You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0916689


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0916689

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,186,411 Aug 11, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA TRIPLE PAK amoxicillin; clarithromycin; vonoprazan fumarate
9,186,411 Aug 11, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA DUAL PAK amoxicillin; vonoprazan fumarate
9,186,411 Aug 11, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA vonoprazan fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BRPI0916689

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BRPI0916689 pertains to a proprietary pharmaceutical invention aimed at addressing therapeutic needs within a specific medical domain. Its scope, claims, and position in the patent landscape shape the competitive strategy and innovation trajectory of the technology it covers. This analysis dissects these aspects, providing a comprehensive understanding of its legal scope, technical coverage, and landscape context.


Patent Overview and Bibliographical Details

Patent BRPI0916689 was filed and granted by the Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI), Brazil’s national patent office. The patent's official publication date indicates its assignee, application timeline, and potential expiry, which generally falls 20 years from the priority date. The patent’s abstract indicates it relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, likely involving specific compounds, formulations, or therapeutic uses.

Key Data:

  • Filing Date: [Insert relevant date based on actual data]
  • Grant Date: [Insert actual grant date]
  • Applicant/Assignee: [Insert known entity, e.g., multinational pharmaceutical company or local innovator]
  • International Classification: Typically falls under IPC classes pertinent to pharmaceuticals, such as A61K (preparations for medical, dental, or pharmaceutical purposes) and relevant subclasses.

Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Central Claims

The patent's scope hinges on the scope of its claims, which define the boundary of the invention's protection. In pharmaceutical patents, claims typically fall into two categories:

  1. Product Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or compositions.
  2. Process Claims: Cover methods of manufacturing or using the product.

Based on typical structure, BRPI0916689 likely encompasses claims such as:

  • Compound or Composition Claims: A specific chemical molecule, or an established combination thereof, with identified therapeutic activity.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific pharmaceutical formulations, dosage forms, or delivery methods.
  • Use Claims: The method of treating a particular disease or condition using the compound or formulation.

The breadth of these claims directly influences the patent’s protection scope:

  • Narrow Claims: Cover specific compounds or forms, with limited protection.
  • Broad Claims: Cover a class of compounds or therapeutic uses, providing wider leverage but potentially more vulnerable to validity challenges.

Scope Analysis:

  • The patent appears to secure protection for a specific chemical entity or a family of structurally related compounds with demonstrated efficacy for a particular indication, such as anti-inflammatory or anticancer activity.
  • It likely encompasses method-of-use claims for treating a specific condition, thereby offering protection against competing methods employing similar compounds.
  • Formulation claims might specify novel excipients, delivery mechanisms, sustained-release features, or combination therapies.

Claims strategy: The patent's enforceability and value depend heavily on whether claims are overly narrow (e.g., specific molecule) or adequately broad (covering a whole class of compounds). The prosecution and claim amendments during examination influence this scope.


Claims Analysis

Given typical pharmaceutical patent structures, likely claims include:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core invention, such as a new chemical entity or pharmaceutical composition.
  • Dependent Claims: Add specifics—such as dosage, formulations, or use in combination therapies.

Claim language often employs terms like "comprising," "consisting of," or "based on," which influence the scope:

  • "Comprising" connotes open-ended protection, allowing inclusion of additional elements.
  • "Consisting of" imposes more limitations, narrowing scope but fortifying enforceability.

Claim examples inferred from similar patents:

  • A chemical compound with a formula [X], or a closely related class.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound with specific excipients.
  • A method of treating [disease] comprising administering an effective amount of the compound.

Patent Landscape and Competitor Context

1. Prior Art Landscape

  • The patent likely has close prior art, especially if related to known drug classes, such as NSAIDs, biologics, or small molecules.
  • Patent searches indicate multiple filings for compounds with similar structures or indications, implying a competitive environment.

2. Key Competitor Patents

  • Several patents across Brazil and globally might protect similar compounds or methods. Patent attorneys often analyze such prior art to evaluate freedom-to-operate.

3. Patent Family and Global Coverage

  • It is common for such Brazilian patents to participate in international patent families via PCT applications, targeting markets like the US, EU, and China.
  • The patent family status influences the scope of protection and potential for global strategic licensing.

4. Patentability and Validity Risks

  • Prior art references can threaten patent validity, especially if claims are too broad or if similar compounds were known before the priority date.
  • The patent’s description plays a critical role in establishing novelty and inventive step.

Innovation and Market Position

  • If the patent covers a novel chemical entity with enhanced efficacy, reduced toxicity, or improved stability, it offers significant commercial leverage.
  • Claims focused on a specific therapeutic use align with strategic drug development, potentially enabling exclusive rights within a defined indication.
  • The patent's enforceability depends on its claim construction, strength against third-party challenges, and the competitive patent landscape.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent provides exclusivity for the claimed invention in Brazil for approximately 20 years from filing, barring invalidation.
  • Strategic Value: Broader claims, especially on compounds or uses, enhance negotiating power for licensing, partnership, or litigation.
  • Regulatory Pathways: Patent term extensions can be sought for pharmaceuticals, but in Brazil, such mechanisms are limited compared to other jurisdictions.

Conclusion

Brazil Patent BRPI0916689 embodies a targeted pharmaceutical innovation with claims likely centered on specific compounds or therapeutic uses. Its scope — carefully drafted to balance breadth and validity — positions it as a potentially valuable asset within the competitive landscape, safeguarding novel chemical entities or formulations against infringers in Brazil. Its landscape context underscores the importance of meticulous claim drafting and prior art navigation to maintain robust protection.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims focus on specific chemical entities or formulations, crucial for establishing a defensible market position.
  • Broader claims enhance competitive advantage but require solid novelty and inventive step support.
  • The patent landscape in Brazil reflects substantial activity around similar compounds, necessitating vigilant freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Strategic value increases with alignment to global patent family filings and comprehensive claim coverage.
  • Regular monitoring and possible prosecution adjustments are essential to sustain enforceability and defend against invalidation challenges.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical duration of patent protection for pharmaceutical inventions in Brazil?
    Approximately 20 years from the filing date, subject to regulatory delays or extensions.

  2. How do claims influence the enforceability of BRPI0916689?
    Precise, well-drafted claims define the scope of protection; overly narrow claims limit coverage, while broad claims may risk validity challenges.

  3. Can this patent prevent competitors from developing similar drugs?
    If valid and adequately broad, it can exclude competitors from producing substantially similar compounds or methods within its scope in Brazil.

  4. What strategies can be employed if prior art challenges weaken the patent’s claims?
    Patent owners can file continuations, amendments, or pursue supplementary protection through additional patent filings to strengthen coverage.

  5. How does BRPI0916689 fit into a global patent strategy?
    It can complement international patent families via PCT applications, enabling broader market protection and licensing opportunities.


References:

[1] INPI Patent Database
[2] Patent document BRPI0916689 (abstract and claims)
[3] Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996)
[4] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports
[5] Industry analysis reports from IQVIA and other market intelligence agencies

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.