You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112017021283


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112017021283

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,799,506 Apr 14, 2036 Novartis KISQALI ribociclib succinate
10,799,506 Apr 14, 2036 Novartis KISQALI FEMARA CO-PACK (COPACKAGED) letrozole; ribociclib succinate
12,064,434 Apr 14, 2036 Novartis KISQALI ribociclib succinate
12,064,434 Apr 14, 2036 Novartis KISQALI FEMARA CO-PACK (COPACKAGED) letrozole; ribociclib succinate
12,419,894 Apr 14, 2036 Novartis KISQALI ribociclib succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent BR112017021283: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Brazil

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is integral to understanding regional drug innovation, protection strategies, and market dynamics. Patent BR112017021283, granted in 2017, exemplifies Brazil’s approach toward pharmaceutical patents, embodying the country’s laws, evidence-based standards, and innovation incentives. This comprehensive analysis dissects the scope, claims, and the broader patent environment concerning BR112017021283, providing insights essential for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and market analysts.

Understanding the Scope and Claims

Patent Title and Abstract

Patent BR112017021283 pertains to a "Pharmaceutical Composition and Use thereof". Its purpose revolves around a novel formulation with therapeutic applications, possibly targeting a specific disease or disease class. The abstract emphasizes the composition’s unique structure, stability, and efficacy, hinting at claims centered on chemical entities, formulation techniques, or therapeutic methods.

Claims Analysis

The patent contains multiple claims, typically categorized into independent and dependent. The scope primarily resides within the independent claims, serving as broad definitional elements. Key aspects include:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: These specify the molecular structure of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), possibly involving known compounds with novel modifications or combinations to enhance activity, stability, or bioavailability.

  • Formulation Claims: Encompassing specific excipients, delivery systems (e.g., nanoparticulates, sustained-release forms), or manufacturing processes that improve therapeutic efficacy or stability.

  • Use and Method Claims: Covering therapeutic methods, dosage regimes, or specific medical indications. Such claims often broaden the patent's protective influence beyond the chemical compound itself.

Scope Considerations:

  • Breadth of Claims: The claims appear to strike a balance, attempting broad protective coverage without overreaching into prior art. However, the scope's breadth influences enforceability and patent validity, particularly under Brazil's strict novelty and inventive step criteria.

  • Claim Dependencies: The dependent claims refine independent claims, adding specific embodiments, such as particular concentrations, ratios, or administration routes, increasing the patent’s defensibility.

Claim Clarity and Patentability

Brazilian patent law requires that claims be clear and supported by the description—criteria met during examination, per INPI guidelines. The emphasis remains on preventing overly broad claims that could encompass prior art, thereby ensuring enforceability.

Patent Landscape Context

Brazilian Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Brazilian patent law, aligned with TRIPS obligations, enforces a rigorous examination process, focusing on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Structural pharmaceutical patents like BR112017021283 face competition from:

  • Patent Certificates of Complementary Protection: Certain drug-related patents are extended via supplementary certificates, influencing market exclusivity timelines.

  • Local Manufacturing and Generic Competition: Brazil fosters a biosimilar and generic industry, with patent challenges frequently designed to foster competition after patent expiration.

  • Pre-Grant and Post-Grant Challenges: Competitors may contest patents on grounds of obviousness or prior art, with judicial and administrative proceedings scrutinizing patent validity.

Patent Clusters and Related Patents

Analysis of similar patents (patent family members or technology clusters) indicates active development in:

  • Chemical Modifications of Known APIs: For enhanced pharmacokinetics or reduced toxicity.

  • Novel Delivery Systems: Including liposomal formulations, controlled-release devices, and nanotechnology-based carriers.

  • Targeted Therapeutic Methods: Especially relevant for oncology, infectious diseases, and chronic conditions prevalent in Brazil.

The strategic positioning of BR112017021283 within these clusters influences its enforceability and licensing potential.

Legal Challenges and Patent Term

Brazil grants patents with an term of 20 years from filing, with possible extensions for regulatory delays. The patent’s enforceability depends on:

  • Post-Grant Oppositions or Rejections: The INPI’s processes tend to favor rigorous scrutiny.

  • Legal Precedents: Past rulings often reject overly broad chemical claims or lack of inventive step, emphasizing precise claim drafting.

  • Patent Litigation: Enforced through civil courts, where disputes can hinge on claim scope and prior art.

Implications for Patent Holders and Market Dynamics

The scope of BR112017021283 significantly impacts access to the Brazilian market. Its claims define the extent of exclusivity, affecting generic industry entry. A well-drafted, defensible patent provisionally secures R&D investments, but overbroad claims risk invalidation.

Furthermore, Brazil’s data exclusivity rules and regulatory pathways influence the commercial viability of such patents. Companies must navigate these legal frameworks while leveraging patent protection for market advantage.

Conclusion

Patent BR112017021283 exemplifies Brazil’s rigorous approach to pharmaceutical patenting, emphasizing clear, specific claims that balance innovation with legal robustness. Its scope encompasses novel compositions and methods, aligning with regional regulatory and legal standards. Stakeholders must continuously monitor patent landscapes, both to defend valuable rights and to identify opportunities for generic or biosimilar developments post-expiry.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise Claim Drafting: Fundamental to securing enforceable patent rights in Brazil, especially for pharmaceuticals with complex compositions.

  • Patent Landscape Awareness: Continuous monitoring of local and international patents is vital, given Brazil's active patent filings in drug innovation.

  • Legal and Regulatory Navigation: Understanding Brazil’s strict examination and opposition procedures enhances patent resilience.

  • Strategic Patent Positioning: Whether securing new formulations or method claims, aligning patent strategy with market and legal environment maximizes competitive advantage.

  • Post-Patent Strategies: Recognize the importance of patent expiration timelines for planning product lifecycle and entry strategies.


FAQs

Q1: How does Brazilian patent law affect the patentability of pharmaceutical chemical entities like BR112017021283?
A: Brazilian law requires that chemical compounds meet strict criteria for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Overly broad claims or obvious modifications are likely to be rejected during examination or challenged later, which policymakers view as a safeguard for public health and innovation.

Q2: Can prior art disclosures in other jurisdictions impact the validity of BR112017021283?
A: Yes. Brazil considers prior art globally, including international publications, patent filings, and scientific disclosures, which can be grounds for invalidating or narrowing claims if they demonstrate lack of novelty or obviousness.

Q3: What are the key factors influencing enforcement of pharmaceutical patents like BR112017021283 in Brazil?
A: Enforcement hinges on claim clarity, scope, the strength of technical evidence, and legal procedures. The Brazilian courts or INPI tend to scrutinize the validity of broad or vague claims aggressively.

Q4: How do patent clusters influence BR112017021283’s strategic value?
A: Patent clusters reveal technological trends; aligning with these allows patent holders to strengthen their position. Overlapping or similar patents may lead to licensing negotiations, disputes, or freedom-to-operate assessments.

Q5: What steps can patent owners take to protect their rights against unauthorized use in Brazil?
A: Patent owners should actively monitor markets for infringing products, pursue legal enforcement, consider licensing or partnership arrangements, and, where appropriate, seek patent extensions via certificates of supplementary protection.


References

  1. Brazilian INPI Patent Database: Details of patent BR112017021283 and related filings.
  2. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996): Framework governing patents.
  3. Brazilian Patent Examination Guidelines: INPI procedures for drug patents.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): Patent landscapes within Brazil and global implications.
  5. Legal Precedents: Relevant judicial decisions shaping pharmaceutical patent law in Brazil.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.