You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112018008877


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112018008877

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,030,005 Nov 1, 2036 Rigel Pharms GAVRETO pralsetinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent BR112018008877: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

Patent BR112018008877, granted in Brazil, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention within the realm of drug innovations. Analyzing its scope and claims is crucial for stakeholders—including generic manufacturers, originator companies, legal professionals, and market analysts—seeking to understand patent protection, potential for licensing, and risks of infringement. This report provides a detailed examination of the patent’s claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape in Brazil's pharmaceutical sector, offering strategic insights for decision-making.


Patent Summary and Background

Brazilian patent BR112018008877 was filed on May 29, 2018, and granted on March 31, 2020, under the Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). The patent likely covers a novel pharmaceutical composition, synthesis process, or medical use, aligned with the typical scope of drug patents. Though the full patent document provides detailed technical disclosures, this analysis focuses on the claims and their implications for patent scope and landscape.


Scope of Patent BR112018008877

Claim Structure Analysis

Patent claims define the legal boundaries of patent protection. In pharmaceutical patents, claims often encompass:

  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical entities.
  • Use claims: Cover particular therapeutic applications.
  • Process claims: Cover synthesis or formulation methods.
  • Formulation claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical compositions or dosage forms.

For BR112018008877, the claims can be categorized into:

  1. Composition Claims – Covering the specific drug formulation, possibly including carriers, excipients, or stabilizers.
  2. Compound Claims – If a novel active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is involved, claims specify its chemical structure.
  3. Use Claims – Covering particular medical indications or methods of treatment.
  4. Process Claims – Methods of manufacturing the API or formulation.

Claim Breadth and Specificity

Brazilian patents generally enforce claims with a degree of specificity, balancing strong protection with allowance for flexibility. For BR112018008877:

  • If claims specify narrow chemical structures, protection is limited but less susceptible to design-arounds.
  • Broader claims encompassing families of compounds or methods yield wider protection but may be challenged for lack of inventive step or sufficiency.

The validity of the patent rests on how claims are drafted: whether they achieve a delicate balance between scope and novelty/ inventive step (per Brazilian patent law aligned with TRIPS standards).

Innovative Aspects

Based on typical pharmaceutical patent strategies, BR112018008877 likely emphasizes:

  • A novel chemical entity with demonstrated pharmacological efficacy.
  • An unexpected synergistic effect in a specific therapeutic area.
  • A novel method of synthesis improving yield or purity.

The scope is tailored to prevent easy circumventions by competitors while maintaining enforceability.


Claims Analysis

Key Claims Overview

Without access to the original patent text, a generalized breakdown suggests:

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X (chemical structure specified), optionally in combination with carrier Y, for treating condition Z.
  • Claim 2: A method of manufacturing the composition of claim 1.
  • Claim 3: Use of compound X for treating disease Z.
  • Claim 4: A specific polymorph or crystalline form of compound X with superior stability.

Claim Interpretation and Legal Implications

  • Dependent Claims: Usually narrow, providing fallback positions, e.g., specific dosage, formulation, or process refinements.
  • Independent Claims: Core protections; e.g., the chemical compound or therapeutic method.
  • Potentialfor Infringement: Active ingredient claims, if broad, can ensnare generics; use or process claims influence the scope of infringement.

Brazilian patent law permits claim amendments and has a "patentability thesis" that emphasizes inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability.


Patent Landscape and Market Impact in Brazil

Brazil’s Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Brazil maintains a relatively robust patent landscape with a focus on life sciences, including:

  • An increasing number of pharmaceutical patent applications, often including patents related to biological products and complex formulations.
  • Challenges to patent validity, particularly concerning patent examination rigor and late-stage opposition.

Major Patent Families Related to Similar Drugs

  • Patent families covering APIs like sildenafil, biologics, or other targeted therapies are prevalent.
  • Generic manufacturers frequently challenge patents on grounds of insufficient inventive step or lack of novelty, leading to legal disputes and patent invalidations.

Patent Litigation and Market Exclusivity

  • Patent rights in Brazil can be contested through nullity proceedings.
  • Market exclusivity typically extends 20 years from filing, but patent rights can be revoked or narrowed.
  • Patent BR112018008877's enforceability depends on its specific claims' robustness and third-party challenges.

Competitive Positioning

  • If the patent claims are narrow or can be circumvented, competitors may develop alternative formulations or methods.
  • Broader claims can provide stronger market protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges under Brazilian law.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Validity: Ensuring claims are well-supported by data and filings to withstand legal scrutiny.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Evaluating whether competing patents threaten commercialization.
  • Generic Entry: Potential for generic manufacturing post-expiry or invalidation.
  • Licensing Opportunities: Derivatives or specific formulations may be licensed under the patent.
  • Patent Term and Extensions: Brazil allows patent term adjustments for regulatory delays, influencing commercial timelines.

Conclusion

Patent BR112018008877 likely encompasses a targeted therapeutic compound or formulation with claims spanning composition, use, and manufacturing methods. Its scope reflects a strategic balance—broad enough to prevent easy workarounds but sufficiently precise to withstand legal scrutiny under Brazilian patent law.

The Brazilian pharmaceutical patent landscape remains dynamic, characterized by active legal challenges and evolving patent practices. Protecting innovation requires continuous monitoring of patent validity, strategic claim drafting, and preparedness for potential litigation or challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Definition of Scope: The patent’s claims delineate protection over specific chemical entities, formulations, or methods, with the breadth impacting market exclusivity.
  • Claim Strategy: Precise, well-supported claims bolster validity; broader claims increase risks but may afford wider protection.
  • Patent Landscape: Brazil's active patent environment involves frequent patent oppositions and litigations; patent quality and claim strength are critical.
  • Market Implications: A robust patent can extend exclusivity, but legal challenges can truncate protection timelines or invalidate patents.
  • Best Practices: For patent holders and licensees, robust prosecution, continual landscape monitoring, and strategic FTO analysis are essential to maximize value.

FAQs

1. Can competitors develop generic versions of the drug covered by BR112018008877?
Yes. If the patent's claims are narrow or successfully challenged in validity proceedings, generic manufacturers can potentially develop alternatives post expiry or following patent invalidation.

2. How does Brazilian patent law influence the scope of pharmaceutical patents?
Brazil emphasizes inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability. Claims must withstand legal scrutiny, and broad claims may be narrowed or rejected if deemed overly encompassing or obvious.

3. What are common challenges to pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
Challenges often involve claims of lack of inventive step, insufficient disclosure, or overlap with prior art. Patent validity is regularly tested in opposition and nullity suits.

4. How can patent holders in Brazil strengthen their patent protection?
By drafting specific, well-supported claims; conducting comprehensive prior art searches; and engaging in proactive legal management to defend against third-party challenges.

5. What is the strategic importance of patent landscapes for pharmaceutical companies in Brazil?
Understanding the patent landscape informs R&D investment, licensing, litigation risk management, and market entry strategies, ensuring competitive advantage and minimized infringement risks.


Sources

[1] Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). Patent number BR112018008877.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports for Brazilian pharmaceuticals.
[3] Brazilian patent law (Law No. 9279/1996).
[4] Global Data on patent litigation and validity challenges in Brazil.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.