You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: June 19, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI1011876


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI1011876

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,010,517 Apr 29, 2030 Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl
10,842,766 Apr 29, 2030 Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl
10,881,632 Apr 29, 2030 Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl
11,103,477 Apr 29, 2030 Amarin Pharms VASCEPA icosapent ethyl
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazilian Drug Patent BRPI1011876

Key Findings
The Brazilian patent system operates under Law No. 9279/96, where patent scope is defined by claims interpreted alongside specifications and drawings[5]. While the specific patent BRPI1011876 is not directly referenced in available data, this analysis synthesizes Brazil’s patent framework, typical claim structures for pharmaceuticals, and broader trends affecting drug patents. Secondary patents—covering formulations, polymorphs, or methods of use—are prevalent and often extend market exclusivity by 6–7 years beyond primary patents[12]. Recent regulatory changes, such as restrictions on claim amendments during appeals[14], and litigation trends favoring preliminary injunctions[15], shape the landscape. Brazil’s patent backlog and strategic "evergreening" practices further complicate market entry for generics[6][13].


Brazilian Patent Framework and Claim Interpretation

Legal Foundations of Patent Scope

Under Article 41 of Brazil’s IP Law, patent protection is determined by claims, interpreted with specifications and drawings[5]. Claims must be clear, precise, and supported by the description to avoid invalidation. For chemical inventions, polymorphs require physicochemical parameters (e.g., crystallographic data) for patentability[5]. Methods of treatment are excluded, but Swiss-type claims (e.g., “Use of X for manufacturing a medicament to treat Y”) remain permissible[5][18].

Types of Infringement

Brazil recognizes three infringement categories:

  1. Literal Infringement: Exact replication of claim elements.
  2. Equivalent Infringement: Minor alterations that do not change the invention’s core function[5].
  3. Contributory Infringement: Supplying components essential to the patented invention[5].

Recent court rulings emphasize that amendments made during prosecution to avoid prior art limit equivalence claims, requiring precise claim drafting[5].


Pharmaceutical Patent Claims in Brazil

Primary vs. Secondary Patents

Primary patents protect active ingredients (e.g., linagliptin in TRADJENTA)[1]. Secondary patents cover derivatives (polymorphs, salts), formulations, or methods of use. For example:

  • PI0711179 protects TRADJENTA’s composition with linagliptin[1].
  • PI0713425 covers vortioxetine hydrobromide’s crystalline form in TRINTELLIX[1].

Independent secondary patents (lacking primary compound claims) extend exclusivity. For instance, formulation patents add 6.5 years, while method-of-use patents add 7.4 years[12].

Strategic Patenting Trends

Pharmaceutical companies often file “patent thickets” to delay generics. A single drug may have 7+ secondary patents, creating a “web” that complicates generic design[13]. For example, BUNAVAIL (buprenorphine/naloxone) is protected by four patents, including PI0619806 for abuse-deterrent formulations[1]. Over 70% of blockbuster drugs have secondary patents, with 23% relying solely on them[12].


Regulatory and Prosecution Challenges

Examination Backlogs and Accelerated Pathways

Brazil’s patent office (INPI) faces a backlog of ~80,000 pending applications, delaying grants by 8–12 years[6]. Measures like the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) aim to expedite examination but remain underutilized due to strict eligibility criteria[6].

Recent Amendments to Appeal Procedures

As of April 2024, claim amendments during appeals are restricted to narrowing scope and must align with prior examiner objections[14]. Post-allowance divisional applications are prohibited, limiting strategies to broaden protection[16].


Litigation Landscape

Preliminary Injunctions and Enforcement

Brazilian courts grant preliminary injunctions in ~80% of patent cases, often within six months[15]. For example, SEP (standard-essential patent) holders secured injunctions in 93.7% of cases, forcing settlements in 66.6%[17]. State courts in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo handle 87.5% of cases, favoring patentees due to specialized IP chambers[15][17].

Invalidity Challenges

Invalidity suits are filed in federal courts, with INPI as a mandatory defendant. Only 0.6% of granted patents are invalidated post-grant, reflecting a high bar for challengers[17]. Courts rarely stay infringement cases pending invalidity rulings, creating bifurcation risks[17].


Market Implications and Generic Entry

Patent Expirations and Generic Launches

From 2025–2026, 33 drugs face patent expiry in Brazil, including:

  • Belinostat (PI0610128 expiring May 2025)[1].
  • Eslicarbazepine acetate (PI0615970 expiring July 2025)[1].
  • Linagliptin (PI0722388 expiring May 2026)[1].

Post-expiry, generics must navigate secondary patents. For instance, TRADJENTA’s ten patents require generics to avoid formulation and polymorph claims[1].

Pricing and Competition

Post-generic entry, drug prices drop 30–90%. However, litigation costs and secondary patents delay launches by 2–4 years[13]. ANVISA’s bioequivalence requirements further slow market access[6].


Conclusion

Brazil’s patent system prioritizes originator rights through broad claim interpretation, secondary patenting, and injunctive relief. While BRPI1011876’s specifics remain unclear, the landscape underscores strategic challenges for generics: navigating thickets, regulatory delays, and costly litigation. Recent reforms to limit claim amendments signal tighter prosecution but may exacerbate backlogs. For sustainable access, policymakers must balance innovation incentives with antitrust measures targeting abusive evergreening[13][18].

Key Takeaways

  • Secondary patents extend exclusivity by 6–7 years post-primary expiry.
  • 93.7% of SEP injunctions are granted, driving rapid settlements.
  • INPI’s backlog delays generic entry despite patent expirations.

FAQs

  1. How do Brazilian courts handle patent infringement?
    State courts grant preliminary injunctions in ~80% of cases, typically within six months[15].

  2. What are Brazil’s rules for secondary patents?
    They must define physicochemical properties (polymorphs) or specific formulations, avoiding methods of treatment[5][12].

  3. How long do drug patents last in Brazil?
    20 years from filing, but secondary patents often extend effective terms[1][12].

  4. What reforms affect patent appeals?
    Post-April 2024, claim amendments during appeals must narrow scope and address examiner objections[14].

  5. How common are invalidations?
    Only 0.6% of granted patents are invalidated, reflecting high validity thresholds[17].

"Secondary patents enable originators to maintain market exclusivity long after primary patents expire, often without therapeutic benefits."[13]

References

  1. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/p/expiring-drug-patents-generic-entry/Brazil
  2. https://curity.io/resources/learn/scopes-vs-claims/
  3. https://patents.google.com/patent/US10881632B2/en
  4. https://patents.google.com/patent/US8551521B2/en
  5. https://www.montaury.com.br/en/scope-of-patent-protection-brazil
  6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27804784/
  7. https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  8. https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search/search-application
  9. https://www.gov.br/inpi/en/services/patents/basic-guide/patent-search
  10. https://www.gov.br/inpi/en
  11. https://patentpc.com/blog/how-to-evaluate-patent-claims
  12. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0049470
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7592140/
  14. https://smabr.com/new-regulation-on-the-analysis-of-appeals-in-patent-applications-in-brazil/
  15. https://www.daniel-ip.com/en/blog/data/using-empirical-research-to-understand-brazilian-ip-practice/
  16. https://www.lickslegal.com/articles/patent-filings-and-divisionals-in-brazil-the-challenge-to-obtain-ip-protection
  17. https://ipwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Licks-Attorneys-Brazil-ICT-Patent-Assertions-in-Brazil.pdf
  18. https://www.lickslegal.com/articles/brazilian-patent-statute-under-attack-second-use-inventions-polymorphs-and-inventive-step-part-iii
Last updated: 2025-04-23

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.