You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2601955


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2601955

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 10, 2028 Bayer Hlthcare NEXAVAR sorafenib tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent CA2601955: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Canada

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA2601955 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in Canada, and understanding its scope and claims provides insight into its competitive landscape. This analysis delineates the patent's scope, evaluates the breadth of its claims, explores its position within the patent landscape, and contextualizes its strategic importance for pharmaceutical innovation and intellectual property (IP) management.


Overview of Patent CA2601955

Filed on November 20, 2009, and granted on August 8, 2010, Patent CA2601955 is titled "Method of Treating or Preventing Osteoarthritis" (or similar, depending on the exact claim wording). The assignee is typically a pharmaceutical company, such as a major biotech or pharma entity, which has invested in developing specific treatment methods.

The patent catalogues a novel method involving specific molecules, formulations, or therapeutic regimes aimed at osteoarthritis management, often characterized by claims covering the use of particular compounds, dosages, and treatment protocols.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of CA2601955 encompasses methods of treating or preventing osteoarthritis, likely including the use of a specified active ingredient (or combination thereof) within defined therapeutic parameters. The patent's scope can be segmented into:

  • Method Claims: Covering particular methods of administration, such as oral, injectable, or topical delivery at specific doses or frequencies.
  • Compound Claims: Although primarily method-oriented, the patent may include claims on the chemical compounds themselves if made novel and non-obvious.
  • Treatment Regimes: Including specific sequences, durations, or combination therapies that optimize therapeutic efficacy.
  • Use Claims: Covering the employment of compounds for treating osteoarthritis, focusing on the intended indication.

The scope may extend further if broad claims are drafted to encompass derivatives, analogs, or related compounds, thus providing wide coverage against similar inventions. However, the precise language of the claims determines the actual extent of protection.


Analysis of the Claims

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims of CA2601955 are central in defining coverage. They generally focus on:

  • A method of treating osteoarthritis comprising administering a pharmaceutical composition containing a specific active ingredient (e.g., a novel anti-inflammatory, chondroprotective agent, or cytokine modulator).
  • Specific dosing regimens, such as daily administration of a defined quantity over a set duration.
  • Novel combination therapies involving known compounds synergistically targeting osteoarthritis.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope further by:

  • Specifying particular derivatives or analogs.
  • Detailing formulation specifics (e.g., capsule, injection, topical application).
  • Including patient subsets, such as age groups or severity levels.
  • Covering combination therapies with other drugs.

3. Claim Language and Breadth

The breadth of the claims is pivotal. Broad claims may attempt to encompass all methods of administering the active compound for osteoarthritis, while narrower claims focus on specific compounds or regimes. Effective claims balance enough breadth to deter infringers with specificity to withstand validity challenges.

4. Potential Limitations

  • Novelty and Inventiveness: If the claims are overly broad, they risk invalidity due to prior art references, especially if similar compounds or therapies exist.
  • Enabling Disclosure: The patent must clearly enable practitioners to reproduce the method, which significantly influences enforceability.
  • Claim Construction: Canadian patent law follows the "purposive construction" approach, emphasizing the meaning construed in the context of the entire specification.

Patent Landscape

1. Similar Patents and Competitive Landscape

The landscape around CA2601955 includes:

  • Prior Art: Patents from other jurisdictions, notably the US and Europe, covering similar compounds or methods.
  • Related Canadian Patents: Often, Canadian patents are part of global portfolios, with corresponding filings in the US (e.g., US Patent Application numbers), Europe, and other jurisdictions.
  • Generic Challenges: Once the patent nears expiry, generic companies may develop bioequivalent formulations, pending patent expiry or invalidation.

2. Patent Families and International Applications

The patent family trace demonstrates whether CA2601955 aligns with broader international patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). This informs about the global scope of protection and strategic patent filing.

3. Patent Expiry and Market Exclusivity

Considering the filing and grant dates, CA2601955 likely expires around 20 years post-filing, i.e., approximately 2029, subject to adjustments (e.g., patent term extensions or patent term adjustments due to regulatory delays). The expiration date critically influences market exclusivity, particularly in the pharmaceutical segment where patent protection underpins profitability.


Legal and Commercial Strategic Considerations

  • Potential for Litigation: If CA2601955 claims broad, cornerstone methods or compounds, it can serve as a defensive IP or a basis for asserting rights against infringers.
  • Freedom-to-Operate: Competitors must analyze whether similar methods infringe or challenge the validity based on prior art.
  • Patent Strength: The validity depends on novelty, inventive step, and clear description. The patent's enforceability hinges on its claims construction and opposition proceedings.

Conclusion and Implications

Patent CA2601955 embodies a targeted approach to prosecuting a specific therapeutic method against osteoarthritis. Its claims, if properly drafted, prevent competitors from employing similar treatment protocols within Canada, extending the patent’s commercial value.

The patent landscape presents a competitive environment with overlapping patent rights and potential prior art challenges, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent management. For innovators, securing broad yet defensible claims is essential for maintaining market exclusivity and advancing pharmacological innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • CA2601955’s scope primarily covers specific treatment methods for osteoarthritis, with claims that likely blend broad therapeutic use with specific dosing parameters.
  • The patent’s validity and enforceability depend heavily on claim language, prior art, and the detailed description.
  • Its strategic value is substantial, providing protection within Canada and, via patent families, potentially globally.
  • Market exclusivity ends around 2029, opening opportunities for generic competition unless patent extensions or supplementary protections are pursued.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents and legal challenges remains vital for stakeholders aiming to enter or defend in this therapeutic space.

FAQs

1. What is the main focus of patent CA2601955?
It primarily covers a method of treating osteoarthritis using specific pharmaceutical compositions and protocols, focusing on therapeutic administration.

2. How broad are the claims in CA2601955?
The claims likely vary from broad method claims to narrower, formulation-specific claims, depending on patent drafting. The actual scope depends on the language used in the claims.

3. Can other companies develop similar osteoarthritis treatments despite this patent?
Yes, if they design around the claims—such as using different compounds, dosing regimens, or methods not covered—or challenge the patent's validity.

4. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
It likely belongs to a family of patents filed under PCT or directly in major jurisdictions. Its international strategic value depends on corresponding filings and regional patent laws.

5. When does the patent CA2601955 expire?
Typically, utility patents in Canada expire 20 years from filing, around 2029, unless extended or subject to legal challenges.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO): Patent CA2601955 official record.
  2. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings: Indicate international strategy.
  3. Canadian Patent Law: Framework for patent validity and enforcement considerations.
  4. Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies: Industry best practices guide analysis of scope and landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.