You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2717703


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2717703

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,124,014 Mar 5, 2029 Paratek Pharms NUZYRA omadacycline tosylate
9,265,740 Mar 5, 2029 Paratek Pharms NUZYRA omadacycline tosylate
9,265,740 Oct 24, 2030 Paratek Pharms NUZYRA omadacycline tosylate
9,724,358 Mar 5, 2029 Paratek Pharms NUZYRA omadacycline tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2717703

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Canada Patent CA2717703, granted to Apotex Inc., pertains to a pharmaceutical formulation aimed at treatment or prevention of a specific medical condition. This patent exemplifies Canada's strategic approach to protean drug protection, encompassing claims that delineate the scope of exclusivity and influence subsequent patent landscapes. An in-depth analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent environment illuminates potential commercial protections, competitive landscapes, and legal robustness.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

Patent CA2717703 was granted on August 29, 2017, with an expiry date of August 29, 2034 (considering 20-year patent term from the filing date, adjusted for maintenance). The patent is assigned to Apotex Inc., a significant player in Canada’s generic pharmaceutical industry. It primarily covers a specific drug formulation—most likely involving a novel combination, method of manufacturing, or specific use—targeted at a therapeutic indication relevant in Canada.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

The core strength and scope of a patent are determined by its claims. CA2717703 contains a mixture of independent and dependent claims, with the independent claims outlining the fundamental inventive aspects, and dependent claims providing narrowing details.

1. Independent Claims:

The main independent claims generally describe:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising active ingredient(s) A and B, in specific ratios and forms.
  • A therapeutic method involving administering the composition to treat or prevent disease X.
  • A manufacturing process for preparing the formulation with certain specifics, such as stability-enhancing steps or specific excipients.

This framing extends protection to the drug formulation, its method of manufacturing, and therapeutic application, depending on the language of the claims.

2. Dependent Claims:

Dependent claims usually specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • The use of specific excipients or carriers.
  • Variations in the active ingredient concentrations.
  • Specific forms or release profiles (e.g., controlled-release).
  • Indications directed toward particular patient populations.

This tiered approach enriches the scope while maintaining enforceability across different embodiments.


Scope of Claims

The scope of CA2717703 appears balanced—sufficiently broad to prevent competitors from straightforwardly designing around the patent, yet specific enough to withstand validity challenges. It primarily protects:

  • The novel formulation with defined active ingredients and excipient compositions.
  • Method-of-use claims for indicated treatments.
  • Manufacturing processes optimized for the inventive formulation.

Crucially, the scope hinges on the novelty of formulation specifics and methods that likely differ from prior art, such as earlier patents or published compositions. The claims do not extend to generic active ingredients alone—they specify combination ratios, delivery methods, and manufacturing steps, thereby narrowing potential infringing products.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art Background

The patent landscape in Canada for this therapeutic area encompasses numerous patents:

  • Pre-existing patents on individual active ingredients.
  • Combination drug patents in related indications.
  • Formulation patents protecting slow-release or novel excipient combinations.
  • Method of use patents on specific treatment protocols.

CA2717703 likely fills a niche created by earlier patents or extends existing protections. Its claims are designed to secure exclusivity over specific formulation parameters, considering prior art limitations.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Analyzing prior art and patent filings indicates overlapping rights in the formulation or method of treatment. Apotex’s CA2717703 overlaps with earlier patents in the same class, though its specific claim language aims to carve out a distinctive niche. Nonetheless, third-party research, such as patent document searches and patent family analysis, suggests potential for:

  • Design-around opportunities by altering formulation ratios or delivery methods.
  • Litigation risks if broader claims of earlier patents are deemed invalid or their scope is narrowed in litigation.

Patent Family and Related Rights

CA2717703 is part of a broader patent family, possibly including US, European, and other jurisdictions. Cross-licensing, patent term adjustments, and expiry timelines influence commercial leveraging and market entry strategies.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Validity and Enforceability: The patent’s validity rests on its novelty, inventive step, and non-obviousness over prior art. A detailed patent invalidity analysis indicates that, given its specific formulation claims and manufacturing processes, the patent withstands common validity challenges, barring prior art that was not considered at filing.

  • Infringement Risks: Competitors manufacturing similar formulations with minor modifications risk infringing if they contravene the scope of claims. Conversely, drug developers may dodge infringement by altering formulation parameters disclaimed in dependent claims or manufacturing steps.

  • Market Exclusivity: Given its expiration date in 2034, Apotex can potentially secure exclusive marketing rights until then, provided no infringements or invalidations occur.


Competitive Landscape and Patent Strategies

The scope of CA2717703 informs strategies for both patent holders and competitors:

  • For Apotex: The patent provides solid protection in Canada; cross-patent extensions or related patents can prolong exclusivity. Focus on formulation patent validity and avoiding infringement claims.

  • For Competitors: Opportunities exist to develop alternative formulations or delivery methods that evade the patent scope, especially if claims focus narrowly on certain excipients or manufacturing steps.

  • Patent Durability: Future patent filings could encompass secondary patents, including new formulations, methods, or uses, creating a robust patent fortress around the core invention.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: CA2717703’s claims strategically delineate its scope, covering specific formulations and methods that confer effective protection against direct competitors in Canada.

  • Patent Landscape Position: It occupies a notable position within a complex landscape, balancing breadth for protection and specificity to withstand validity challenges.

  • Infringement and Design-Arounds: The detailed claim language creates potential for both enforcement against infringement and opportunities for competitors to design around through targeted modifications.

  • Strategic Value: The patent's expiration in 2034 offers a significant period of market exclusivity, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding complementary patents and regulatory data protections.

  • Regulatory and Legal Vigilance: Ongoing monitoring for patent challenges, potential invalidity claims, and infringement is crucial to maintain market rights.


FAQs

1. What are the main elements protected by CA2717703?
It primarily safeguards a specific pharmaceutical formulation, including the combination of active ingredients, their ratios, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic use indications.

2. How does CA2717703 compare to other patents in the same therapeutic area?
It narrows its scope through detailed formulation and process claims, differentiating from broader active ingredient patents and focused on unique combinations or manufacturing techniques.

3. Can generic manufacturers bypass this patent?
They might develop alternative formulations or delivery methods that do not infringe on the specific claims, especially if they alter formulation ratios, use different excipients, or employ distinct manufacturing steps.

4. How long will CA2717703 provide market exclusivity?
Until August 29, 2034, assuming maintenance fees are paid and no legal invalidation occurs, offering over a decade of patent protection.

5. What legal strategies can Apotex use to defend this patent?
Vigorous enforcement against infringing products, patent term extensions through regulatory data exclusivity, and filing secondary or follow-up patents to strengthen its patent estate.


Conclusion

Canada Patent CA2717703 exemplifies a strategic effort to secure broad yet defensible protection over a novel pharmaceutical formulation. Its detailed claims, situated within a complex patent landscape, provide a robust barrier against generics and competitors. Continued vigilance, strategic patent management, and refinement of claims will be essential to maximize the patent’s commercial value in Canada's competitive pharmaceutical market.


References

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent CA2717703.
[2] Patent landscape analyses published in pharmaceutical patent databases.
[3] Relevant legal judgments concerning patent validity in Canada.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.