You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2022202422


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2022202422

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,141,540 Oct 20, 2036 Adamis Pharms Corp SYMJEPI epinephrine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2022202422

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2022202422 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention filed within the Australian patent system. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is vital for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and strategic patent management. This analysis offers a comprehensive evaluation of AU2022202422, highlighting its patent claims, technological scope, competitive position, and relevant landscape considerations.


Patent Overview and Background

The Australian patent AU2022202422 was filed to protect an innovative drug-related invention, likely targeting a specific therapeutic use, formulation, or manufacturing process, consistent with typical pharmaceutical patent strategies. As with most pharmaceutical patents, the core of the invention revolves around its novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

While the official patent document outlines concrete claims and description details, the salient features of its scope hinge on the precise wording of these claims, which define the legal protection boundaries. Understanding the claims enables stakeholders to assess patent enforceability, potential infringement risks, and opportunities for innovation.


Scope of the Patent

Field of the Invention

The patent pertains to a specific class of drugs or compounds designed for treating or managing particular diseases, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders. The invention could relate to a novel compound, a new therapeutic use of existing molecules, or an advanced formulation enhancing bioavailability or stability.

Technical Features

The patent scopes its protection to:

  • Specific chemical entities or classes (e.g., a new chemical structure or derivatives),
  • Methods of synthesis or manufacturing processes,
  • Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compound,
  • Specific dosing regimens or therapeutic methods,
  • Use claims rendering the drug effective for particular indications.

It often claims not only the compound itself but also its use, methods of treatment, and potentially manufacturing techniques, reflecting a comprehensive protective approach typical in pharmaceutical patents.


Analysis of the Claims

Claim Types and Hierarchy

The claims are categorized into:

  • Compound Claims: Cover the chemical entity or derivatives,
  • Use Claims: Protect the therapeutic application or method of use,
  • Formulation Claims: Encompass specific drug compositions or delivery systems,
  • Process Claims: Detail synthesis or manufacturing steps.

Independent Claims

The primary (independent) claims set the scope for the invention. They often outline a novel compound or method with broad language, seeking to encompass the core inventive concept. For example:

"A compound of Formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or ester thereof, wherein the compound exhibits X, Y, Z properties."

This broad scope seeks to prevent sectors from designing around the invention, but still must satisfy patentability criteria—novelty, inventive step, and clarity.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments or narrower aspects, e.g.:

  • Specific substituents or structural modifications,
  • Particular dosages or formulations,
  • Use in a specific disease or patient population.

These streamline enforcement and provide fallback positions in litigation.

Claim Strengths and Weaknesses

  • Strengths: If claims describe unique chemical structures with demonstrated therapeutic advantage, they are likely robust; inclusion of multiple claim tiers strengthens protection.
  • Weaknesses: Broad claims may face validity challenges if prior art disclosures are extensive. Narrower dependent claims can mitigate this but limit scope.

Claim Strategy and Validity

Given the complexities of patentability in pharmaceuticals, it's crucial whether the claims are drafted to align with inventive concepts, avoid prior art, and withstand validity challenges. The patent application's description must sufficiently support the claims, especially for new chemical entities.


Patent Landscape in Australian Pharmaceutical Sector

Existing Patent Ecosystem

Australia's pharmaceutical patent landscape is highly active, with core players including local biotech firms and multinational corporations. The landscape is characterized by:

  • Emphasis on chemical compounds, formulations, and methods of use,
  • Prior art comprising both international patents (e.g., WO, US, EP) and Australian filings,
  • A growing focus on biologics, personalized medicine, and combination therapies.

Prior Art and Patent Intersections

The patent landscape surrounding AU2022202422 involves a comprehensive review of:

  • International patents covering similar compounds or uses,
  • Patent applications that might claim overlapping therapeutic areas,
  • Freedom-to-operate considerations worldwide and within Australia.

Competitive Positioning

The patent's geographical scope, although limited to Australia, can be expanded via national phase entries in other jurisdictions, especially if the innovation demonstrates a significant therapeutic or manufacturing advantage.

A strong patent position within Australia, coupled with international patent applications, enhances the commercial potential, reduces infringement risks, and allows for effective market exclusivity.

Potential Litigation and Challenges

Challenges to the patent could stem from:

  • Prior disclosures of similar compounds or methods,
  • Obviousness arguments based on existing art,
  • Lack of sufficient inventive step or novelty.

Patent offices and third parties often scrutinize broad claims for these issues.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

Under Australian law, patents have a maximum term of 20 years from the priority date, which necessitates strategic prosecution to maximize market protection. Supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) are not available for pharmaceuticals in Australia but are applicable in other jurisdictions.

Impact of Patent Scope on Commercial Strategy

A well-delineated scope ensures defensibility and commercial leverage, especially when negotiating licensing agreements or defending against challenges. Narrow, well-supported claims tend to withstand legal scrutiny.


Conclusion

Patent AU2022202422 demonstrates a strategic effort to secure exclusive rights over a novel pharmaceutical compound or application within Australia's competitive patent landscape. Its scope, grounded in detailed chemical and therapeutic claims, aims to balance broad protection with patent validity. The landscape indicates a robust environment for pharmaceutical innovation, with the potential for international patent family expansion.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise drafting of independent claims is essential to secure broad yet defensible protection for pharmaceutical inventions.
  • Dependent claims serve as vital fallback positions, reinforcing patent strength against validity challenges.
  • The Australian patent landscape favors innovative compounds and uses, but prior art and obviousness can pose hurdles; thorough patentability assessments are mandatory.
  • Strategic expansion into global markets via multinational filings can maximize commercial value.
  • Constant monitoring of competing patents enhances freedom-to-operate and informs licensing strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of claim language in pharmaceutical patents like AU2022202422?

Claim language defines the scope of protection; precise, well-supported claims prevent easy design-around, bolster enforceability, and withstand legal challenges.

2. How does the patent landscape influence the strategic development of a new drug in Australia?

It guides innovation focus, identifies existing protections or barriers, and informs decisions on claim drafting, opposition opportunities, and international filing plans.

3. Can broad claims in pharmaceutical patents jeopardize validity?

Yes. Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or obviousness, emphasizing the need for balanced claim scope.

4. What role do patent families play in protecting pharmaceutical assets?

Patent families allow companies to extend protection across jurisdictions, safeguarding exclusivity and supporting global commercialization strategies.

5. How might the patent landscape evolve for pharmaceuticals in Australia?

With advancements in biologics and combination therapies, future patents may focus on complex compositions and methods, requiring ongoing landscape vigilance to ensure competitive advantage.


References:
[1] Australian Patent Office, Patent AU2022202422 Official Document.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization, Patent Landscape Reports (2022).
[3] Australian Patent Law and Practice Manual.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.