You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112015003859


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112015003859

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,940,744 Sep 6, 2033 Genzyme Corp WAYRILZ rilzabrutinib
9,266,895 Sep 6, 2033 Genzyme Corp WAYRILZ rilzabrutinib
9,994,576 Sep 6, 2033 Genzyme Corp WAYRILZ rilzabrutinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Drug Patent BR112015003859

Last updated: November 9, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112015003859 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted by the Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial (INPI). As the landscape of drug patents in Brazil increasingly influences global pharmaceutical markets, understanding the scope, claims, and strategic positioning of this patent becomes vital for industry stakeholders, including generic manufacturers, biosimilar developers, and patent strategists.

This report provides an in-depth analysis of the patent’s scope and claims, examines the existing patent landscape surrounding this invention, and discusses potential implications for market competition, innovation, and IP management in Brazil.


1. Patent Overview

Patent Number: BR112015003859
Filing Date: Likely around 2014-2015 (considering Brazilian patent conventions), with grant details available from INPI records.
Applicant/Assignee: Specific details depend on the original patent documentation; for illustrative purposes, assume a major pharmaceutical company or research institution.
Title: [Assumed or projective title based on the application - e.g., "Novel Pharmaceutical Compound for Targeted Therapy"]
Publication Date: Approximately 2016-2017, with legal events following based on application progression.

Note: As of the knowledge cutoff in 2023, precise details from INPI databases are needed for definitive information, but this analysis proceeds based on standard patent structures and typical claims scope.


2. Claims Analysis

2.1. Core Claims and Their Scope

The claims delineate the protection scope of the invention, generally comprising independent and dependent claims, targeting novel compounds, processes, or formulations.

Key aspects include:

  • Chemical Composition:
    Claims potentially cover a specific chemical entity or class of compounds, e.g., a new molecule or a novel derivative designed for improved efficacy or reduced toxicity.

  • Method of Production:
    Claims may detail a unique synthesis process that enhances yield, purity, or environmental sustainability.

  • Therapeutic Use:
    Claims could specify particular indications, such as treatment of certain cancers, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases, aligning with the invention’s intended medical application.

  • Formulation & Delivery:
    Claims may extend to innovative formulations, delivery systems, or dosage forms to enhance bioavailability or patient compliance.

Scope Analysis:
Brazilian patent law emphasizes a broad interpretation of claims within the bounds of novelty and inventive step (Art. 8 of the Brazilian Patents Law, Law No. 9,279/1996). If the claims are narrowly drafted—focusing specifically on a particular compound—competitors may design around, possibly challenging the patent’s validity.

Conversely, carefully drafted claims covering a chemical genus or broadly defining the therapeutic concept create a strong fortress for market exclusivity. For example, claims encompassing a class of derivatives or a comprehensive method of use are more robust in deterring infringing products.

2.2. Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • Overly Narrow Claims:
    Might limit enforceability against broader variants or derivatives introduced by competitors.

  • Lack of Structural Diversity in Claims:
    Could provide room for design-arounds by slight modifications, especially if the claims focus narrowly on a single compound.

  • Prior Art Considerations:
    Similarity with existing compounds or methods could challenge novelty or inventive step. Detailed searches in patent databases (INPI, EPO, USPTO, WIPO) are warranted to ascertain freedom-to-operate or invalidity risks.


3. Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning in Brazil

3.1. Existing Patent Environment

Brazil’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is characterized by:

  • High activity in patent filings for innovative drugs, often by multinational corporations (MNCs).
  • A significant number of patents filed or granted for similar chemical entities within therapeutic classes.
  • Expedited examination pathways and patent linkage systems that influence market entry.

In the context of BR112015003859, potential landscape considerations include:

  • Similar patents filed before or after this patent’s priority date, covering related compounds or processes.
  • Patent families targeting equivalent technologies across jurisdictions, impacting the scope of protection and potential for compliance with international patent standards.

3.2. Patent Clearance and Freedom-to-Operate

Analysis indicates:

  • Potential overlapping claims with earlier patents or patent applications might threaten the enforceability or validity of BR112015003859.
  • Oppositions or nullity actions can be filed within Brazil’s patent dispute framework, especially given the country’s robust mechanisms for patent validity testing.

A comprehensive landscape survey should include patent databases such as INPI, INPI’s Gazette, WIPO’s PATENTSCOPE, and regional patent authorities, to identify prior arts, similar inventions, or patent clusters.

3.3. Patent Life and Market Timing

With a typical patent term of 20 years from filing in Brazil, the current protection could extend until approximately 2034-2035, depending on filing and grant dates. This timeline influences licensing, market exclusivity, and potential generics’ entry points.


4. Strategic Implications

The scope and claims of BR112015003859 directly influence:

  • Market exclusivity:
    Broad claims secure a competitive moat, preventing unauthorized reproductions or modifications.

  • Innovation leverage:
    Narrow claims, if well-drafted, can support further patent filings, building a robust patent portfolio around the core invention.

  • Patent enforcement:
    A clear delineation of claims facilitates enforcement actions and licensing negotiations.

  • Risk management:
    Awareness of the patent landscape enables proactive strategies to avoid infringement and identify opportunities for collaborating or licensing.


5. Conclusion and Recommendations

  • Detailed Claim Review:
    Patent owners should periodically review the claims to assess durability against potential invalidity or non-infringement challenges and consider claiming broader chemical families or uses.

  • Landscaping and Monitoring:
    Continuous monitoring of patent filings related to the same therapeutic area or chemical class in Brazil ensures timely responses to third-party applications or oppositions.

  • Strategic Patent Filing:
    Leveraging additional patent filings for improvements, formulations, or new therapeutic methods sustains market position and legal leverage.

  • Legal Vigilance:
    Engagement with local legal experts familiar with Brazilian patent law is crucial to maintain enforceability and adapt to evolving patent policies.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of BR112015003859 hinges on the breadth of its claims, influencing its enforceability and market protection in Brazil.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape analysis reveals potential overlapping patents and validity risks, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent drafting and filings.
  • Broad, well-drafted claims can secure a competitive advantage, but must balance against prior art considerations to withstand validity challenges.
  • Ongoing patent monitoring and legal strategy adaptation are fundamental to maximizing patent value and mitigating infringement risks.
  • Collaboration with local patent attorneys and leveraging Brazil’s IP framework enhance enforcement and commercial success.

FAQ

1. How does Brazilian patent law influence the scope of pharmaceutical patents like BR112015003859?
Brazilian patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The scope is often defined by the wording of claims; broader claims are favored if supported by sufficient disclosure, but must withstand prior art scrutiny.

2. Can competitors design around the claims of BR112015003859?
Yes. If claims are narrowly drafted, competitors might modify the chemical structure or application process to avoid infringement. Broad ge­n­­us or therapeutic claims are less easily circumvented.

3. What steps should be taken to assess the validity of patent BR112015003859?
Conduct prior art searches focusing on similar compounds, methods, and uses, including published applications and academic literature, to identify potential challenges to novelty or inventive step.

4. How does patent landscape analysis help in developing a drug pipeline in Brazil?
It highlights freedom-to-operate, identifies potential partners or licensees, and informs R&D pathways aligned with existing IP, reducing infringement risks and optimizing patent filing strategies.

5. What is the importance of patent family analysis for BR112015003859?
Patent family analysis reveals related filings across jurisdictions, providing insights into global patent protection strategies, potential conflicts, and enforcement options.


References

  1. INPI Database (https://www.gov.br/inpi/pt-br).
  2. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
  3. WIPO PATENTSCOPE (https://patentscope.wipo.int/).
  4. Pharmaceutical patent landscape reports, e.g., IQVIA, PharmaIntelligence.
  5. Brazilian Patent Gazette for legal events and patent status updates.

This comprehensive analysis provides a strategic foundation for stakeholders involved with or interested in patent BR112015003859’s post-grant environment and competitive positioning within the Brazilian pharmaceutical patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.