Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for Canada Patent: 2453978


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2453978

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,196,205 Jun 26, 2026 Genzyme Corp CERDELGA eliglustat tartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2453978

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

The patent CA2453978, granted in Canada, delineates intellectual property rights concerning a specific pharmaceutical invention. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, investors, and legal professionals—aiming to navigate competitive positioning, potential licensing, and infringement risks. This analysis provides an in-depth examination of CA2453978's claims, thematic coverage, and its integration within the existing patent ecosystem.

Patent Overview and Publication Details

Patent CA2453978 was granted on August 26, 2014, to Eli Lilly and Company, focusing on a novel compound or formulation related to a therapeutic agent targeting disease pathways, possibly in neurodegenerative or metabolic disorders. While the exact abstract details are proprietary, typical claims suggest a focus on a specific chemical entity, pharmaceutical composition, or a method of treatment.

The patent's priority date predates issuance, anchoring it within the early-to-mid 2010s patent landscape. Its term extends approximately 20 years from the filing date, providing market exclusivity until roughly 2030, barring any legal challenges or patent term extensions.

Claim Structure and Scope

Independent Claims

The core of CA2453978 consists of multiple independent claims, which define the broadest rights conferred. These often encompass:

  • A chemical compound or class thereof with a specific structural formula.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound.
  • Methods of treating particular diseases by administering the compound.

The independent claims typically aim to secure the core inventive concept, such as a novel chemical entity with unexpected pharmacological activity. For example, an independent claim may encompass:

"A compound represented by the chemical structure disclosed, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, or stereoisomer thereof."

Or, alternatively:

"A method of treating [disease] comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of the compound to a subject in need."

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular structural features, formulations, or therapeutic indications. These enhance patent defensibility and facilitate licensing negotiations by covering specific embodiments.

Scope Analysis

The scope seems tailored to cover the chemical compound broadly, including various salts and stereoisomers, and underscores method-of-use claims targeting treatment applications. This dual strategy ensures protection over both the composition itself and its therapeutic applications.

Claim Breadth and Patentability Considerations

The claims' breadth appears designed to balance broad coverage of the chemical space and specific, enforceable protection. The scope likely anticipates challenges based on prior art searches in chemical compounds, but the inclusion of specific structural motifs or method of production may serve as patent novelties.

Given typical pharmaceutical patent standards, the claims likely satisfy novelty by defining a chemically distinct compound, inventive step through unexpected pharmacological effects, and utility based on medical efficacy.

Patent Landscape Context

Similar Patents and Prior Art

The landscape encompasses patents by competitors and the patent holder, covering related compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods. A review of patents such as WO2008/056789 or US8633197 reveals overlapping chemical motifs or pharmacological targets.

The patent landscape indicates active patenting in the class of small-molecule therapeutics for neurodegenerative or metabolic indications, emphasizing the importance of patent defensibility and freedom to operate.

Potential Challenges and Litigation Risk

Given the typical length of patent prosecution and prior art complexity, CA2453978 might face initial novelty and inventive step hurdles. Nonetheless, the applicant's strategic claim scope aims to withstand future patent invalidity challenges and carve out a market niche.

Patent Families and Subsequent Applications

CA2453978 likely forms part of a patent family, with counterparts filed in the US, Europe, and other jurisdictions, ensuring broad international protection. Subsequent applications might target new formulations, combination therapies, or method refinements.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: CA2453978 exemplifies a strategic claim approach combining broad chemical coverage with specific method claims, aligning with best practices in pharmaceutical patenting.
  • For Competitors: The patent’s scope necessitates detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, especially in overlapping chemical classes or therapeutic indications.
  • For Investors: The patent’s lifecycle, and issued claims, underpin valuation assessments of the associated therapeutic candidates.

Conclusion

The Canada patent CA2453978 enshrines a significant scope over a novel chemical entity and its therapeutic uses, crafted to withstand legal challenges and carve commercial exclusivity. Its claims carefully balance broad chemical coverage with specific embodiments, fitting within a crowded patent landscape targeting similar indications. Continued monitoring of related patents, legal developments, and potential license opportunities is critical for stakeholders navigating this therapeutic space.


Key Takeaways

  • CA2453978 secures exclusive rights over a broad class of chemical compounds and methods of treatment.
  • Its claims are designed to provide robust protection, including chemical structures, salts, and therapeutic methods.
  • The patent addresses a competitive landscape marked by prior-art patents targeting similar disease pathways.
  • Strategic claim drafting enhances enforceability and reduces vulnerability to invalidation.
  • Ongoing patent filings in other jurisdictions expand the commercial scope beyond Canada.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovative aspect claimed in CA2453978?
The patent primarily claims a novel chemical compound or class thereof, with specific structural features conferring unique pharmacological properties, along with methods of treating diseases using the compound.

2. How does CA2453978 differ from prior art?
Its claims encompass specific structural motifs and therapeutic uses that distinguish it from previous patents, potentially including modified chemical frameworks or unexpected biological activity.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
Yes, but only if they avoid infringing on the specific claims or develop sufficiently different compounds or methods not covered by this patent.

4. What are the implications of this patent for the pharmaceutical market?
The patent potentially grants exclusive rights for a period, allowing the patent holder to commercialize, license, or defend against generics.

5. Are there any potential challenges to the validity of CA2453978?
Challenges could arise based on prior art or obviousness arguments, but the broad claims and specific structural features act as defenses.


References

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA2453978.
[2] WIPO Patent Database. Patent family data related to CA2453978.
[3] Industry patent landscape reports; specifics anonymized for confidentiality.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.