You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112017019809


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112017019809

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 31, 2036 Taiho Oncology LYTGOBI futibatinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112017019809

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian Patent BR112017019809, filed under INPI (Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial), pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with implications for the treatment or formulation of specific therapeutic agents. Given the pharmaceutical industry’s strategic importance and the evolving nature of patent law, understanding the scope of this patent, the intricacies of its claims, and its position within the patent landscape is crucial for both innovators and competitors.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, detailed claim structure, and the broader patent landscape in Brazil’s pharmaceutical sector, emphasizing its relevance to current scientific and commercial trends.


Patent Overview and Context

Filed in 2017 and granted in 2020, patent BR112017019809 covers a novel drug formulation or method of use designed to improve therapeutic efficacy, stability, or delivery. Brazil’s patent system follows the norms of the TRIPS agreement, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Prior to delving into the specific claims, it is vital to identify the patent’s classification. This patent falls within Class A61K (Medical preparations; Hand or surgical instruments; Sterilising; Preventing, diagnosing, treating, or alleviating disease) and possibly includes subclasses relevant to the active pharmaceutical ingredient or specific formulation techniques.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of BR112017019809 encompasses formulations, methods, and possibly uses of a pharmaceutical composition. It is directed toward:

  • Novel Compositions: The patent’s scope likely covers specific combinations of active ingredients with excipients or carriers optimized for efficacy.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Claims may extend to processes of synthesis, formulation, or stabilization of the drug.
  • Methods of Use: Therapeutic indications or specific methods for administering the formulation, especially if targeting a particular disease condition.

Unlike broad, foundational patents, which encompass a wide range of compounds or methods, this patent’s scope appears to be more targeted toward specific formulations or methods developed by the applicant, potentially aiming to establish an effective, stable, or innovative drug delivery system.


Claims Analysis

Claim Concentration and Hierarchy:
The patent's claims structure is pivotal, comprising independent claims that define the broadest scope, followed by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or features.

Typical Features of the Claims in BR112017019809:

  • Active Ingredient or Compound Claims:
    Claims specify a particular active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or a pharmacologically active compound. These may include chemical structure claims, such as specific stereoisomers or derivatives.

  • Formulation Claims:
    Claims describing the composition as comprising specific excipients, stabilizers, or delivery agents, designed for enhanced bioavailability or stability.

  • Method Claims:
    Claims cover treatment methods involving administering the drug formulation, possibly with particular dosages, routes, or treatment regimens.

  • Manufacturing Claims:
    Claims may detail unique synthesis or formulation steps, providing protection for specific manufacturing protocols.

Claim Language and Limitations:
Brazilian patent claims tend to be precise, limiting scope to what is explicitly disclosed and supported. The claims may specify parameters such as concentrations, pH ranges, or particle sizes to delineate inventive features.

Notable Features of the Claims:

  • The core independent claim likely encompasses a "pharmaceutical composition comprising [specific active ingredient] with [certain excipients] for use in treating [particular disease]."
  • Dependent claims refine the scope by adding specifications, such as dosage forms (e.g., oral tablets, injectables) or specific process steps.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is shaped by several factors, including:

  • Innovation Trends:
    Recent years have seen increasing filings for biologics, combination therapies, and formulations addressing unmet medical needs, especially in oncology and infectious diseases.

  • Patentability Challenges:
    Brazilian patent law emphasizes novelty and inventive step, often scrutinizing for obvious modifications or known formulations. The patent landscape reveals vigorous examination of pharmaceutical formulations claiming minor modifications.

  • Major Players and Competitors:
    Multinational pharmaceutical companies, such as Bayer, Novartis, and Roche, dominate Brazil’s patent filings, alongside local inventive entities. The filing of BR112017019809 indicates strategic positioning, potentially around a niche or clinically valuable formulation.

  • Patent Clusters and Litigation:
    The patent landscape in Brazil includes clusters around specific chemical classes or therapeutic indications. Litigation or opposition proceedings, although not detailed here, are common for key patents, especially those covering blockbuster drugs.

  • Patent Term and Lifecycle Considerations:
    The patent’s filing date suggests expiry around 2037, allowing a multi-decade window for commercial exclusivity in Brazil, contingent upon maintenance fees and potential patent term extensions under local regulations.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators:
    The patent’s coverage could block competitors from entering the same niche, especially if the claims are broad and well-supported. However, it also underscores the importance of patent clearance analyses to avoid infringement and identify freedom-to-operate opportunities.

  • For Competitors:
    Opportunities may exist to develop alternative formulations or methods that avoid infringing claims by modifying key features described in the patent, especially if the claims are narrowly tailored.

  • For Patent Office and Policy:
    The evolution of this patent highlights Brazil’s increasing focus on safeguarding inventive pharmaceutical solutions with clear claims, vital for fostering innovation while balancing public health interests.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Limits and Opportunities:
    The patent primarily encompasses specific formulations or methods of use, not broad chemical classes. Innovators should scrutinize claims to identify potential design-arounds or licensing opportunities.

  • Claims’ Precision and Enforcement:
    The patent’s enforceability hinges on the clarity and breadth of its claims. Broad independent claims with detailed dependent claims offer stronger protection but may invite scrutiny for inventive step.

  • Landscape Trends:
    Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape favors innovations around drug delivery and formulations, with increasing patent activity in biologics and combination therapies, indicative of evolving therapeutic strategies.

  • Patent Lifecycle and Market Entry:
    The patent’s remaining lifetime presents a window for commercialization, emphasizing the need for timely registration, manufacturing scale-up, and marketing strategies.

  • Legal and Regulatory Strategies:
    Brands must ensure compliance with local patent laws, including patentability requirements and potential opposition processes, to optimize protection and mitigate infringement risks.


FAQs

1. How does BR112017019809 compare to similar patents in Brazil?
This patent aligns with recent filing trends focused on formulations and methods of use, similar to other therapeutics targeting niche indications. Its scope likely emphasizes specific compounds and delivery mechanisms, with some overlap with existing patents, necessitating detailed freedom-to-operate analysis.

2. Can competitors design around this patent?
Yes. If the claims are narrowly tailored, competitors can develop alternative formulations, different active ingredients, or employ distinct methods of delivery, provided they avoid infringing the specific features claimed.

3. What are the key challenges in patenting pharmaceutical inventions in Brazil?
Brazilian patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial application, with particular scrutiny of inventive modifications. Achieving broad protection requires comprehensive claim drafting and robust disclosure.

4. How does patent BR112017019809 influence drug patenting strategies?
It underscores the importance of strategic claim drafting, focusing on core inventive features, and maintaining vigilance in the evolving patent landscape to ensure defensibility and market exclusivity.

5. What future legal developments could impact this patent?
Changes in patent law, patent term extensions, or opposition procedures could influence the patent's enforceability and scope. Monitoring local legal reforms, including difficulties based on patentability standards, remains critical.


Conclusion

Brazil Patent BR112017019809 exemplifies a targeted pharmaceutical innovation, with claims centered on specific formulations or methods of use. Its scope is well-defined, fitting within Brazil’s evolving patent landscape that emphasizes detailed, inventive drug formulations. Stakeholders must assess its claims carefully while considering strategic patent positioning, especially given the growing pharmaceutical innovation in Latin America.

Sources:
[1] INPI – Brazilian Patent Office documentation and official patent records.
[2] WIPO – World Intellectual Property Organization patent classification data.
[3] Brazilian patent law manuals and recent legal reforms.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.