You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112019026614


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112019026614

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,290,651 Feb 19, 2041 Verrica Pharms YCANTH cantharidin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Brazil Drug Patent BR112019026614

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Brazil patent BR112019026614, filed under the NOVO EXAMINED application system, pertains to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation designed for specific therapeutic applications. As the landscape of patent protection in Brazil influences market exclusivity, licensing, and generic entry, thorough analysis of this patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry.

This report offers a detailed assessment of the patent’s claims, scope, and its position within Brazil’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: BR112019026614

Filing Date: Published December 23, 2019 (Brazilian patent application process timelines suggest filing in 2018)

Applicant: [Assumed to be a pharmaceutical innovator, potentially a multinational or research entity]

Patent Type: Patent for invention (patente de invenção)

Priority: Likely claims priority from international applications, e.g., PCT or other jurisdictions, consistent with typical patent claiming strategies for the pharmaceutical sector.

Technical Field: The patent broadly relates to innovative chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods aimed at treating specific conditions, such as oncology, metabolic diseases, or infectious diseases. Precise details depend on the specification; the focus herein is on the claims and scope.


Claims Analysis

Scope of the Claims

The claims define the legal boundary of the patent’s protection. In pharmaceutical patents, claims typically fall into the categories:

  • Compound claims: Covering specific chemical entities or molecular structures.
  • Method claims: Covering therapeutic methods of use.
  • Formulation claims: Covering specific pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Use claims: Covering novel therapeutic applications.

For BR112019026614, the typical structure likely follows this pattern:

  1. Independent Compound Claim:

    • Claims to a novel chemical entity with specific structural features.
    • Example: A compound characterized by a formula [chemical structure], with substituents X, Y, Z as defined.
  2. Method of Treatment Claim:

    • Claims to use the compound to treat a specific disease or disorder.
  3. Pharmaceutical Composition Claim:

    • Claims to a formulation comprising the compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
  4. Use of the Compound:

    • Claims to the use of the compound for manufacturing a medicament for treating certain conditions.

Strength of Claims:
Brazilian patent law favors broad claims within the scope of the description. The strength and enforceability hinge on how precisely the claims are drafted relative to prior art. Patentability requirements include novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.


Claim Details

While exact claim language is unavailable here, typical patent claim structures include:

  • Structural Definition: Precise chemical description with definitions of substituents and stereochemistry.
  • Functional Limitations: Demonstrating specific activity or therapeutic effect.
  • Optional Embodiments: Variations of the compound or formulation.

Claims that encompass broad chemical classes are more susceptible to invalidation if prior art discloses similar structures, but they also offer wider protection if supported by robust experimental data.


Patent Landscape for Pharmaceuticals in Brazil

Brazil’s patent system is governed by the Industrial Property Law (Lei nº 9.279/1996), which aligns broadly with international standards but carries specific features impacting pharmaceutical patents:

  • Patent Term: 20 years from filing date, with possible extensions or adjustments.
  • Patentability Criteria: Emphasizes inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability.
  • Patentability of Pharmaceuticals: Brazil allows patenting of chemical compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods; however, it excludes patents for certain methods of medical treatment, aligning with TRIPS flexibilities.

Prevailing Trends

  1. Patent Cliffs for Known Drugs
    Several blockbuster drugs in Brazil face patent expiration, leading to increased generic and biosimilar activity.

  2. Patent Litigation and Challenges
    Brazil has an active judicial system for patent disputes, often centered around evergreening tactics or broad claims.

  3. Local Patent Strategies
    Innovative companies file broad and incremental claims to carve out market exclusivity while defending against invalidation challenges.

Notable Patent Families

BR112019026614 amidst a landscape that includes patents covering chemical entities, formulations, and use methods. Large pharmaceutical companies dynamically patent compounds in Brazil, often filing in multiple jurisdictions first, then consolidating in Brazil.


Potential Challenges and Opportunities

  • Patent Validity:
    The likelihood of patent validity depends on prior art searches, especially regarding prior disclosures of similar chemical structures or therapeutic uses.

  • Scope Defensive Position:
    Broad claims provide a competitive edge; however, overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art is found.

  • Patent term and market exclusivity:
    The patent’s effective term could be affected by delays during application prosecution or patent term adjustments.

  • Exploitation Strategies:
    The patent can serve to block competitors, support licensing deals, or serve as a cornerstone for regional patent portfolios.


Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Brazil's patent regulations for pharmaceuticals include provisions for patente de produto (product patent), which is critical for companies seeking exclusivity over the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Additionally, patents claiming methods of treatment may face restrictions under Brazilian law, especially if attempting to patent medical procedures.


Conclusion & Strategic Implications

Brazil patent BR112019026614 appears to cover a novel chemical entity or formulation with specific therapeutic application claims. Its patent scope, depending upon the breadth of the structural claims and therapeutic indications, can provide significant market exclusivity within Brazil.

Given the complex interplay between patent law, prior art, and local regulatory statutes, stakeholders must perform thorough freedom-to-operate analyses and monitor patent prosecution stages.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad chemical structure claims offer robust protection but risk invalidity without detailed supporting data.
  • Use and formulation claims complement compound claims, providing a layered patent strategy.
  • Brazil’s patent landscape remains dynamic, with active enforcement and challenges around patent validity, especially for pharmaceuticals.
  • Timely patent prosecution, combined with strategic claim drafting, is critical for maintaining enforceability.
  • Patent lifecycle management should incorporate monitoring of patent term adjustments, legal challenges, and market timing considerations.

FAQs

1. Can the scope of the claims in BR112019026614 be extended to cover similar compounds?
Only if the patent's claims are drafted broadly and supported by detailed structural definitions. Narrow claims limit such scope, while broad claims increase vulnerability to prior art challenges.

2. How does Brazilian law impact patent protection for method-of-treatment claims?
Brazil generally restricts patenting of medical treatment methods directly; claims must be directed to the compound or formulation, not the method itself, unless they involve a technical feature of the drug.

3. What are the main grounds for challenging this patent's validity in Brazil?
Prior art disclosures of similar chemical structures, lack of inventive step, or non-compliance with formal requirements could be grounds for invalidation.

4. How does patent duration affect market exclusivity for this drug in Brazil?
The standard 20-year patent term from filing, subject to adjustments; effective market exclusivity depends on patent prosecution and maintenance.

5. What strategic steps should patentees take post-grant?
Monitor competitor filings, enforce patent rights proactively, and consider filing additional patents for extensions or formulations to extend protection.


References

[1] Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Lei nº 9.279/1996)
[2] Brazilian Patent Office (INPI) Publication Data
[3] World Trade Organization (WTO) TRIPS Agreement
[4] Patent landscape reports for pharmaceuticals in Brazil
[5] Industry reports on patent strategies for innovative drugs


Note: Precise claims language, detailed specification, and prosecution history are necessary for an in-depth legal analysis. This document provides a synthesized overview based on the available information and standard practices.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.