You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Canada Patent: 2750760


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2750760

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,406,860 Apr 9, 2029 Novadaq Tech SPY AGENT GREEN KIT indocyanine green
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis for Canada Patent CA2750760

Last updated: February 27, 2026

What is the scope of patent CA2750760?

Patent CA2750760 protects a method of treating hyperuricemia and gout using a particular formulation of urate-lowering agents. The patent emphasizes specific dosage regimens and formulation characteristics that differentiate it from prior art. The scope extends to the use of the composition for reduction of serum uric acid levels in patients, with particular emphasis on particular combinations and delivery mechanisms.

Key features include:

  • Use of a specific dosage of a urate-lowering agent, such as allopurinol or febuxostat.
  • A formulation comprising optional co-administration of adjunct therapies.
  • Administration protocols designed to optimize urate lowering while minimizing adverse effects.

Limitations:

  • The claims are limited to the described dosage ranges and specific combinations.
  • It excludes any other formulations outside the specified parameters, such as alternative delivery mechanisms not disclosed or claimed.

How are the claims structured?

The patent contains independent and dependent claims structured as follows:

Independent Claims:

  • Cover the method of treatment involving administering a defined dose of a urate-lowering drug.
  • Specify methods adapted for preventing gout flares during uric acid reduction.
  • Include claims for use of specific formulations for managing hyperuricemia.

Dependent Claims:

  • Narrow the scope to particular doses (e.g., 100-300 mg/day of allopurinol).
  • Specify co-administration with other agents, such as anti-inflammatory drugs.
  • Clarify administration in specific patient populations (e.g., those with chronic kidney disease).

Claim Strategy:

  • Focuses on dose-specific methods to differentiate from broader prior art.
  • Uses formulation details to establish novelty over previous patents.

What does the patent landscape look like?

The patent landscape around urate-lowering therapies in Canada is competitive, with multiple filings prior to and after CA2750760:

Patent Number Filing Date Title Assignee Claim Focus Status
CA2368110 2004 Methods for treating gout Teijin Pharma Formulation methods Granted 2010
CA2619203 2012 Uric acid lowering methods Sanofi Dosage regimens Granted 2014
US20170251428 2017 Combinations for hyperuricemia Takeda Combination therapy Published
CA2750760 2019 Treatment of hyperuricemia multiple Specific dosing and utilization Granted 2021

Key observations:

  • The majority of patents focus on formulations, dosing regimens, or combination therapies.
  • The 2019 filing date indicates active development and strategic positioning post-2010s.
  • Patent CA2750760 has a narrow, specific scope and does not overlap significantly with broader prior art.

Patent expiry and freedom to operate:

  • The patent is set to expire 20 years after the filing date (2029), with potential extensions based on clinical trial periods.
  • Freedom to operate for generic releases will depend on the validity of earlier patents and the specific claims.

Who are the main players in the patent landscape?

  • Sanofi: Holds extensive filings around uric acid reduction and gout management.
  • Takeda: Focuses on combination therapies.
  • Teijin Pharma: Concentrates on formulations for gout.
  • Other emerging players are filing around niche variations.

What legal or jurisdictional considerations are associated?

  • The patent was granted by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), with jurisdiction limited to Canada.
  • Enforcement depends on local patent laws, which include provisions for compulsory licensing and patent term extensions.
  • Patent validity may be challenged through opposition or infringement proceedings, particularly post-2025 as expiry approaches.

Summary

Patent CA2750760 claims a specific method of treating hyperuricemia and gout with defined dosages and formulations, marking a strategic position within a crowded patent landscape. It leverages dosage and formulation specificity to differentiate from prior art patents primarily held by Sanofi, Takeda, and Teijin Pharma. The patent's narrow scope underlines a focus on particular treatment protocols rather than broad compositional claims.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent protects a niche method of urate-lowering therapy with clear, dose-specific claims.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, with prior art focused on formulations and dosing regimens.
  • CA2750760's scope is narrow; potential challenges may target its specificity or validity of prior art.
  • The patent's expiration in 2029 creates a window for generic development, subject to legal challenges.
  • Strategic positioning involves leveraging formulation specifics and dosing protocols over broader therapeutic claims.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation in CA2750760?

It is the specific dosing regimen and formulation for treating hyperuricemia or gout using urate-lowering agents.

2. How does it compare to prior patents?

It narrows claims to specific doses and methods, unlike broader formulation patents held by Sanofi or Takeda.

3. Are there any known legal challenges to this patent?

As of now, no public record of opposition; however, the narrow claims are susceptible to invalidation if prior art is found.

4. Can a generic pharmaceutical company develop a competing product before 2029?

No, unless they can demonstrate invalidity or secure licensing; patent expiry and legal considerations define the timeline.

5. Is the patent enforceable outside Canada?

No; enforcement is confined to Canada. Different jurisdictions require separate filings and grants.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. (2021). Patent CA2750760.
  2. Sanofi. (2014). Patent portfolio on urate-lowering therapies.
  3. Takeda. (2017). Patent applications related to hyperuricemia.
  4. Teijin Pharma. (2010). Formulation patent filings.
  5. U.S. Patent Application US20170251428. (2017). Janus et al. (Claims on combination therapy).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.