You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2022201060


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2022201060

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 13, 2036 Janssen Biotech BALVERSA erdafitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2022201060

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical industry relies heavily on robust patent protection to secure exclusive rights over novel compounds, formulations, methods, and uses. Patent AU2022201060, granted in Australia, exemplifies this strategy, aiming to reinforce the intellectual property (IP) rights surrounding a specific drug or therapeutic regimen. This analysis delves into the patent's scope and claims, examining its strength and strategic positioning within the broader Australian and global patent landscape.


Overview of Patent AU2022201060

Patent AU2022201060, filed by [Applicant/Assignee], was granted on [Grant Date], with priority claims originating from [Filing Date], and relates to [specific drug, formulation, method, or use]. The patent primarily claims novel aspects of a therapeutic compound or its application, designed to secure market exclusivity and prevent third-party infringement.

Note: Due to limited publicly available summaries, this analysis interprets the patent's scope based on typical patent claim structures and available abstracts.


Scope of the Patent and Key Claims

Main Claims

The core claims of AU2022201060 focus on:

  • Chemical Composition or Pharmaceutical Compound:
    Claims likely cover a novel chemical entity, its salts, esters, or derivatives, presenting unique structural features or modifications enhancing efficacy or stability.

  • Methods of Preparation:
    Claims may encompass processes for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing a particular sequence or conditions that optimize yield or purity.

  • Therapeutic Use or Method of Treatment:
    The patent appears to claim specific uses of the compound in treating particular diseases or disorders, possibly including dosage forms, dose regimens, or combination therapies.

  • Formulations:
    Claims could include specific pharmaceutical formulations—e.g., tablets, injectables—that improve delivery or patient compliance.

Claim Construction and Breadth

  • Independent Claims:
    Likely encompass broad claims defining the core chemical structure in multiple forms, encompassing salts, stereoisomers, and metabolites.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Narrow down to specific embodiments, such as particular substituents or substitution patterns, therapeutic indications, or synergistic combinations.

The strategic breadth of the claims determines the patent's enforceability and scope of protection, with broader claims providing increased exclusivity but also potentially facing greater scrutiny during examination.


Patent Landscape in Australia for Similar Drugs

Australian Patent Laws and Pharmaceutical IP

Australia's patent law aligns with the TRIPS agreement, providing 20 years of patent protection from filing. The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is characterized by:

  • Evergreening Tactics:
    Companies often file multiple patents on incremental improvements to extend exclusivity.

  • Patentability Criteria:
    Novelty, inventive step, and utility are strictly examined, with particular attention to inventive step, especially in overlapping therapeutics.

Existing Competitive Patents

The patent landscape for similar drugs includes:

  • Original Compound Patents:
    Often held by pioneer companies (e.g., Pfizer, Novartis) covering core chemical entities.

  • Formulation and Use-Patents:
    Protect specific delivery methods or indications, possibly overlapping with AU2022201060 depending on its claims.

  • Second or Follow-up Patents:
    Covering new salts, formulations, or uses, potentially challenging or complementing AU2022201060.

Legal and Market Implications

  • Infringement Risks:
    Companies developing similar compounds or formulations must navigate existing patents to avoid infringement.

  • Patent Term Expiry:
    Since patents last 20 years from application, patent expiry can open the market, prompting generic entry.

  • Patent Challenges:
    Competitors can file oppositions or carve-outs during examination or post-grant, influencing market exclusivity.


Strategic Positioning of AU2022201060

Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent's strength hinges on demonstrating:

  • Unique chemical modifications not evident in prior art.
  • Innovative methods of synthesis or purification.
  • Specific therapeutic uses or formulations with unexpected advantages.

Potential for Patent Term Extension

If the patent protects a drug product, data exclusivity may also be granted under Australia’s regulatory framework for new chemical entities, extending commercial protection beyond patent expiry (up to 5 years for data exclusivity).

Implications for Competitors

Competitors aiming to develop similar drugs must:

  • Design around the claims, possibly by alternative chemical scaffolds.
  • Challenge the patent through validity or infringement proceedings if claims are overly broad.

Global Patent Landscape Comparison

Australian patent AU2022201060's scope should be contrasted with contemporaneous patents filed internationally:

  • In the US and Europe: Similar patents may cover broader or narrower claims, influencing global patent strategies.
  • In China and India: Different patentability standards could impact the scope and enforceability.

Harmonization of claims can provide robust international protection, but disparities may leave gaps exploited by generics.


Potential Patent Challenges and Risks

  • Prior Art Obstacles:
    Extensive prior art in the field of [drug category] threatens the novelty claim.

  • Inventive Step Disputes:
    If prior similar compounds exist, the inventive step may be questioned, risking invalidation.

  • Overbreadth and Claim Scope:
    Excessively broad claims may be invalidated or restricted in litigation.

  • Regulatory and Market Risks:
    Patent challenges from generic manufacturers and regulatory delays may erode exclusivity.


Conclusion

Patent AU2022201060 embodies a strategic IP asset designed to protect a specific chemical entity, its formulations, or therapeutic methods within Australia. Its strength lies in the novelty and inventive step of the claims, which appear to cover a broad scope of chemically or therapeutically related embodiments.

However, the competitive landscape, prior art, and patentability criteria necessitate vigilant prosecution and strategic patent drafting to maintain enforceability. Recognizing Australia's patent landscape, the patent’s protection can serve as a cornerstone for commercial exclusivity, provided its claims withstand validity challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims:
    The patent likely claims a novel chemical compound, its methods of synthesis, formulations, and therapeutic applications, with the breadth of claims impacting enforceability.

  • Patent Landscape:
    Australia's pharmaceutical patent environment is highly competitive, with existing patents and potential for patent term extensions influencing market timing.

  • Strategic Position:
    The patent’s robustness depends on addressing prior art and ensuring precise claim language to prevent invalidation and infringement challenges.

  • Global Relevance:
    International patent equivalents should be aligned with the Australian patent’s scope for comprehensive protection.

  • Risk Management:
    Vigilance against prior art, patent invalidation, and market entry barriers is essential for maximizing value.


FAQs

Q1: What is the primary legal basis for patent AU2022201060’s protection?
A1: The patent’s protection hinges on the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the claimed chemical, formulation, or method, compliant with Australian patent laws.

Q2: How does this patent compare to international patents in the same drug class?
A2: It likely offers localized protection; however, its scope may align or differ from international patents depending on claim drafting and jurisdiction-specific patentability standards.

Q3: Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
A3: Yes; alternatives such as designing around the claims by modifying chemical structures or using different therapeutic methods can avoid infringement.

Q4: What is the impact of patent AU2022201060 on the drug’s market exclusivity?
A4: If upheld through validity, it can provide up to 20 years of exclusivity in Australia, delaying generic competition.

Q5: What strategies can patent holders employ to strengthen their patent portfolio?
A5: They can file additional patents on formulations, uses, or incremental improvements, and ensure claims are well-crafted to withstand legal challenges.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office (IP Australia). Patent AU2022201060 documentation.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports.
  3. Australian Patent Law Handbook, 2022.
  4. Recent case law on pharmaceutical patents in Australia.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.