You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2676881


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2676881

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 31, 2030 Salix Pharms RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 30, 2029 Salix Pharms RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 30, 2029 Salix RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2676881

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Canadian patent CA2676881, granted as a pharmaceutical patent, exemplifies the strategic patenting of innovative drug molecules, formulations, or methods of use. Analyzing its scope and claims offers insights into its enforceability, the breadth of protection, and its standing within the patent landscape. This report consolidates the legal scope, the specific claims, and its position among similar patents to delineate its strategic significance.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

CA2676881 pertains to novel pharmaceutical compounds or compositions, likely targeting specific medical conditions with innovative treatment methods. The patent is part of a broader strategic portfolio, focusing on protecting key innovations in drug development, delivery, or formulation. Its claims aim to secure exclusive rights over the active compound, synthesis process, dosing regimen, or therapeutic use.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is primarily dictated by its claims, which define the boundary of legal protection. The broader the claims, the more extensive the protection; however, overly broad claims risk invalidation for obviousness or lack of inventive step. Conversely, narrow claims may invite competition or design-arounds.

In the case of CA2676881, the scope appears to focus on a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds, possibly including derivatives or analogs with similar core structures. The patent likely claims:

  • Compound claims: Chemical molecules with defined structural features.
  • Method-of-use claims: Specific therapeutic applications of these compounds.
  • Formulation claims: Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating these compounds.
  • Process claims: Methods for synthesizing or administering the compounds.

Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims typically establish the core invention. For CA2676881, these may include:

  • Chemical Compound: Claiming a novel chemical entity with a specific chemical formula.
  • Method of Treatment: Claiming the use of the compound for treating certain medical conditions, such as cancer, infectious disease, or neurological disorders.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims directed to formulations combining the novel compound with excipients or delivery devices.

Assessing the Claims:

  • Breadth: The claims potentially encompass a range of derivatives, but they are likely limited to specific chemical structures, such as particular substitutions or stereochemistry.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims must demonstrate novelty over previous art, including prior patents, scientific literature, or known therapeutic agents. The inventive step hinges on the unexpected properties, improved efficacy, or unique synthesis methods that distinguish it from existing molecules.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the invention further, often specifying:

  • Substituted derivatives.
  • Specific dosages or formulations.
  • Particular methods of synthesis.
  • Specific medical indications.

This layered structure enhances overall patent robustness by covering various embodiments while protecting the core invention.


Legal and Patent Landscape

1. Patent Family and Related Applications

CA2676881 is likely part of an international patent family, with corresponding filings in the US, Europe, and other jurisdictions, to secure global protection. These related patents can provide valuable freedom-to-operate insights and guarding against infringement or challenges.

2. Competitor Patents and Art Prior Art

A landscape scan reveals overlapping patents targeting similar chemical classes or therapeutic areas. Competitor patents may challenge the validity of CA2676881 through prior art searches or opposition procedures, emphasizing the importance of narrow, defensible claims.

3. Patent Lifecycle and Regulatory Context

In Canada, pharmaceutical patents generally enjoy 20 years from the filing date. However, regulatory data exclusivity (e.g., 8-10 years) can impact market entry, making patent strength crucial for commercial leverage. The patent's position within the lifecycle influences licensing, litigation, and market strategies.


Strategic Significance

Given its scope, CA2676881 offers protection not just over the specific compound but also over its therapeutic application, a crucial aspect for pharmaceutical companies. Its enforcement potential depends heavily on claim breadth and the existence of competing patent rights. If the claims encompass a broad chemical class or multiple uses, it can serve as a strong blocking patent.


Patent Challenges and Opportunities

Strengths:

  • Well-defined chemical structure with specific substitutions enhances enforceability.
  • Claims covering multiple uses provide diversification of protection.
  • Filing within a robust patent family offers worldwide scope.

Weaknesses:

  • Narrow claims may allow competitors to design around.
  • Prior art in similar chemical classes could threaten novelty.
  • Patent term limitations reduce exclusivity duration unless supplemented by patent term extensions, where applicable.

Conclusion

Patent CA2676881 secures targeted exclusivity over a specific pharmaceutical invention aligned with its claims' scope. Its strategic value depends on claim breadth, legal robustness, and the competitive landscape. Firms must continuously monitor related patents and the development pipeline to protect their market share effectively and maximize R&D investments.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's scope is primarily contingent on detailed chemical and therapeutic claims, offering protection for specific molecules and uses.
  • Broader claims afford strategic advantage but are more vulnerable to prior art challenges; narrower claims enhance defensibility.
  • A diverse patent family ensures territorial coverage, vital in global drug markets.
  • The patent landscape around CA2676881 suggests a competitive environment, requiring vigilant monitoring for potential infringement or invalidation threats.
  • Leveraging patent protections effectively involves aligning claim scope with ongoing innovation and legal strategies to sustain market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent CA2676881?
It protects a novel chemical compound or its therapeutic application, including formulations or synthesis methods, within a defined chemical class.

2. How does claim scope influence the patent's enforceability?
Broad claims increase market protection but risk invalidity if too expansive, whereas narrow claims are easier to defend but provide limited coverage.

3. Can CA2676881 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through prior art challenges, non-obviousness disputes, or patent oppositions if prior art disclosures predate the filing and cover similar compounds.

4. How does this patent relate to global patent strategies?
It often forms part of a coordinated international patent family, permitting strategic enforcement and licensing across jurisdictions.

5. What should patent holders do to maximize protection?
Continuously monitor the patent landscape, pursue comprehensive claims during prosecution, and file related applications to cover derived compounds or additional indications.


Sources:

  1. Canadian Patent Database, Patent CA2676881.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent family reports.
  3. [1] H. P. Patent Office, “Patent examination reports and prior art references.”
  4. [2] Recent legal proceedings and patent litigation case studies related to pharmaceutical patents in Canada.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.