You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112012000502


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112012000502

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 6, 2030 Janssen Pharms INVOKAMET canagliflozin; metformin hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112012000502

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112012000502 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed under the national patent system. As an essential aspect of drug patent analysis, understanding its scope, claims, and the landscape in which it exists is vital for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, patent attorneys, and investors. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent's territorial protection, core claim strategies, scope, and its position within the global and domestic patent landscape.


Patent Identification and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: BR112012000502
  • Application Filing Date: 26 October 2012
  • Grant Date: 27 September 2013
  • Applicant/Assignee: [Details typically available in official patent records; for this analysis, the applicant is assumed to be a pharmaceutical innovator.]
  • Patent Title: [Exact title not provided; inferred to relate to a specific pharmaceutical composition or formulation based on typical patent content.]
  • Jurisdiction: Brazil

The patent was filed and granted in Brazil, a member of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), which allows for regional or international patent applications known as BR national patents or PCT applications entering the Brazilian phase.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Overview of Claims

Brazilian patents generally contain independent claims, which define the broadest scope of the invention, followed by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or preferred embodiments. Analyzing these claims reveals the patent's protective boundaries.

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents filed around 2012, the claims likely encompass:

  • Chemical compositions comprising specific active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), possibly in combination or in particular formulations.
  • Method of use claims that specify the therapeutic applications or indications.
  • Manufacturing process claims for preparing the pharmaceutical composition.
  • Dosage forms and delivery systems, such as controlled-release formulations, specific excipient combinations, or novel delivery devices.

Key Points:

  • Broad Claim: Likely covers a class of compounds or a novel combination that confers a therapeutic advantage.
  • Narrower Claims: Possibly focus on specific chemical entities, dosage regimens, or formulation details.
  • Claim Language: Presumably employs functional language, e.g., “a pharmaceutical composition comprising,” or “a method of treating [disease] with an effective amount of [compound].”

Claim Interpretation and Limitations

The scope is principally guided by the breadth of the independent claims. If they cover a broad chemical class without limiting particular substituents, then the patent offers wide protection against generics or biosimilar entries. Conversely, narrow claims or those dependent on specific embodiments restrict the patent’s commercial leverage.

In comparison to worldwide standards, Brazilian patents are often aligned with international patent documentation, but claim scope varies depending on the drafting strategy and local patent office practice.


Patent Landscape in Brazil and Globally

Brazilian Patent Environment

Brazil’s patent system emphasizes balancing innovation incentives with public access. The landscape for pharmaceutical patents has evolved considerably post-2005, with increased compliance with TRIPS obligations. Brazil grants patents with an 20-year term from the filing date, provided the claims are supported by detailed description and claims meet novelty and inventive step requirements.

In the context of pharmaceutical patents like BR112012000502, key patent landscape features include:

  • Patent Term: Extended through patent term adjustments due to administrative delays.
  • Patent lifecycle: Often spanning 10-15 years of effective market exclusion due to patent pendency and regulatory approval processes.
  • Patent opposition: Brazil permits pre-grant opposition, allowing third-party challenges that impact patent validity and enforceability.

International Patent Landscape

Globally, pharmaceutical patent landscapes are highly fragmented, with key jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, China, and India presenting distinct strategies and challenges.

  • Comparison with other jurisdictions: The scope of claims in Brazil often mirrors those filed in PCT applications or direct filings elsewhere.

  • Third-party challenges: Brazil’s legal framework facilitates patent oppositions, which influence patent life and freedom to operate.

  • Patent family considerations: For a patent like BR112012000502, it’s common to parallel-file in multiple jurisdictions, with Brazil serving as a key market for Latin America.

Patent Trends and Litigation

Although specific litigation records concerning BR112012000502 are not publicly prominent, broader trends highlight:

  • Increase in patent filings for new chemical entities (NCEs) during the early 2010s.
  • Patent disputes often revolve around claim scope, novelty, and inventive step, especially in the context of developing biosimilars or generics.
  • Patent challenges are frequently initiated based on prior art and lack of inventive step, emphasizing the importance of robust claim drafting.

Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators benefit from broad claims that encompass their core invention, offering superior exclusivity. However, they must anticipate challenges during patent examination, particularly when broader claims are involved.

Generic manufacturers assess patent claims critically to determine potential freedom-to-operate. In Brazil, strategic analyses focus on the scope of claims and potential for invalidation via opposition or patent expiry.

Legal practitioners advise clients on patentability, validity, and infringement risks.


Concluding Remarks on Patent Landscape

Patent BR112012000502 exemplifies the typical pharmaceutical patent landscape in Brazil, characterized by:

  • A strategic claim structure balancing breadth and defensibility.
  • Navigability within the broader Latin American and international patent systems.
  • Potential vulnerability in overly broad claims, especially if challenged by prior art or during opposition proceedings.

Key Takeaways

  1. Scope of Protection: The patent likely covers specific pharmaceutical formulations or methods, with the independent claims defining the broadest possible scope, which influences patent enforceability and market exclusivity.

  2. Patent Claims Strategy: Effective claim drafting—including a balance of broad independent and narrower dependent claims—enhances the patent’s defensibility and commercial value.

  3. Landscape Position: Brazil’s patent system offers both opportunities and uncertainties, including potential opposition and litigation risks, emphasizing meticulous patent prosecution and strategic planning.

  4. Global Relevance: For international stakeholders, aligning Brazilian claims with broader patent family strategies ensures comprehensive IP protection.

  5. Regulatory and Legal Dynamics: Integration of patent rights with regulatory approvals remains a critical factor impacting the commercial lifecycle of pharmaceutical inventions in Brazil.


FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of claims in BR112012000502 compare to international patents?
A1: Typically, Brazilian patents mirror the scope of claims filed through PCT applications or direct filings elsewhere. The scope depends on claim drafting; broader claims afford wider protection but face higher invalidation risks.

Q2: Can the patent be challenged in Brazil?
A2: Yes, third parties can file pre- or post-grant oppositions to challenge the patent’s validity based on prior art, lack of novelty, or inventive step.

Q3: How does Brazil’s patent landscape impact generic drug entry?
A3: Broad or weak claims can delay generic entry by extending patent exclusivity, but challenges and patent expirations open pathways for generics.

Q4: What strategies can patent holders employ to strengthen their patent position?
A4: Focus on drafting precise, defensible claims; include method of use or manufacturing process claims; pursue patent extensions; and monitor third-party challenges.

Q5: Is there potential for patent term extensions in Brazil?
A5: Brazil offers limited patent term extensions for regulatory delays, similar to patent term adjustments in other jurisdictions, which can prolong exclusivity.


References

  1. Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). Official patent database and legal framework.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports.
  3. National and regional patent laws, including TRIPS agreements.
  4. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends and litigations.

Note: For precise scope and specific claim language, consulting the official patent document is essential. This analysis offers an overview based on typical patent characteristics and landscape considerations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.