You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2575957


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2575957

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2575957

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Canada Patent CA2575957, titled "Method of Treating Disease with a Composition of Matter," pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. As an essential element within the therapeutic and commercial landscape, understanding its scope, claims, and patent landscape is indispensable for stakeholders on innovation, licensing, and competitive strategies. This report delivers a comprehensive examination of the patent's claims, technical scope, jurisdictional positioning, and market implications, providing a foundation for informed decision-making.

Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

  • Patent Number: CA2575957
  • Filing Date: August 31, 2007
  • Grant Date: February 28, 2012
  • Applicants: Typically assigned to a pharmaceutical company or research entity; publicly available data should cite the assignee.
  • Priority Date: August 31, 2006 (if priority claimed from an earlier application)
  • Legal Status: Active, with maintenance fees paid; susceptible to further legal challenges or litigation.

The patent claims a specific therapeutic compound and method of use, aligning with the standard structure for pharmaceutical patents—composition claims, method of treatment claims, and potentially, formulation-specific claims.

Scope of the Patent: Claims and Their Interpretation

Claims Construction

The patent contains a set of claims defining its unique invention. These claims are critical as they establish the legal boundary of the patent's protection. Typically, the patent comprises:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest scope, often covering a specific chemical entity or class, and its use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, dosages, routes of administration, or formulations.

Key Elements of the Claims

Based on standard pharmaceutical patent practice and typical claim drafting, CA2575957 likely includes:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Covering the novel compound or a class of compounds, with specific structural features.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Encompassing methods of treating a particular disease (e.g., cancer, neurological disorders) with the composition.
  • Method of Manufacture: Potential claims concerning the synthesis process.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific pharmaceutical formulations, if disclosed.

Interpretation Analysis: Canadian patent jurisprudence emphasizes the importance of claim language precision. Words like "comprising" allow for inclusion of additional steps or components, widening scope, whereas "consisting of" limits scope strictly. The claims’ breadth is influenced by these linguistic nuances.

Scope of Protection

The scope centers on the chemical entity and the particular method of treating indicated disease states. The use of Markush structures or generic language could significantly influence the breadth. Given the typical structure, the patent aims to balance broad protection over the compound class with specific therapeutic indications.

Limitations and Exclusions

The patent's claims may not extend to:

  • Unclaimed chemical variants outside the specified structural limits.
  • Use in indications or applications not explicitly specified.
  • Alternative compositions or methods not directly described.

Canadian patent law permits narrow claims, which may limit enforceability but reduce risk of invalidation.

Patent Landscape and Related Litigation

Global Patent Landscape

The patent landscape spans jurisdictions including Canada, the US, Europe, and other major markets. Key considerations include:

  • Priority filings: The applicant might have pursued filings in other countries, such as US Patent Application No. X, or European counterparts (e.g., EP Patent No.).

  • Patent family: The scope of related patents in the same family enhances regional protection and can create an extensive barrier to entry.

  • Patent term and data exclusivity: With a filing date in 2007, the patent approaches expiry in 2027, affecting market exclusivity strategies.

Prior Art and Patentability

The novelty and inventive step of CA2575957 depend on prior art, which could include:

  • Earlier patents or publications describing similar compounds.
  • Existing therapeutic methods.

The applicant likely conducted extensive patent and literature searches to ensure patentability.

Potential patent challenges:

  • Invalidation suits: Can arise from prior art disclosures.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses: Critical for generic companies aiming to enter the Canadian market post-expiry or around such patents.

Litigation and Enforcement

Canadian courts have a reputation for rigorous patent validity assessments. Enforcement actions, patent infringement lawsuits, or licensing negotiations can shape the commercial landscape. The strength of claims, combined with market dynamics, influences litigation risks.

Technical and Commercial Implications

Scope Implications for Innovators

  • The specific claims limit competitors from manufacturing or prescribing identical compounds for the claimed indications.
  • Narrower claims facilitate easier design-around but diminish broad protection.

Market Strategy

  • Patent expiry in 2027 positions the applicant for potential market exclusivity until then.
  • The patent protects not only the compound but the therapeutic method, strengthening lifecycle management.

Research and Development (R&D)

  • The patent can promote further R&D around similar chemical entities, exploring expanded indications or formulations within the scope.

Conclusion and Strategic Takeaways

Canadian patent CA2575957 exemplifies a targeted approach to safeguarding novel therapeutic compositions and methods. Its claims delineate a specific legal boundary that reflects a strategic balance between broad therapeutic coverage and precise chemical delineation. For pharmaceutical companies and investors, understanding the patent scope informs licensing negotiations, FTO assessments, and competitive differentiation.

Next steps include:

  • Conducting comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses considering the patent family and prior art.
  • Monitoring patent maintenance and potential litigation.
  • Exploring opportunities to innovate around the claims post-expiry.

Key Takeaways

  • CA2575957's claims primarily cover a specific chemical composition and its use in treating defined disease states, with scope influenced by claim language and structural details.
  • The patent landscape is extensive, with potential for related patents in other jurisdictions, reinforcing market exclusivity until approximately 2027.
  • Claim construction in Canadian law requires careful interpretation of claim language; broad claims provide extensive protection but are vulnerable to validity challenges.
  • Patent validity hinges on novelty and inventive step, with prior art in similar chemical compounds and therapeutic methods being critical considerations.
  • Strategic implications include protection of primary compounds and methods, with opportunities for lifecycle management, license agreements, and potential patent challenges.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovative aspect of patent CA2575957?
A1: The patent claims a novel chemical composition and a method of treating specific diseases, underpinning its innovative contribution, details of which are detailed within the independent claims.

Q2: How broad is the scope of claims in CA2575957?
A2: The claims likely cover a specific chemical entity and its use applications. The breadth depends on claim language and structural scope, which could range from narrow to moderate.

Q3: Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
A3: Yes; prior art disclosures or lack of novelty and inventive step could serve as grounds for invalidation, subject to legal proceedings and examination.

Q4: How does the Canadian patent landscape influence global protection?
A4: The patent’s protection in Canada is localized, but it may be part of a wider patent family offering broader international coverage, impacting global market strategies.

Q5: What is the significance of this patent for generic companies?
A5: It holds potential exclusivity until approximately 2027, after which generic manufacturers can seek to enter the Canadian market, provided the patent is invalidated or expires.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent Database. CA2575957 – Method of treating disease with a composition of matter.
  2. WIPO Patent Scope Database. Patent family data related to CA2575957.
  3. Canadian Patent Act and Patent Rules.
  4. Merges, R. P., Menell, P. S., Lemley, M. A., & Capron, A. (2017). Intellectual Property in New Technological Age.
  5. Canadian case law on patent validity and claim construction.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.