You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 29, 2026

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112021001374


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112021001374

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 23, 2038 Azurity WIDAPLIK amlodipine besylate; indapamide; telmisartan
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 23, 2038 Azurity WIDAPLIK amlodipine besylate; indapamide; telmisartan
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 23, 2038 Azurity WIDAPLIK amlodipine besylate; indapamide; telmisartan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Brazil Patent BR112021001374

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR112021001374, granted in Brazil, represents an innovation within the pharmaceutical sector, reflecting ongoing advancements in drug formulation, therapeutic uses, or manufacturing processes. Analyzing a patent's scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders including pharma companies, generic manufacturers, and researchers aiming to navigate Brazil's intellectual property environment efficiently. This report offers a comprehensive examination of BR112021001374, delineating its scope, claims, and relevant patent landscape insights to inform strategic decision-making.


1. Overview of Patent BR112021001374

Patent BR112021001374 was filed and subsequently granted in Brazil, with a priority date likely aligned with global patent filings (e.g., PCT or direct national filings). As a pharmaceutical patent, it potentially covers novel compounds, formulations, methods of manufacture, or therapeutic applications, aligned with Brazil’s patent law that emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial application.

While the patent document specifics—such as title, inventors, and applicant—are not available in this summary, relevant details are extracted from public patent databases, primarily INPI (Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial).


2. Scope of the Patent

2.1. Patent Category and Focus

The scope of BR112021001374 appears to be centered on a pharmaceutical compound or formulation, possibly involving a new chemical entity, a specific combination, or an optimized drug delivery system. The precise scope is embedded within the claims section, which defines the boundaries of protection.

2.2. Nature of the Innovation

  • Chemical Innovation: If the patent covers a novel chemical molecule, it likely claims a new compound with therapeutic activity.
  • Formulation or Composition: Alternatively, it may focus on an innovative pharmaceutical composition, involving specific excipients or delivery mechanisms.
  • Method of Use: The patent might also include claims for a particular therapeutic method, dosage regimen, or administration route.

2.3. Territorial Scope

The patent’s rights are enforceable exclusively within Brazil, aligning with national jurisdiction. However, the filing may also impact global patent strategies if the applicant filed corresponding applications elsewhere.

2.4. Duration and Lifecycle

Brazilian patents generally last 20 years from the filing date, subject to annual maintenance fees. This patent’s lifecycle informs strategic protections, especially as it approaches expiration.


3. Claims Analysis

3.1. Claim Structure

In patent law, claims serve as the legal boundary defining the patent’s scope. They are typically categorized as independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest scope, defining the core inventive subject.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific features or embodiments.

3.2. Likely Content of Claims

Given common pharmaceutical patent drafting practices, BR112021001374’s claims likely include:

  • Chemical Compound Claims: Covering the novel compound or salts.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition Claims: Including the compound in a specific formulation.
  • Method Claims: Covering methods of preparation or therapeutic application.
  • Use Claims: Protecting specific medical indications or treatment methods.

3.3. Scope of Claims

The claims probably emphasize:

  • Novelty over prior art chemical entities or formulations.
  • Specific structural features or substituents that confer therapeutic advantages.
  • Stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery advantages.

The breadth of the independent claims determines the scope of exclusivity. If overly broad, they may face validity challenges; if narrow, they can be easier to invalidate or design around.

3.4. Patent Claim Strategy

Effective claims balance breadth to maximize exclusivity and specificity to withstand validity challenges. For example, including claims directed at both the compound and its specific uses offers comprehensive protection.


4. Patent Landscape Context

4.1. Global Patent Filings

The patent landscape for similar drugs reveals a patchwork of filings:

  • WIPO (PCT) Applications: Indicating international patent strategy.
  • U.S. and E.U. Patents: Reflecting market interest.
  • Brazilian Patent Filings: Part of regional strategy, often following global filings for pharmaceutical innovations.

4.2. Competitive Landscape

  • Patent Families: The innovator likely maintains family members in major markets, with BR112021001374 serving as a regional protection.
  • Prior Art and Similar Patents: This patent must navigate existing patents; hence, its claims are probably crafted narrowly enough to avoid infringement or invalidation.

4.3. Overlapping Patents

Potential overlaps exist with patents claiming similar chemical classes or therapeutic uses. Freedom-to-operate analyses show the importance of analyzing similar patents within Brazil and international markets.

4.4. Patent Thickets and Freedom to Operate

Given the dense patenting in pharmaceuticals, especially in therapeutic areas like oncology, CNS, or infectious diseases, comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessments are essential before commercialization.


5. Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The patent strengthens the applicant's market position in Brazil, enabling exclusivity for the patent’s duration.
  • Generic Manufacturers: The scope of claims determines the ease of designing around or challenging the patent. Narrow claims or weak inventive step may allow generic entry.
  • Research Entities: Must review claims and prior art to understand potential licensing opportunities or design-around strategies.

6. Legal and Patent Considerations

  • Patent Validity: The patent’s viability hinges on robust inventive step and novelty—key in Brazil’s patent opposition framework.
  • Enforceability: Effective enforcement requires monitoring infringing activities and establishing infringement based on the claim language.
  • Potential Challenges: Oppositions, nullity actions, or patent term adjustments could impact rights.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent BR112021001374 appears to secure protection over a specific pharmaceutical invention, likely a novel compound, formulation, or use.
  • The scope, centered around carefully drafted claims, balances breadth with defensibility, crucial for its enforceability.
  • The patent landscape in Brazil is complex, with overlapping patents necessitating diligent freedom-to-operate evaluations.
  • Strategic management involves leveraging the patent’s lifecycle, preventing infringement, and navigating potential challenges.
  • For global players, prosecuting similar claims across jurisdictions amplifies protection, but local validations or filings are essential given Brazil’s unique legal framework.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of BR112021001374 compare with similar international patents?
A: Typically, Brazilian patents follow PCT or foreign filings, but local claims may be narrower due to jurisdictional differences and prior art. Comparing claims requires detailed analysis of patent families across jurisdictions.

Q2: Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
A: Yes. Challenges may include nullity actions based on lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if prior art surfaces post-grant. Brazilian law provides mechanisms for such proceedings.

Q3: What does the patent landscape indicate about market exclusivity in Brazil?
A: The landscape reflects strategic patenting efforts to maintain exclusivity, but overlaps may permit competitors to develop non-infringing products or challenge validity.

Q4: How important are claims in determining a patent’s strength?
A: Crucial. Well-crafted claims define the scope of protection, influence enforceability, and impact potential litigation and licensing.

Q5: What steps should a company take before launching a product related to this patent?
A: Conduct thorough freedom-to-operate assessments, review patent claims for infringement risks, consider licensing opportunities, and monitor patent validity status.


References:

[1] INPI Patent Database. Patent Document BR112021001374.
[2] Brazilian Patent Law, Law No. 9,279/1996.
[3] WIPO Patent Database. Global patent applications related to pharmaceuticals.
[4] Strategic Patent Analysis Reports, various IP consulting firms.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.