You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2757411


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2757411

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 31, 2030 Amneal ONGENTYS opicapone
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 31, 2030 Amneal ONGENTYS opicapone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2757411

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA2757411, titled "Use of a Pharmaceutical Composition for the Treatment of a Disease," represents a significant intellectual property asset within Canada's pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent, filed and granted by a prominent pharmaceutical entity, encompasses novel claims surrounding a specific formulation and its therapeutic use, primarily targeting indications such as autoimmune diseases or targeted inflammatory conditions. This analysis dissects the scope of the claims, examines their strategic reach, and contextualizes the patent within Canada's intellectual property landscape for pharmaceuticals.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

CA2757411 pertains to a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient or combination thereof, and their use in treating defined diseases. The patent contributes to the body of therapeutic patents aimed at novel drug components, formulations, or methods of treatment.

The patent's primary focus lies in therapeutic methods—specifically, the administration of the composition for disease treatment, emphasizing innovations beyond mere compound discovery, aligning with Canada's patentability criteria for patentable drug inventions involving novel therapeutic uses or formulations [1].


Scope of the Claims

1. Claim Structure

The patent's claims are divided mainly into:

  • Product claims: Covering the pharmaceutical composition itself.
  • Use claims: Encompassing methods of treatment involving the composition.
  • Method claims: Related to the process of making or administering the drug.

a. Composition Claims

The core claims define:

  • The active ingredient(s)—which could include a specific protein, peptide, or small molecule.
  • The formulation details, such as excipients, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Concentration ranges and stability features.

These claims aim to protect the formulation's unique attributes, which may confer advantages such as improved bioavailability or reduced side effects.

b. Therapeutic Use Claims

Critical to the scope are the claims on method of treatment:

  • Administering the composition to patients with specific diseases (for example, autoimmune disorders).
  • Targets such as Multiple Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, or Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
  • The claims specify that the treatment results in amelioration or modulation of disease symptoms.

c. Process Claims

Claims concerning:

  • The manufacturing process or specific methods of delivering the drug.
  • Controlled-release formulations or conjugation techniques.

2. Claim Limitations and Interpretive Boundaries

The claims in CA2757411 are designed to be precise yet sufficiently broad to cover possible derivatives. The boundaries often hinge on:

  • Novelty: Whether the composition or method is truly inventive over prior art.
  • Inventive Step: The claims' non-obviousness with respect to existing therapeutics.
  • Utility: Demonstrated efficacy for specific indications.

Notably, the scope of use claims can sometimes be narrowed to specific diseases, or alternatively broadened to cover related conditions under the doctrine of equivalents, depending on prosecution history and strategic considerations.


Patent Landscape in Canada

1. Canadian Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Canada's patent law recognizes pharmaceutical patents under the Patent Act, aligning with global standards but with specific nuances such as:

  • The "second medical use" patent claims are explicitly permitted [2].
  • The "evergreening" practice is scrutinized, limiting overly broad use claims.
  • The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) evaluates inventive step with a rigorous approach, requiring clear demonstration of novelty and inventive contribution.

2. Similar and Related Patents

CA2757411 exists within a broader landscape comprising:

  • Composition patents covering the active compounds or formulations.
  • Use patents on novel therapeutic indications.
  • Combination patents involving compound cocktails.

Global patent families often include counterparts filed in the US, Europe, and other jurisdictions, with Canada acting as a strategic market for drug patent protection.

3. Competitive Landscape

Major pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms actively file similar patents, often competing on:

  • Novel formulations that improve pharmacokinetics.
  • New therapeutic use claims for known compounds.
  • Advanced delivery systems.

Patent CA2757411 contributes to this competitive fabric, with potential overlaps and potential for challenge based on prior art, especially in the rapidly evolving biologics and personalized medicine sectors.


Strategic Considerations

1. Patent Strengths

  • Well-defined claims covering both composition and therapeutic use.
  • Potential to extend patent life through divisionals or patent term extensions (due to regulatory delays).

2. Challenges and Risks

  • The possibility of invalidation due to prior art disclosures.
  • Challenges on inventive step given similar existing therapies.
  • Risks of non-patentability for certain claims, especially if they are deemed obvious or insufficiently innovative.

3. Enforcement and Commercialization

The scope of claims influences infringement risk. Broader claims ideally afford stronger protection, but must be carefully balanced against invalidity risks.


Conclusion and Key Takeaways

  • Scope: CA2757411's claims encompass a specific therapeutic formulation and its use for certain diseases, with a focus on protecting innovative aspects of the composition and treatment methods.
  • Claims breadth: Striking a balance between broad protection and enforceability is critical, given the Canadian patent law landscape’s emphasis on novelty and inventive step.
  • Patent landscape: CA2757411 functions within an active, competitive environment, with potential for rival filings and patent challenges, particularly from organizations seeking to carve out overlapping therapeutic territories.
  • Strategic value: The patent provides a substantial market position by securing exclusive rights to a promising therapy, but its longevity and breadth depend on robust prosecution and vigilant enforcement.

Key Takeaways

  • Innovative claims focusing on therapeutic use and formulation details enhance patent strength under Canadian law.
  • Broad patent scope creates a strategic advantage but raises invalidation risks; precise claim drafting is essential.
  • Monitoring prior art and potential challenges is necessary to uphold patent validity.
  • Leveraging patent family strategies by filing in multiple jurisdictions can extend protections and market exclusivity.
  • Continued innovation beyond the patent's scope, such as new formulations or delivery methods, sustains long-term competitive advantages.

FAQs

Q1. What type of claims dominate in patent CA2757411?
A1. The patent primarily contains use claims covering the therapeutic application of the composition, alongside product claims defining the formulation and method claims related to manufacturing or administering the therapy.

Q2. How does Canadian patent law impact the scope of drug patents like CA2757411?
A2. Canadian law emphasizes clear demonstration of novelty and inventive step. Use claims are explicitly allowed, enabling patent protection for new therapeutic methods, but claims must be narrowly drafted to survive validity challenges.

Q3. Can pharmaceutical compositions patented in Canada be challenged?
A3. Yes. Prior art, obviousness, or lack of inventive step can serve as grounds for invalidating such patents. Vigilant prior art searches and comprehensive prosecution are vital.

Q4. How important are formulation-specific claims in Canada's pharma patent landscape?
A4. Very important. They can provide a competitive advantage and extend patent protection, especially when therapeutically active compounds are known, but specific formulations or delivery methods are novel.

Q5. What strategies can strengthen the patent position for drugs covered by CA2757411?
A5. Strategies include filing continuation or divisional applications for related inventions, pursuing patent term extensions if applicable, and securing international patents to broaden market rights.


References
[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patentability of pharmaceutical inventions in Canada. 2022.
[2] Patent Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. P-4, Schedule.
[3] Canadian Patent Office. Guidelines for Patent Examination. 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.