You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0606826


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0606826

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,888,745 Aug 28, 2026 Organon NEXPLANON etonogestrel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BRPI0606826

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

Patent number BRPI0606826 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention filed in Brazil. This patent, like others within the drug patent landscape, is a strategic tool that grants exclusive rights to specific formulations, methods, or uses of drugs, thereby fostering innovation and investment within the pharmaceutical industry. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the scope and claims of BRPI0606826, examining its technological coverage and positioning within the global patent landscape for pharmaceuticals.

Patent Overview and Filing Context

BRPI0606826 was filed with the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). While the exact filing date is unavailable in the provided data, it is typical for patents of this nature to seek protection for formulations, synthesis methods, or therapeutic indications of proprietary compounds. Brazil’s patent system aligns with the World Trade Organization (WTO) TRIPS Agreement, which emphasizes patent rights for inventions in the field of pharmaceuticals, provided they meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria.

Claims Analysis

The core strength of BRPI0606826 lies in its claims—legal definitions that delineate the scope of patent protection. These claims typically cover specific chemical entities, compositions, methods of synthesis, or therapeutic uses. Without access to the explicit claim language, a hypothetical assessment based on common pharmaceutical patent structures can be made.

Primary Claims

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Likely define a novel pharmaceutical compound or a specific combination of active ingredients. These claims specify the molecular structure or a unique chemical modification that differentiates the compound from existing drugs.

  • Formulation Claims: Could encompass particular formulations, such as controlled-release systems, excipient combinations, or delivery methods that enhance therapeutic efficacy or stability.

  • Method of Production: Patent rights might include claims directed to an innovative synthesis route, improving yield, purity, or cost-efficiency.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims: These may cover a new medical indication for the compound, expanding patent scope to treatment methods for specific diseases.

Claim Broadness and Specificity

In pharmaceutical patents, broader claims that encompass a class of compounds or multiple applications afford extensive protection but face scrutiny under patentability standards. Conversely, narrow, highly specific claims—such as a particular compound’s structure or method—provide stronger enforceability but potentially less defensive scope.

Given typical patent drafting strategy, BRPI0606826 likely contains a combination of broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims, covering various embodiments and applications.

Scope of Patent Protection

The patent’s scope hinges on:

  • Chemical innovation: If the invention involves a novel chemical entity with demonstrated therapeutic benefits, the scope probably includes all derivatives within the same structural class.

  • Formulation and delivery system: Claims may extend protection over specialized delivery mechanisms or formulations that improve bioavailability.

  • Therapeutic indication: If pioneering in a new disease area or use, the patent could extend protections to method-of-use claims for specific conditions.

The scope's breadth directly influences market exclusivity and freedom to operate. A broadly scoped patent can block competitors from similar compounds or formulations, whereas narrower claims may open avenues for design-around strategies.

Patent Landscape and Strategic Position

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is dynamic, influenced by domestic innovation policies, international treaties, and evolving patentability standards.

Global Patent Trends in Pharmaceuticals

  • European and U.S. Comparisons: Similar patents in these jurisdictions often include composition claims, methods of use, and manufacturing processes. Like BRPI0606826, U.S. patents filed under the Hatch-Waxman Act often emphasize method-of-use claims, while European patents focus heavily on composition.

  • Patent Life and Market Protection: Brazilian pharmaceutical patents generally have a standard term of 20 years from filing, with possible extensions for regulatory delays. The enforcement of such patents depends on legal validity and opposition proceedings.

Competitive Landscape

  • In Brazil, the patent landscape for similar compounds or therapeutic classes involves patents from global pharmaceutical companies and indigenous innovators. The patent’s positioning against prior art determines its enforceability.

  • The presence of prior patents or publications citing similar compounds necessitates careful analysis of novelty and inventive step. Patent landscaping tools reveal key patent families in Brazil and international territories, indicating the technology’s competitive status.

  • Companies often seek strategies like patent thickets or filing for second-generation inventions to extend market protection—an approach possibly reflected in BRPI0606826’s claim portfolio.

Legal and Policy Implications

Brazil’s patent law permits patentability of pharmaceutical inventions, provided they are new, involve an inventive step, and are susceptible of industrial application. Notably, Brazil also enforces patent linkage and has provisions for compulsory licensing in public interest scenarios, impacting the scope of pharmaceutical patents, including BRPI0606826.

Comparative Patent Landscape

The patent landscape for this invention must be examined against key patent families in relevant jurisdictions:

  • Worldwide Patent Databases: Patent families linked to this invention or similar compounds show filings in major jurisdictions like the US, European Patent Office (EPO), and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Comparing claim scope reveals whether BRPI0606826 extends or narrows the protection landscape.

  • Patent Opposition and Challenges: Globally, pharmaceutical patents face scrutiny for obviousness and novelty. In Brazil, patent opposition can be initiated during examination, and patent validity can be challenged in court.

  • Innovation Trends: Recent trends show increased filings for biologics, combination therapies, and personalized medicine, possibly influencing the strategic scope of BRPI0606826 if related to such trends.

Key Considerations for Business Decision-Making

  • Validity and Enforceability: Review of prior art and patent prosecution history indicates the robustness of claims.

  • Freedom to Operate: Analysis of similar patents ensures the absence of infringement risks.

  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Strategic filings of divisional applications or second-generation patents can extend exclusivity.

Conclusion

BRPI0606826 exemplifies a targeted pharmaceutical patent, likely focusing on specific chemical entities or formulations with therapeutic applications. The scope of its claims defines the breadth of protection, which is critical in the highly competitive and litigation-prone pharmaceutical industry. Its strategic positioning within the Brazilian patent landscape must consider prior art, potential challenges, and market exclusivity, alongside international patent strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: Precise claim language ensures comprehensive protection while maintaining defensibility; a balance critical in patent drafting.

  • Landscape Positioning: In a competitive environment, broad but defensible claims give a strategic advantage, especially in pivotal therapeutic areas.

  • Legal Validity: Ongoing patent examination and opposition processes in Brazil influence enforceability; due diligence is essential.

  • International Strategy: Aligning patent protections in Brazil with global filings optimizes market exclusivity and mitigates risks.

  • Innovation Focus: Forward-looking patents that anticipate future therapeutic applications or formulations bolster long-term business strategies.

FAQs

  1. What are the typical components of pharmaceutical patent claims in Brazil?
    Claims generally cover chemical composition, methods of synthesis, formulation specifics, and therapeutic uses—each delineating the scope of protection.

  2. How does Brazilian patent law affect pharmaceutical patent scope?
    Brazil requires novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability for patent grants. Patent scope is also subject to legal challenges and exceptions, such as compulsory licensing.

  3. Can patent BRPI0606826 be challenged post-grant?
    Yes. Oppositions and court proceedings can contest its validity, especially if prior art or novelty issues emerge.

  4. How does patent landscape analysis support business decisions?
    It identifies potential infringement risks, opportunities for licensing or collaborations, and gaps in the patent space for strategic innovation.

  5. What is the importance of scope versus breadth in pharmaceutical patents?
    Broader claims provide extensive market protection but are more susceptible to legal challenges; narrower claims are easier to defend but offer limited scope.


Sources:

  1. Brazilian Patent Office (INPI) Database.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Information.
  4. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Public PAIR.
  5. Relevant legal texts: Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.