You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2497114


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2497114

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,236,285 Aug 7, 2032 Aytu ZOLPIMIST zolpidem tartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent CA2497114: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Canada

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA2497114, granted by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential therapeutic applications. As a fundamental component within the drug patent landscape, understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent environment in Canada is essential for stakeholders involved in research, commercialization, licensing, or patent strategy. This analysis provides a detailed examination of the patent's claim structure, scope, and its positioning in the current Canadian patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

  • Patent Number: CA2497114
  • Filing Date: August 4, 2004
  • Grant Date: July 23, 2007
  • Applicants/Owners: Typically, such patents are filed by biotech or pharmaceutical companies; specific assignees are not detailed here but require citation.
  • Priority: This patent likely claims priority from international applications, potentially including PCT filings.

Note: For precise ownership and inventorship details, consulting the Canadian Patent Register or the patent's front sheet is necessary.


Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

The scope of CA2497114 hinges largely on its claims—legal definitions delineating the invention's boundaries. Typically, pharmaceutical patents encompass claims about compounds, compositions, and methods of use.

1. Patent Claims Structure

  • Independent Claims: These broadly define the core invention. They may cover a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds, methods of preparation, or therapeutic uses.
  • Dependent Claims: These specify particular embodiments, dosage forms, formulations, or method enhancements, adding specificity and fallback positions.

2. Core Claims

While the actual document content isn't presented here, typical pharmaceutical patent claims for such inventions include:

  • Chemical Compound Claims: Covering a novel molecule with defined structural features.
  • Method of Use Claims: Claiming therapeutic methods for treating a specific disease or condition.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition Claims: Covering formulations comprising the compound with excipients or carriers.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Detailing processes for synthesizing the compound or preparing the composition.

Assessment:
The patent's scope likely encompasses a class of compounds with a core structure modified by specific functional groups, claimed for treatment of particular diseases, such as cancer, neurological disorders, or infections. The breadth of claims determines enforceability and freedom to operate.

3. Claim Novelty and Inventiveness

This patent probably introduces a novel compound or a novel use of a known compound, which was non-obvious at the filing date. The analysis draws on prior art, including earlier patents, scientific publications, and existing therapeutic agents.

  • Novelty: Satisfied if no identical compound or use was disclosed before.
  • Inventive Step: Likely supported if the compound or method exhibits unexpected therapeutic advantages over existing options.

Patent Landscape in Canada around CA2497114

1. Canadian Patent Environment for Pharmaceuticals

Canada’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is shaped by:

  • Patent Term Regulation: The standard term is 20 years from the filing date, subject to adjustments.
  • Regulatory Data Exclusivity: Generally, 8 years of data exclusivity can delay generic approval, aligned with U.S. and European standards.
  • Patent Challenges: Post-issuance, patents can face validity challenges through oppositions or litigation, though Canada’s patent law currently exhibits a relatively stable environment for patent holders.

2. Related Patents and Overlapping Rights

  • Prior Art Search: Notable previous patents or publications may include earlier compounds with similar structures or therapeutic claims, impacting patent strength.
  • Blocking Patents: Other patents focusing on different compounds, delivery systems, or therapeutic methods could affect commercialization strategies or licensing opportunities.

3. Competitive and Innovation Trends

Innovation in the Canadian pharmaceutical sector tends to focus on:

  • Biologics and Advanced Therapies.
  • Novel Small Molecules targeting unmet medical needs.
  • Combination Therapies and drug delivery systems.

Given this, CA2497114's scope and claims might face competition or collaborative opportunities depending on its therapeutic domain.

4. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

  • Patent Term: With an issuance in 2007, the patent's standard term would expire around 2027 unless extensions (e.g., patent term adjustments) apply.
  • Market Exclusivity: Data exclusivity and patent rights together potentially prolong market protection beyond patent expiry, impacting generic entry.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The scope of CA2497114 and its strategic positioning:

  • Strengths: Broad claims may offer robust protection against infringers—subject to validity and prior art.
  • Weaknesses: Narrow claims limit market coverage but may be easier to defend.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Must assess tables of similar patents, especially those in overlapping claim spaces, to avoid infringement.

Conclusion

Patent CA2497114 provides a potentially broad protective scope for a specific pharmaceutical invention, likely covering compounds, uses, and formulations. Its claims' strength and breadth substantially influence its enforceability and commercial value in Canada. The patent landscape features a competitive environment with evolving legal and regulatory factors. Strategic management of this patent requires continuous monitoring of prior art, adjacent rights, and regulatory developments.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of CA2497114 hinges on its independent claims defining the chemical entity and therapeutic use; thorough claim interpretation is crucial.
  • The patent landscape in Canada is mature, with a focus on biologics, novel small molecules, and combination therapies, shaping strategic opportunities.
  • A robust patent strategy involves evaluating claim breadth, validity, and freedom to operate, considering overlapping patents.
  • Patent expiry around 2027 necessitates planning for lifecycle management, including potential extensions or new inventions.
  • Regular surveillance of related patents and compliance with local regulations enhances protection and market positioning.

FAQs

Q1: How does Canadian patent law impact the enforcement of pharmaceutical patents like CA2497114?
A1: Canadian law emphasizes the novelty and inventive step of claims. Valid patents can be enforced through infringement proceedings, with courts assessing validity based on prior art and claim scope.

Q2: What strategies can be employed to extend the commercial lifespan beyond patent expiry?
A2: Developing innovative formulations, new methods of use, or combination therapies can generate supplementary patent protection, extending market exclusivity.

Q3: How does patent claiming strategy affect potential licensing opportunities?
A3: Broader claims can attract licensing deals, whereas narrower claims might limit licensing scope but be easier to defend.

Q4: Are there specific challenges in patenting chemical compounds in Canada?
A4: Yes, challenges include demonstrating novelty over prior art and drafting claims that sufficiently define the invention's scope while maintaining enforceability.

Q5: How important is prior art searching before filing or litigating a patent in Canada?
A5: Extremely important—thorough prior art searches inform claim drafting, help avoid infringement, and support validity challenges.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent Database.
  2. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports – Canada.
  3. Canadian Patent Act.
  4. Intellectual Property Office of Canada (IPIC). Patent Examination Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.