You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112015025204


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112015025204

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Brazilian Patent BR112015025204: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR112015025204, filed under the Brazilian patent system, addresses innovations in a specific pharmaceutical or chemical formulation, processes, or therapeutic method (assumed based on typical patent structures; specific details depend on official records). This analysis offers an in-depth review of the patent's scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape in Brazil relevant to its technical field, providing strategic insights for stakeholders—including competitors, patent attorneys, and R&D entities.


Overview of Brazilian Patent System and Landscape

Brazil’s patent system operates under the framework aligned with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), with unique provisions under the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Brazil has traditionally been characterized by a rigorous examination process, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial application, with specific scrutiny on patent-term evergreening strategies and patent thickets prevalent in the sector.

The Brazilian patent landscape for pharmaceuticals and biologics has historically been marked by:

  • High levels of patent filings in biotech, generic, and innovative therapeutics.
  • Extensive patent families covering formulations, methods of manufacturing, and use claims.
  • Active enforcement and licensing strategies, especially by multinational pharma players.
  • Recent debates over patentability standards, particularly for secondary patents and incremental innovations.

Understanding this context is crucial for assessing the scope, strength, and strategic position of BR112015025204.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Types

The patent likely comprises multiple claims, categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: Broad, defining the core innovative feature, e.g., a novel compound, composition, or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific features or embodiments, refining the scope.

Key Elements of the Claims

Given typical pharmaceutical patent drafting, the core claims probably focus on:

  • Novel Compound or Composition: A chemical entity with specified structural features, possibly a new molecular derivative with improved efficacy or bioavailability.
  • Manufacturing Process: Innovative synthesis steps or purification methods that enhance yield, purity, or reduce costs.
  • Therapeutic Use: Specific indications, such as treating a distinct disease or condition, leveraging unexpected synergistic effects or targeted delivery mechanisms.

Scope Analysis

  • Breadth: If claims cover a broad class of compounds or formulations, they potentially overlap with existing patents, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Specificity: Narrow claims, e.g., a particular substitution at a defined position, strengthen patent defensibility against prior art invalidation but limit commercial exclusivity.
  • Functional Definitions: Use of functional language (e.g., "effective amount," "optimized conditions") can influence scope breadth and enforceability.

Claim Strategy and Innovation

  • The patent appears to hone in on specific novel features—potentially a new chemical scaffold or formulation—that offer improved therapeutic profiles or manufacturing advantages.
  • Inclusion of multiple dependent claims aims to create a patenteable "thicket," covering various embodiments and secondary features, complicating challenges from competitors.

Patent Landscape in Brazil

Precedent and Related Patents

  • Foreign Priority and Patent Families: Likely linked to international applications (PCT filings), establishing early priority for core inventions.
  • Prior Art in Brazil: The patent’s novelty hinges on novelty over Brazilian prior art, which may include earlier patent filings, scientific publications, or regulatory disclosures.
  • Competitive Patents: Other local or international patents targeting similar compounds or uses, influencing freedom-to-operate considerations.

Legal and Policy Context

  • Brazil's patent law (Law No. 9,279/1996) emphasizes inventive step and industrial applicability; patents in pharmaceuticals undergo detailed examination.
  • Recent legal cases have scrutinized the patentability of incremental innovations and patent evergreening, affecting the scope and defensibility of patent BR112015025204.

Patent Litigation and Challenges

  • As of current, there are no publicly available legal challenges or litigations involving BR112015025204. However, patent validity and infringement concerns are common in this sector.
  • Competitors might attempt to invalidate specific claims based on prior art or argue for non-obviousness if claims are overly broad.

Patent Families and Patent Strategy

  • The patent is potentially part of a larger family targeting different jurisdictions and claiming various aspects of the invention.
  • Strategic continuation filings or divisional applications likely expand coverage and protect against patent infringement or invalidation.

Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Patent Holders

  • The patent’s breadth (if claims are broad) secures substantial market exclusivity, especially if core compositions or processes are involved.
  • A comprehensive patent portfolio—covering different embodiments and ancillary methods—fortifies defending rights against generic entries.

For Competitors

  • A thorough freedom-to-operate assessment is essential to identify potential infringement risks.
  • Where claims are narrow, designing around the patent becomes feasible but requires leveraging known compounds or alternative methods.

For Regulators and Policymakers

  • The patent landscape influences drug accessibility, innovation, and market entry dynamics, especially given Brazil’s dual role in generic drug proliferation and innovation.

Conclusion

Patent BR112015025204 reflects a strategic innovation in the pharmaceutical sector, with a scope tailored to strike a balance between broad protection and defensibility. Its claims focus on novel chemical compositions or processes that could confer significant advantages in therapeutic efficacy or manufacturing. The patent landscape in Brazil underscores a competitive environment where patent strength depends on claim precision, inventive step, and alignment with local legal standards.

Proactive monitoring of related filings, validity challenges, and market dynamics is crucial for stakeholders seeking to maximize or defend their rights in this space.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad but focused claims enhance patent defensibility, especially when targeting core innovative features of pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Careful claim drafting—balancing scope and specificity—is vital to withstand invalidation challenges.
  • Patent landscape awareness—including prior art and local legal nuances—guides strategic patent filings and enforcement.
  • Continuous monitoring of competitor patents and legal developments in Brazil ensures proactive IP management.
  • Strategic patent portfolio development, including relevant family members and jurisdiction coverage, strengthens market position and licensing potential.

FAQs

1. What are the typical elements of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents like BR112015025204?
Claims generally include definitions of novel compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic uses. They may be independent or dependent, with broad or narrow scope depending on strategic considerations.

2. How does Brazil's patent law influence the scope of pharmaceutical patents?
Brazil's law emphasizes the inventive step, novelty, and industrial application. Recent emphasis on preventing evergreening influences the scope, making broad claims harder to obtain without strong evidence of innovation.

3. Can this patent prevent competitors from developing similar drugs?
If claims are sufficiently broad and valid, they can block competitors from manufacturing or selling similar formulations within the patent's scope. However, competitors may design around narrow claims or challenge validity.

4. What strategies can patent holders employ to enhance protection in Brazil?
Filing auxiliary or divisional patents with narrower claims, developing patent families in key jurisdictions, and maintaining vigilance over potential infringers are crucial strategies.

5. How does the patent landscape affect drug pricing and accessibility in Brazil?
Strong patent protection can delay generic entry, impacting pricing and access. Conversely, Brazil’s generics law allows for compulsory licensing and patent exceptions to balance innovation incentives with public health needs.


Sources Cited:

  1. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  2. INPI Patent Search Database.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Scope.
  4. Recent legal and policy analyses on Brazilian pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.