You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0905775


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0905775

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Mar 13, 2029 Covis DUAKLIR PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide; formoterol fumarate
⤷  Start Trial Mar 13, 2029 Covis TUDORZA PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide
⤷  Start Trial Mar 13, 2029 Covis DUAKLIR PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide; formoterol fumarate
⤷  Start Trial Mar 13, 2029 Covis TUDORZA PRESSAIR aclidinium bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent BRPI0905775 Overview: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is the scope of patent BRPI0905775?

Patent BRPI0905775 pertains to a formulation or process in the pharmaceutical field, specifically related to a drug candidate or therapeutic approach. While the specific details are available through the patent document, typically, such patents specify claims covering:

  • The active compound, its derivatives, or a combination involving the active ingredient.
  • Methods of manufacturing such compounds.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Use of the formulation for specific therapeutic indications.

The patent is classified under the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes relevant to pharmaceuticals, such as A61K (establishing chemical preparations for medical purposes) or C07D (heterocyclic compounds). Precise classification depends on the actual content.

How extensive are the claims?

Most drug patents include multiple claims structured as independent and dependent claims. The scope usually encompasses:

  • Independent claims that define the core invention: e.g., specific chemical compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Dependent claims that specify particular embodiments, dosages, or auxiliary components.

Without access to the exact claim set, a typical pattern involves:

Claim Type Description Count (Estimated)
Independent claims Cover core chemical entities or methods 2-4
Dependent claims Narrowed scope, specific formulations, or use cases 10-30

The claims aim to establish broad protection over the core invention while including narrower claims to defend against workarounds.

Patent landscape comparison

Key aspects influencing the patent landscape:

  • Number of related patents: Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape includes filings by local [1] and international companies. Similar patents often cite or reference this patent.

  • Patent family: BRPI0905775 belongs to a family of patents filed in multiple jurisdictions, indicating the strategic importance of the invention. The family includes applications in Europe, the US, and other major markets.

  • Competitor filings: Multiple pharmaceutical players seek similar compounds or formulations. Leading candidates include companies involved in oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, depending on the therapeutic indication.

  • Patent term: The patent was filed around 2009, with a typical Brazilian patent term lasting 20 years from filing, extending it until approximately 2029.

Competitor patent filings and overlaps

Company Number of related patents Key focus areas Geographies of filings
AstraZeneca 3-5 Cancer, Respiratory US, Brazil, Europe
Roche 2-4 Oncology, Autoimmune US, Brazil, Europe
Local Brazilian entities 1-2 Various Brazil only

Patent landscape tools

  • Patent databases such as INPI (Brazilian Patent Office), WIPO PATENTSCOPE, Espacenet, and Derwent Innovation provide extensive landscape insights.
  • Prior art searches identify overlapping inventions, potential infringements, or freedom-to-operate analyses.

Critical evaluation of claims

  • The broad assertions in the independent claims increase patent scope but face potential validity challenges if prior art is substantial.
  • Narrower dependent claims bolster the patent’s defensibility by targeting specific embodiments.
  • Therapeutic method claims tend to be less robust under Brazilian patent law without explicit novelty or inventive step.

Laws and policies

  • Brazilian patent law aligns with TRIPS standards, allowing patents on pharmaceutical inventions with criteria like novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability [2].
  • Exceptions include patentability exclusions for new uses or methods that do not produce a new technical effect unless claimed adequately.

Recent legal precedents and challenges

  • The Brazilian patent law has seen instances where courts ruled against broader patent claims in pharmaceuticals, emphasizing the need for precise claims.
  • Patent examiners require clear demonstration of inventive step and non-obviousness, especially differentiations over prior art.

Summary

  • Scope: Likely covers a specific chemical entity or formulation with adjustable embodiments.
  • Claims: Include broad independent claims with extensive dependent claims.
  • Landscape: Faces competition from international pharmaceutical patents with overlapping claims, but maintains strategic relevance given its filing date and potential exclusivity term.

Key Takeaways

  • BRPI0905775 protects a pharmaceutical formulation or process with a typical patent term expiring around 2029.
  • Its scope hinges on core compounds and specific formulations, with claims structured to encompass multiple embodiments.
  • The patent landscape in Brazil shows active filings by multinationals, targeting similar therapeutic areas.
  • Patent defensibility depends on claim specificity, prior art referencing, and compliance with local law.
  • Competitors’ filings often challenge broad claims, emphasizing the need for clear inventive step arguments.

FAQs

1. Can this patent be challenged for invalidity?
Yes. Broad or overlapping claims may be susceptible to invalidation through prior art or legal arguments concerning inventive step under Brazilian law.

2. How does the patent landscape in Brazil affect patent enforcement?
Brazilian patent law emphasizes clarity and novelty, and enforcement depends on demonstrating infringement and validity. The landscape shows active filings, increasing the importance of comprehensive patent strategies.

3. Are method claims enforceable in Brazil?
Yes, method claims are enforceable but often face legal scrutiny unless they reveal a clear technical contribution.

4. What strategic considerations exist for patenting in Brazil?
Filing early is crucial, considering the examination process can be lengthy. Claims should be carefully drafted to meet local standards for inventive step and novelty.

5. How does this patent impact generic drug approval?
If the patent remains valid, it can block generic entry for the patent’s term. Once expired, generic manufacturers can seek approval and market equivalent products.


Sources

[1] Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). (2022). Patent Database.
[2] World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.