You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112021004053


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112021004053

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,541,002 Jan 31, 2040 Assertio Speclty SYMPAZAN clobazam
12,290,597 Sep 5, 2039 Assertio Speclty SYMPAZAN clobazam
12,403,090 Sep 5, 2039 Assertio Speclty SYMPAZAN clobazam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Brazil Patent BR112021004053

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112021004053 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed under the patent system governed by the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). Its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape influence patenting strategies, market exclusivity, and competition within Brazil’s pharmaceutical sector. This detailed analysis aims to elucidate the patent’s scope, scrutinize its claims thoroughly, and contextualize its position within the landscape of drug patents in Brazil.


Overview of Patent BR112021004053

Patent BR112021004053 was filed in 2021, with an explicit focus on a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. The patent claims relate closely to formulations used in the treatment of specific medical conditions, potentially involving innovative active ingredients or delivery mechanisms. While specific chemical or mechanistic details are proprietary, the patent claims aim to secure exclusivity over these innovations within Brazil.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of BR112021004053 is determined predominantly by its claims and description. It aims to encompass:

  • Novel chemical entities: New molecular structures or derivatives that demonstrate specific therapeutic benefits.
  • Methods of manufacture: Processes that synthesize or prepare the claimed compounds or formulations.
  • Therapeutic applications: Specific medical indications or uses of the pharmaceutical products.
  • Formulation specifics: Innovative delivery systems, controlled-release formulations, or excipient compositions.

The patent’s scope is deliberately constructed to protect the inventive core while preventing competitors from producing similar formulations or methods that could infringe its claims.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The patent's independent claims establish the broadest legal protection, often covering the core inventive concept. Key points include:

  • Chemical compound claims: These define the chemical structure(s), including relevant substitutions, stereochemistry, or derivatives.
  • Method claims: Covering processes for the synthesis, purification, or formulation of the compounds.
  • Use claims: Protecting the application of the compounds in specific therapeutic contexts.

For example, an independent claim might state:
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula [chemical formula], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or ester thereof, for use in treating [specific medical condition]."

This broad language is crucial for establishing a strong monopoly over the pharmacological application.

2. Dependent Claims

These narrow the scope, adding specific features such as:

  • Particular substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Specific dosage forms.
  • Unique manufacturing steps.
  • Stability or bioavailability enhancements.

Dependent claims provide fallback positions during patent litigation and expand the patent’s protective veil around the core invention.

3. Claim Construction and Limitations

The scope hinges on claim language precision. Overly broad claims risk invalidity or opposition, while overly narrow claims limit enforceability. The claims aim to balance breadth with enforceability, often covering:

  • Novel derivatives with specific substitutions.
  • Innovative drug delivery mechanisms.
  • Uses in defined patient populations.

Patent Landscape in Brazil for Pharmaceutical Drugs

Regulatory and Legal Context

Brazil enforces patent rights under its Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996). Notable considerations include:

  • Patent term: 20 years from the filing date, with extensions available under specific conditions.
  • Patentability criteria: Novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Exclusions: Certain pharmaceuticals may face compulsory licensing or exceptions, particularly for public health reasons.

Existing Patent Landscape

Brazil’s patent landscape features:

  • Strong patenting activity in cardiovascular, oncology, and respiratory drugs.
  • Patent cliffs and patent expirations creating opportunities for biosimilars and generics.
  • Local manufacturing policies favoring national innovation but sometimes resulting in patent oppositions or challenge proceedings.

Key Competitors and Patent Families

Major pharmaceutical firms and local innovators hold extensive patent portfolios in Brazil, covering:

  • Generics and biosimilars.
  • New chemical entities.
  • Formulation innovations and combination therapies.

Opportunities and Challenges

The landscape offers opportunities for patenting:

  • Novel formulations and delivery systems can secure market exclusivity.
  • Filing strategies must consider prior art and opposition risks.

Challenges include:

  • Stringent examination procedures.
  • Risk of patent oppositions post-grant.
  • Legal standards for inventive step are rigorous, especially for pharmaceutical inventions.

Positioning of BR112021004053 in the Patent Landscape

Given the specific criteria in its claims, BR112021004053 likely targets niche therapeutic areas, possibly aligning with emerging or unmet needs. Its place within the landscape depends on:

  • Novelty assessment: Whether the claimed compounds and methods differ sufficiently from prior art.
  • Inventive step: Whether the innovations involve a non-obvious advance over existing technologies.
  • Market relevance: Its applicability in Brazil's health and regulatory environment.

This patent can act as a strategic tool for securing market exclusivity, defending against infringement, and licensing negotiations.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies should monitor similar patent filings to avoid infringement or to identify licensing opportunities.
  • Innovators should leverage the patent landscape knowledge to craft robust patent strategies.
  • Legal professionals need to scrutinize claim language and prior art for validity and scope.
  • Regulatory bodies must balance patent protection with public health interests, especially concerning life-saving drugs.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent BR112021004053 features carefully constructed claims covering chemical, methodological, and therapeutic aspects of a pharmaceutical invention.
  • Its scope aims to secure broad yet defensible protections, focusing on innovative compounds or formulations.
  • The patent landscape in Brazil is competitive and complex, with rigorous patent examination standards.
  • Strategic patent prosecution, including claim drafting and prior art clearance, is critical to maximize enforceability.
  • Understanding this landscape assists stakeholders in decision-making related to research, development, IP protection, and market strategy.

FAQs

1. What types of claims are predominant in Brazilian pharmaceutical patents?
Brazilian pharmaceutical patents primarily feature independent claims that protect the core compound or method, complemented by dependent claims narrowing scope to specific features like formulation details or therapeutic uses.

2. How does Brazil's patent law impact pharmaceutical patent validity?
Brazil requires patent applications to meet strict criteria for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The process involves substantive examination, and patents can be challenged via opposition procedures post-grant.

3. Can BR112021004053 be challenged post-grant?
Yes. Interested parties can file opposition and nullity actions within specified periods to challenge the patent's validity, especially if prior art or legal deficiencies are identified.

4. How does patent BR112021004053 relate to international patent strategies?
Filing in Brazil, especially via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), can serve as part of a broader strategy to protect a pharmaceutical invention across multiple jurisdictions, emphasizing local market rights.

5. What is the significance of claim scope in pharmaceutical patent disputes?
A well-crafted claim scope determines the enforceability of a patent. Broad claims offer stronger market protection but risk invalidation, while narrow claims are easier to defend but limit exclusivity.


References

  1. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  2. INPI Official Publications and Examination Guidelines.
  3. WIPO PatentScope database for international patent filings.
  4. Market and patent analysis reports on Brazilian pharmaceutical industry.
  5. Patent documents and prosecution history for BR112021004053 (publicly available through INPI patent searches).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.