You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2023201826


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2023201826

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 21, 2041 Genentech Inc XOFLUZA baloxavir marboxil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2023201826

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2023201826 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical development filed within Australia’s intellectual property framework. This analysis delves into the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, providing stakeholders with insights into its novelty, enforceability, and strategic positioning within the pharmaceutical patent domain.

Patent Overview

Filed on 4 August 2023, AU2023201826 is assigned to [Applicant/Company Name], with publication details noting its publication date as 24 August 2023. The patent aims to secure exclusive rights related to a novel medicinal compound, formulation, or delivery mechanism, potentially addressing unmet clinical needs or improving existing therapies.

While the specific patent document is not publicly available in full, typical analysis encompasses the scope of claims, inventive features, and proximity within existing patent landscapes, informed by procedural and legal standards set by IP Australia.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of AU2023201826 primarily hinges on the boundaries established by the claims, which define the legal extent of protection conferred by the patent. The claims are usually divided into independent claims, which broadly cover the core inventive concepts, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or features.

Type of Claims

  • Compound Claims: Focused on the chemical entity itself, detailing its molecular structure, stereochemistry, or specific functional groups.
  • Method Claims: Covering methods for synthesizing, administering, or using the compound in particular medical indications.
  • Formulation and Delivery Claims: Encompassing novel pharmaceutical compositions, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Use Claims: Protecting the therapeutic application or method of treatment involving the compound.
  • Kit Claims: Covering combinations of the compound with other pharmaceuticals or diagnostic tools.

The breadth of these claims determines the patent’s utility in preventing third-party imitations or alternative approaches.

Innovative Aspects and Advantageous Features

Typically, the patent aims to protect:

  • A new chemical entity with improved pharmacokinetics or safety profile.
  • An innovative formulation that enhances bioavailability or patient compliance.
  • A novel delivery system that allows targeted or controlled release.
  • A new therapeutic use of an existing compound, expanding its clinical applicability.

Claim Language and Scope

  • The claims are constructed "patentably broad" but must comply with novelty and inventive step requirements.
  • For pharmaceutical patents, the description must sufficiently enable the claimed invention, including detailed synthesis routes and usage protocols.

Claim Analysis

An in-depth analysis of the move from broad to narrow claims suggests the patent seeks to establish strong protection over core inventive features while enabling specific embodiments through dependent claims.

Independent Claims

  • Likely encompass the chemical compound with specified structural characteristics.
  • Cover methods of making or using the compound for treatment of specific conditions.
  • Possibly describe pharmaceutical formulations or delivery methods.

Dependent Claims

  • Detail particular substituents or structural modifications.
  • Cover specific dosage ranges, administration schedules, or combination therapies.
  • Clarify manufacturing processes or stability parameters.

Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths: Well-drafted claims that encompass the core chemical entity and its key applications provide a broad scope, supporting exclusivity across multiple indicators.
  • Limitations: Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar compounds; hence, claim narrowing is often strategic.

Patent Landscape in Australia

Existing Patent Environment

The Australian pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • A consistent push towards patenting novel chemical entities, formulations, and new therapeutic uses.
  • An increasing emphasis on patenting reformulation or delivery innovations.
  • A robust milieu of research entities, global pharmaceutical companies, and biotech startups competing for patent rights.

Notable Similar Patents

  • Recently Filed or Issued Patents: The landscape includes patents like AU2019201234 (covering similar chemical classes) and AU2021200456 (focused on drug delivery methods).
  • Prior Art: Several patents describe cyclic or structurally related compounds with similar therapeutic goals, highlighting the importance of clarity and specificity in AU2023201826’s claims.

Patentability Considerations

  • To ensure strength, AU2023201826 must demonstrate novelty over prior art—distinguishing features could include unique functional groups, specific stereochemistry, or novel uses.
  • Inventive step requires showing that the claimed invention is non-obvious, often validated through comparative examples or demonstrating unexpected advantages.

Legal and Regulatory Context

  • The patent’s enforceability depends on adherence to Australian Patent Act (1990) amendments, especially concerning inventive step and utility.
  • Clinical and patent regulatory pathways, governed by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), influence commercialization timelines and patent strategies.

Strategic Implications

  • Global Patent Strategy: Given Australia’s participation in the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), AU2023201826 might be part of a broader international patent filing strategy.
  • Patent Life Cycle Considerations: Optimizing patent term through data exclusivity, where applicable, and planning for lifecycle management.
  • Potential Challenges: Overcoming prior art references and securing robust claims should be a priority to mitigate patent validity risks.

Conclusion

AU2023201826 presents a strategically significant patent application in Australia’s pharmaceutical sector, aiming to carve out protection for a novel therapeutic compound, formulation, or method. The scope, as defined by its claims, appears to balance breadth and specificity, critical for defending patent rights amid a competitive landscape populated with similar innovations.

To maximize its value, ongoing monitoring of related patent filings and rigorous enforcement strategies will be essential. The patent landscape suggests opportunities for differentiation based on inventive features, particularly in the areas of specialized formulations or therapeutic applications.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims likely cover a chemical compound, formulation, and therapeutic use, with scope designed to prevent imitators.
  • Strategic claim drafting is crucial to balance broad protection with defendability against prior art.
  • Australia’s patent landscape favors innovations that demonstrate genuine novelty and inventive step, especially within chemical and pharmaceutical realms.
  • Effective international patent filing (e.g., via PCT) can harmonize protection across markets, enhancing global competitiveness.
  • Continuous patent landscape analysis is essential to identify potential infringers and refine patent strategies over time.

FAQs

1. What is the typical length of patent protection for pharmaceuticals in Australia?
Pharmaceutical patents generally last for 20 years from the filing date, provided that annual renewal fees are paid. This period encourages innovation while enabling market exclusivity.

2. Can existing drugs be patented again in Australia?
New uses, formulations, or delivery mechanisms of existing drugs can be patented if they meet novelty and inventive step requirements, often through use or formulation claims.

3. How does Australian patent law treat combination therapies?
Claims covering combination therapies are permissible if the combination is novel, non-obvious, and provides an unexpected advantage over individual components.

4. What strategies can enhance patent strength against prior art?
Specifically defining claim scope, including detailed embodiments, and providing supportive data demonstrating unexpected benefits bolster patent validity against challenges.

5. How important is international patent protection for pharmaceutical companies?
Quite crucial. Due to the global nature of drug development and commercialization, worldwide patent protection (via PCT or direct filings) secures market exclusivity and enhances licensing opportunities.


Sources:
[1] IP Australia. (2023). Guide to Patentability and Patent Law.
[2] WHO. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceuticals.
[3] Australian Patent Act (1990).
[4] Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies. (2021). Harvard Business Review.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.