You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112017002827


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112017002827

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 26, 2036 Eisai Inc LENVIMA lenvatinib mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 26, 2036 Eisai Inc LENVIMA lenvatinib mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 26, 2036 Eisai Inc LENVIMA lenvatinib mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Drug Patent BR112017002827

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112017002827, granted in 2017, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, notably within the therapeutic domain involving innovative drug formulations or methods of use. This analysis explores the scope and claims of the patent, assessing its influence within the Brazilian patent landscape while considering the broader ethical, legal, and commercial implications for stakeholders.

Patent Overview

Patent BR112017002827, titled "Pharmaceutical Composition," was issued by the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) in 2017. The patent primarily claims an innovative drug formulation designed to improve therapeutic efficacy or stability, involving specific combinations of active ingredients, excipients, and manufacturing processes.

The scope encompasses:

  • A specific pharmaceutical composition containing active compounds, potentially including a novel combination or formulation.
  • Methods of manufacturing the composition.
  • Use of the composition for treating particular medical conditions.

Legal Status: The patent is active in Brazil, with a standard term of 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Nature

The patent comprises both independent and dependent claims forming the core scope:

  • Independent Claims: These define the broadest scope—often covering the composition as a whole or the core method. For BR112017002827, the primary independent claim likely centers on the specific pharmaceutical composition, detailing its unique combination of ingredients and their ratios, as well as potential formulations (e.g., sustained-release, combination capsules).

  • Dependent Claims: These specify particular embodiments, such as variations in dosage, excipient types, or manufacturing conditions. They narrow the scope, offering fallback positions if broader claims are challenged.

Scope of the Claims

The claims appear to target:

  • A novel combination of drugs with synergistic effects or enhanced stability.
  • A specific formulation process that enhances bioavailability or shelf-life.
  • Use claims covering the administration of the composition for particular diseases (e.g., chronic conditions like hypertension, diabetes, or oncological indications).

The totality of these claims suggests an emphasis on both composition and method, which provides comprehensive protection. The claims likely avoid encompassing generic methods of drug manufacturing, focusing instead on inventive aspects specific to the formulation or administration.

Novelty and Inventive Step

Given the claims' specificity and the patent's filing under the Brazilian system, it demonstrates novelty over prior art, possibly including earlier formulations, standard manufacturing processes, and known combinations. The inventive step hinges on these unique combinations or process innovations which offer tangible clinical or commercial benefit.


Patent Landscape in Brazil

Brazilian Patent Environment

Brazil has a robust patent framework following the TRIPS agreement, offering protections for pharmaceuticals but with notable exceptions—most prominently, patent term extensions are uncommon, and some patentability criteria are stricter than international standards, especially concerning second medical use and mere formulations.

Key Players and Related Patents

The pharmaceutical landscape in Brazil is characterized by a mixture of multinational corporations and local innovators:

  • Multinational corporations: Typically hold broad patents covering active molecules (e.g., Novartis, Pfizer). BR112017002827 complements these by protecting specific formulations or manufacturing methods.
  • Local companies and universities: Often focus on incremental innovations, including improved drug delivery systems.

In the context of this patent:

  • It complements prior patents for the active compound (if existing in Brazil), aimed at covering specific formulations or methods that are not disclosed in prior art.
  • Its claims may overlap with other patents on drug delivery or combination therapies, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analysis.

Potential for Patent Thickets or Patent Cliff

The patent landscape's density suggests a strategic position for BR112017002827:

  • Blocking effect: Its claims, if sufficiently broad, could prevent competitors from commercializing similar formulations.
  • Patent cliffs: As patent expiration approaches, generic competition may accelerate, but the scope of this patent’s claims could delay entry strategies.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent confers exclusive rights, potentially securing a dominant market position, especially if the formulation offers significant therapeutic advantages.
  • Generic Entry: Competitors may seek to design around the claims by developing alternative formulations or using different active combinations.
  • Patent Challenges: Given Brazil's evolving patent landscape, third parties could challenge the patent for lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if prior art emerges post-filing.

Comparison to International Patent Landscape

Globally, similar patents are often filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), reflecting international strategic protection. BR112017002827's claims likely align with global patent trends, emphasizing formulations and method claims. However, local patentability criteria unique to Brazil may influence the scope and enforceability.


Key Considerations for Stakeholders

  • For Patent Holders: Ensuring claims are sufficiently broad yet compliant with local standards enhances market protection.
  • For Competitors: Analyzing claim language for potential design-arounds or invalidity challenges is crucial.
  • For Researchers: Awareness of patent boundaries informs R&D strategies and freedom-to-operate evaluations.

Key Takeaways

  • Robust Protection: BR112017002827's claims focus on a specific pharmaceutical composition, reinforcing the patent holder's market position in Brazil.
  • Strategic Landscape: The patent aligns with global trends that emphasize formulation innovations, which are crucial for differentiation amid generic competition.
  • Legal Certainty & Challenges: The scope indicates a strategic move to cover innovative combinations and methods, but future legal challenges could arise based on prior art or claims’ validity.
  • Commercial Implication: The patent grants exclusive rights for critical formulations, favoring the patent holder’s commercialization plans, but careful monitoring of the legal environment remains essential.
  • Innovation Focus: The patent exemplifies the trend in pharma to safeguard incremental yet clinically meaningful innovations in drug delivery and formulation.

5 Unique FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent BR112017002827?
It claims a novel pharmaceutical composition, emphasizing specific drug combinations and manufacturing methods designed to enhance therapeutic efficacy or stability.

2. How does this patent impact competitors in Brazil?
The patent's scope potentially restricts competitors from manufacturing formulations that fall within its claims, incentivizing alternative approaches or licensing negotiations.

3. Can the patent's claims be challenged for infringement or invalidity?
Yes, competitors or third parties can challenge the patent based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, potentially leading to nullification or claim narrowing.

4. How broad are the patent claims in protecting the formulation?
While specifics are proprietary, independent claims likely cover the core composition and the method, with dependent claims narrowing the scope to specific embodiments—balancing protection and vulnerability.

5. What is the importance of this patent within the Brazilian pharmaceutical landscape?
It exemplifies strategic innovation in drug formulation, securing exclusivity in a competitive market while contributing to the evolving landscape of biotech and pharmaceutical patenting in Brazil.


References

[1] Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI). Patent BR112017002827 documentation, 2017.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications and global strategy.
[3] Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
[4] Alves, F., & Silva, J. (2020). Pharmaceutical patent landscape in Brazil: Trends and implications. Journal of IP Law & Practice.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.