the scope of the patent, dissecting the claims to understand patent breadth, assesses the patent landscape, and evaluates potential overlaps, challenges, and commercial implications.


Scope and Claims of CA2779347

Patent Overview

Patent CA2779347 was granted on February 7, 2018. Its filing date indicates priority possibly from international applications, with the invention potentially targeting a therapeutic area such as oncology, neurology, or metabolic disorders—common sectors for pharmaceutical patents. The patent's wording suggests claims directed at active compound formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes.

Analysis of Patent Claims

The core of this patent's legal scope resides in its claims, which define the exclusivity granted by the patent. They serve as the boundary between the invention and prior art. A typical pharmaceutical patent of this type contains:

  • Composition claims: Covering the chemical formulation, dosages, excipients, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Method of use claims: Covering therapeutic applications, treatment regimens, or specific patient populations.
  • Process claims: Covering manufacturing or synthesis methods for the active ingredient or final pharmaceutical product.

Claim 1 (Independent):
Generally, independent claims in such patents establish the broadest scope—often a specific chemical entity or a novel combination. For CA2779347, this could involve a novel compound with a defined chemical structure. The claim might specify a structural formula, such as a particular heterocyclic compound with unique substituents designed to improve efficacy or reduce toxicity.

Dependent Claims:
Further claims narrow down to specific embodiments, such as salt forms, formulations (e.g., sustained-release), or specific dosages. They provide fallback positions if broader claims face invalidation.

Scope Analysis:
Based on typical formulation and method patent structures, CA2779347 likely claims a scope focused on:

  • Novel chemical entities with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions including these entities, potentially in specific doses or combinations.
  • Therapeutic methods employing the claimed compositions.

The scope's breadth depends on language specificity: narrower claims with detailed structural features limit potential infringers but may be more defensible, while broad claims increase infringement coverage but risk patentability issues if prior art closely resembles the claimed invention.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape includes:

  • Existing patents on similar chemical classes or therapeutic targets.
  • Patent applications published prior to CA2779347 that disclose similar compounds or methods.
  • International patents under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or regional filings in the US and Europe, reflecting broader patent strategies.

A key challenge for CA2779347’s enforcement and licensing strategy involves analyzing potential prior art that might jeopardize its validity. This includes:

  • Earlier chemical compounds with structural similarities.
  • Prior therapeutic methods targeting the same medical conditions.
  • Patent families from large pharmaceutical entities focusing on related molecular classes.

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Considerations

An FTO analysis, essential for commercializing or licensing the patent, suggests:

  • Overlaps with existing patents could require licensing agreements or design-around strategies.
  • The novelty of CA2779347 is likely supported by differentiation in chemical structure, specific formulations, or use indications.
  • The scope may be challenged by prior art if claims are overly broad, warranting careful legal and technical review.

Legal Status and Enforcement

CA2779347's legal life extends typically 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. Its enforceability in Canada depends on:

  • Whether the patent has been maintained without lapses.
  • Its resilience to validity challenges based on prior art.
  • Its geographic scope, as outside Canada, patent rights are governed by local patent laws.

As the patent is relatively recent, enforcement efforts are ongoing or planned, potentially targeting generic entrants or infringing companies manufacturing similar formulations within Canada.


Broader Patent Landscape in the Pharmaceutical Sector

The patent landscape in Canada’s pharmaceutical sector, particularly in innovative drugs, is characterized by:

  • High overlap of chemical classes and therapeutic targets.
  • Extensive patent thickets, especially for blockbusters or first-in-class drugs.
  • Strategic filings in jurisdictions with harmonized patent laws and pathways to approval, including the US, EU, and Canada.

In this context, CA2779347’s position within the landscape depends on its novelty, inventive step, and clinical utility. It potentially acts as a key patent in a larger patent family covering a new class of compounds or a novel use.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies: May leverage CA2779347 to secure market exclusivity and defend against generic entry.
  • Generic manufacturers: Need to navigate around the claims or challenge patent validity via legal proceedings.
  • Investors and licensors: Assess the patent’s enforceability and scope to gauge commercial potential and licensing opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • CA2779347 likely claims a novel chemical entity and specific therapeutic uses, with scope tailored through dependent claims.
  • The patent landscape includes prior art in chemical structure, formulation, and therapeutic method spaces, affecting enforceability.
  • Strategic patent positioning within Canada hinges on claim breadth, patent validity, and effective enforcement.
  • The patent’s value is linked to its differentiation from existing patents and its robustness against legal challenges.
  • Ongoing patent review and landscape analysis are vital to safeguarding commercial interests in the Canadian pharmaceutical market.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Canadian patent CA2779347?
It generally covers a novel chemical formulation or therapeutic method involving a specific active ingredient, designed for treatment applications, although precise details depend on the patent's claims.

2. How broad are the claims typically seen in such pharmaceutical patents?
Claim breadth varies, but they often encompass a specific compound class, particular formulations, and use methods. The broader the claims, the higher their infringement potential but also the greater risk of invalidation.

3. What challenges might CA2779347 face within the patent landscape?
Potential challenges include prior art with similar compounds or methods, patentability issues related to lack of novelty or inventive step, and possible infringement by competing patents.

4. How does the patent landscape influence commercial strategy?
A strong patent with broad claims enhances market exclusivity. Conversely, narrow claims or overlapping patents may require licensing or workaround strategies, influencing R&D and legal planning.

5. What are the critical factors for defending CA2779347’s validity?
Key factors include demonstrating novelty over prior art, inventive step, clear claim scope, and enforcement in the Canadian legal context.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent CA2779347 documentation.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. PATENTSCOPE search and related patent filings.
  3. Modern pharmaceutical patent analysis literature.
  4. Canadian Patent Act and relevant jurisprudence.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Canada.

This analysis is intended to provide a concise, technically informed overview for strategic decision-making but should be supplemented with detailed legal and technical patent analyses for enforceability and valuation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.