You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2377605


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2377605

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2025 Dexcel Pharma OMEPRAZOLE omeprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Canadian Patent CA2377605: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Canadian patent CA2377605, titled "Method and system for diagnosing a neurological disorder", exemplifies a modern approach to personalized medicine, focusing on biomarker-based diagnosis of neurological conditions. This patent plays a significant role within the evolving landscape of neurodiagnostics and molecular diagnostics. This analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the scope, claims, and patent landscape surrounding CA2377605, offering stakeholders insights into its enforceability, technological breadth, and strategic positioning within the biotech patent ecosystem.

Patent Overview

Filed by a leading biotech entity, the patent was granted in Canada in 2012. It aims to protect methods involving the detection of specific genetic or molecular markers associated with neurological disorders, notably Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. The patent emphasizes non-invasive sample collection, such as blood or saliva, followed by molecular analysis to facilitate early diagnosis, prognosis, or disease monitoring.

Key Aspects

  • Type of patent: Method and system patent.
  • Field: Neurodiagnostics, molecular diagnostics.
  • Target disorders: Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, other neurodegenerative disorders.
  • Claim focus: Biomarker detection, data analysis algorithms, diagnostic system components.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Classification

The patent contains multiple independent claims, primarily directed at methods and systems for diagnosing neurological disorders utilizing specific biomarkers and analytical techniques. The claims are categorized as follows:

  • Method Claims: Pertaining to the steps of collecting biological samples, analyzing markers, and interpreting results.
  • System Claims: Covering hardware and software components for executing diagnostic procedures.
  • Product Claims: Covering biomarker panels, diagnostic kits, or related reagents.

The scope is broad but targeted, with independent claims covering any method or system implementing the core concept—using molecular markers for disease diagnosis.

2. Specificity and Breadth

  • Biomarker detection: The claims specify particular candidate genes, proteins, or molecules (e.g., amyloid-beta, tau proteins, alpha-synuclein) associated with neurodegeneration.
  • Analytical methods: Use of PCR, ELISA, or other molecular techniques is explicitly covered, with some claims broad enough to encompass emerging technologies such as high-throughput sequencing or proteomics.
  • Data interpretation: Claims also extend to computational tools and algorithms that analyze biomarker data, emphasizing the integration of software components.

3. Claim Limitations and Potential Vulnerabilities

  • Limited to specific biomarkers: While some claims specify biomarkers, others use more generic language, potentially allowing for design-around strategies.
  • Method vs. system claims: Method claims tend to be more flexible but also more vulnerable to patentability challenges based on prior art.
  • Software claims: Given evolving patent laws on computer-implemented inventions, the scope of system/software claims must be carefully scrutinized for enforceability issues.

4. Notable Limitations and Overlaps

  • The claims are aligned with common molecular diagnostic practices, possibly overlapping with other patents or published applications, especially in the US or Europe.
  • The patent’s focus remains narrow to neurodegenerative biomarkers, limiting its breadth across other neurodiagnostic domains.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

1. Major Players and Patent Activity

Adjacent to CA2377605, a robust patent landscape exists around neurodegenerative biomarkers, involving major pharma and biotech firms such as Eli Lilly, Biogen, and smaller biotech startups specializing in neurodiagnostic assays.

  • Overlap with Global Patents: Many similar patents, notably in the U.S. and Europe, target biomarker detection for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, with some filed by academic institutions. This complicates freedom-to-operate considerations.
  • Canadian Patent Environment: Canada’s patent office has maintained a relatively open approach to diagnostics, but recent patent law amendments have increased scrutiny over software and method patents, emphasizing inventive step and industrial applicability.

2. Infringement and Enforcement

  • The patent’s enforceability depends on clear differentiation from prior art and the validity of core claims.
  • Given the rapid evolution of biomarker discovery, claims may face validity challenges if prior art predates the filing date or if the claims are deemed too broad.

3. Strategic Positioning

  • The claims’ scope suggests a strategic intent to protect both the diagnostic method and integrated system, creating a comprehensive patent shield.
  • For companies developing neurodiagnostics, CA2377605 offers a potential blocking patent but must be integrated with other patents for broader coverage.

Implications for Industry and Innovation

1. Market Opportunities

  • The patent substantiates exclusivity in certain biomarker-based diagnostic methods, enabling patent holders to monetize via licensing or direct commercialization.
  • Diagnostic companies may develop test kits or software platforms within the patent’s scope, provided they avoid infringement.

2. Challenges and Opportunities

  • Evolving legal standards around patentability, especially on synthetic methods and software, necessitate vigilant patent strategy.
  • Innovation in novel biomarkers or alternative analytical methods could circumvent existing claims, emphasizing ongoing research.

Key Takeaways

  • Breadth and Focus: CA2377605 encompasses a focused yet strategically broad set of claims covering molecular diagnostic methods and systems for neurodegenerative disorders.
  • Valuable Patent Asset: Its detailed claim scope and coverage of both detection and data interpretation position it as a valuable asset in the neurodiagnostic space.
  • Potential Overlaps: Navigates a crowded patent landscape; careful freedom-to-operate analysis is crucial.
  • Legal Considerations: Patent validity and enforceability depend on evolving jurisprudence, particularly regarding software and method claims.
  • Strategic Value: Offers a solid defensive and offensive position for entities developing related neurodiagnostic technologies.

Conclusion

Canadian patent CA2377605 underscores the significance of integrating molecular biomarkers and computational analysis in diagnosing neurological disorders. While its scope is comprehensive within its targeted domain, ongoing innovation and legal developments necessitate strategic patent management. Stakeholders should monitor related patents and emerging scientific discoveries to optimize their IP portfolios and market positioning.


FAQs

Q1: Does CA2377605 cover all biomarkers associated with neurodegenerative diseases?
No, the patent specifies certain biomarkers but also includes broader language. It primarily covers methods involving the detection of predefined biomarker panels associated with neurodegeneration.

Q2: Can other companies develop neurodiagnostic tests without infringing this patent?
Yes. By identifying novel biomarkers or employing different detection techniques not covered by the claims, companies can avoid infringement.

Q3: How does the patent landscape in Canada compare to the US and Europe for neurodiagnostic patents?
Canada’s patent system is somewhat more restrictive on software and method patents, requiring clear inventive steps. The US and Europe may offer broader patentability but face their own legal nuances.

Q4: Are system claims in CA2377605 enforceable if software components are involved?
Enforceability depends on whether the software claims satisfy inventive step and are not deemed patent-ineligible. Recent amendments require careful claim drafting.

Q5: What strategic considerations should companies have regarding this patent?
Companies should conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, explore alternative biomarkers, and consider licensing negotiations if their technology overlaps.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA2377605. [Official Patent Document].
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports on Neurodiagnostics.
  3. US Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Applications and Patent Family Data for Biomarker-based Diagnostics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.