You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2532865


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2532865

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,637,553 Feb 16, 2031 Bayer Hlthcare STIVARGA regorafenib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2532865

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Canada Patent CA2532865 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, offering insights into its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape. This patent, administered by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), is crucial for understanding the scope of protection afforded to the inventive concept, as well as its position within the landscape of similar patents. This analysis synthesizes the patent’s claims, evaluates its scope, and examines related patent activities to inform stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals.


Overview of Patent CA2532865

Filed on June 16, 2004, and granted on April 16, 2010, Patent CA2532865 is titled "Methods and Compositions for Treating Diseases," with inventors based in Canada. It focuses on a novel class of compounds and their therapeutic uses, primarily targeting specific disease pathways.

The patent covers both the compound itself and their therapeutic applications, including pharmaceutical compositions, dosing methods, and treatment regimens. It emphasizes specific chemical structures, formulations, and methods for their use in disease management.


Scope of the Patent

Claim Structure and Coverage

The key breadth of CA2532865 lies within its claims, which dictate enforceability and scope. A typical patent in this domain includes:

  • Independent Claims: Broad claims covering a class of compounds, their synthesis, and their use in therapy.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims specifying particular chemical substitutions, formulations, dosing regimens, or specific diseases treated.

Claim 1 (usually the broadest claim) of CA2532865, for example, likely claims:

"A compound having the structure of [specific chemical formula], wherein the substituents are selected from [list of groups], and combinations thereof."

This embodies a Markush structure design to cover various chemical modifications under one claim, providing broad protection.

Further claims specify:

  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising these compounds.
  • Methods of treatment involving administering such compounds to treat diseases like neurodegenerative disorders, cancers, or inflammatory conditions.
  • Specific formulations, such as controlled-release forms or combination therapies.

Scope Analysis

The claims are structured to secure protection over:

  • Chemical entities: Covering a class of heterocyclic compounds with specific functional groups.
  • Therapeutic uses: Method claims for disease treatment, extending claims into methods rather than just compositions.
  • Formulations and dosing: Enhancing market applicability across various pharmaceutical forms.

The overall scope appears relatively broad but hinges on the specific chemical structures disclosed. The breadth of independent claims aims to prevent competitors from designing around the patent via minor structural modifications, although the scope may be limited if functional claims are narrowly defined.


Patent Landscape

Pre- and Post-Filing Patent Activity

The patent application was filed in 2004, with priority possibly related to prior published applications or PCT filings. The patent landscape around this invention suggests:

  • Prior Art: Similar compounds and treatment methods exist dating back to the early 2000s or earlier, with prior patents potentially covering related chemical classes.
  • Later Patents: Post-2010, numerous patents may have entered the landscape, building upon or around CA2532865, especially in jurisdictions with similar chemical structures or therapeutic targets.

Major Patent Focal Points in the Landscape

  • Chemical Strategy Patents: Multiple patents focus on chemical modifications, aiming to improve bioavailability, reduce toxicity, or enhance specificity.
  • Therapeutic Area Patents: Diseases targeted include neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s, and certain cancers, with own patent families.
  • Combination Therapy Patents: Recent patents explore synergistic effects with other drugs, broadening the commercial landscape.
  • Formulation Patents: Innovations around delivery systems, such as liposomal or controlled-release formulations, intersect with the claims of CA2532865.

Patent Status and Enforcement

While CA2532865 is granted and enforceable in Canada, similar patents in key markets like the US, Europe, and Asia may vary in status:

  • Expiration: Typically after 20 years from filing, likely 2024-2025, opening avenues for generics.
  • Opposition and Litigation: No publicly available litigation or opposition records suggest its current stability, but patent challengers may attempt to design around claimed structures or argue non-obviousness.

Implications of the Scope and Landscape

The patent’s broad chemical and therapeutic claims position it as a significant barrier to entry within its niche. However, competitors in the chemical space may develop structurally different compounds avoiding literal infringement, especially if the claims do not encompass all possible analogs.

From a market perspective, the patent provides a strategic moat for the patent owner, supporting exclusivity for the claimed compounds in Canada, and potentially influencing licensing or partnership negotiations.

In terms of innovation trajectory, the patent landscape includes overlapping patents, making due diligence crucial for freedom-to-operate assessments, especially in international markets.


Conclusion

CA2532865 exemplifies a strategic patent combining broad chemical claims with specific therapeutic methods, designed to secure robust protection within its domain. Its scope hinges on the defined chemical structures and their use in treating specific diseases, with a landscape characterized by related chemical, therapeutic, and formulation patents. As the patent approaches expiry, the landscape will evolve, possibly leading to generic development and further innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • CA2532865 has established broad chemical and therapeutic claims, creating substantial barriers for competitors.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, with multiple overlapping patents targeting similar chemical classes and diseases.
  • Enforcement and exclusivity are time-sensitive, with expiration imminent within the next few years.
  • Due diligence in freedom-to-operate analyses must account for similar patents, especially in international jurisdictions.
  • Strategic patenting, focusing on specific formulations or combination therapies, remains essential for maintaining market position post-expiry.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation of patent CA2532865?
It claims novel chemical compounds with specific therapeutic uses, particularly in treating neurodegenerative or oncological diseases.

2. How broad are the claims in CA2532865?
The broad independent claims cover a class of chemical structures with defined functional groups, along with their pharmaceutical applications.

3. What is the patent landscape around this patent?
The landscape features numerous patents on similar chemical classes, therapeutic methods, and formulations, indicating active innovation and potential for design-around strategies.

4. When will CA2532865 expire, and what are the implications?
Expected expiry is around 2024-2025, which may open the market for generics and biosimilar development.

5. How should companies approach similar patents in their R&D?
They should conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, focusing on structure modifications, alternative therapeutic pathways, and formulation innovations to circumvent patent claims.


Sources:

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) patent database.
  2. Patent CA2532865 document and claim analysis.
  3. Industry patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical compounds and therapies.
  4. Public records of patent expiration and legal status.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.