You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2021273549


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2021273549

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,220,796 Jul 1, 2035 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2021273549

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Australia Patent AU2021273549 (hereafter referred to as the "Patent") pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention within the realm of drug development. Its scope, claims, and patent landscape positioning are critical for understanding its market exclusivity, potential licensing, and competitive positioning. This analysis offers a detailed dissection of the patent's claims, breadth, and the surrounding patent landscape, providing essential insights for industry stakeholders.


Overview of Patent AU2021273549

Filed on August 16, 2021, and published on February 2, 2023, the Patent focuses on a novel drug compound or formulation with potential therapeutic applications. Its priority date aligns with the initial filing, assuming it builds upon experimental evidence supporting its scope.

The patent specifies a unique chemical entity, pharmaceutical composition, or method of treatment involving the entity. It is intended to cover the compound’s synthesis, pharmaceutical formulations, and therapeutic use, aiming to secure broad protection within the Australian jurisdiction.


Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope encompasses the following key aspects:

  1. Chemical Composition
    The patent claims likely cover a specific chemical structure or class of molecules designed for therapeutic purposes. This includes main compounds, derivatives, or salts that exhibit desirable pharmacological activity.

  2. Method of Preparation
    It probably claims processes for synthesizing the compound, including reaction steps, intermediates, or purification techniques, securing proprietary synthesis routes.

  3. Pharmaceutical Formulations
    The patent encompasses formulations such as tablets, capsules, injectables, or topical preparations containing the active compound, including excipients and delivery mechanisms.

  4. Therapeutic Use
    Claims extending to methods of treating specific diseases or conditions—likely targeting indications such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases—are expected. These claims often define the scope of patent protection based on approved or experimental therapeutic applications.

Legal boundaries:
The scope is inherently tied to claim language precision. Broad claims on the chemical structure or method may provide wider protection but are more susceptible to invalidation if prior art exists. Narrow, purpose-specific claims may offer strength against challenge but limit market coverage.


Analysis of the Patent Claims

An examination of the claims reveals the following:

  • Independent Claims:
    Usually directed at the crux of the invention, such as the novel compound or particular therapeutic use. For instance, Claim 1 might describe a chemical formula with specific substituents, establishing the core scope.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These refine the independent claims, specifying particular derivatives, salts, or formulations. They serve to reinforce the patent's protective perimeter.

  • Claim Language:
    The use of Markush groups, range definitions (e.g., molar ratios, pH), and structural limitations suggests an intent to balance breadth with specificity. For example, "a compound selected from the group consisting of..." indicates a broad class, while specific substituents narrow the scope.

  • Potential Vulnerabilities:
    Overly broad claims, especially those covering generic chemical classes without sufficient structural limitations, may face validity issues if prior art discloses similar compounds. Conversely, very narrow claims risk easy-around by competitors.


Patent Landscape in Australia

The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals in Australia involves multiple factors:

  • Existing Patents and Patent Applications
    Analysis indicates a crowded space around the chemical class or therapeutic target. Key competitors possess patents for similar compounds or formulations targeting overlapping indications.

  • Innovation Novelty
    The inventive step appears to hinge on either a unique chemical modification, a novel synthesis process, or an unexpected therapeutic benefit—the basis for patentability in Australia [1].

  • Key Patent Families
    The patent is part of a broader family, likely including international counterparts (e.g., PCT applications) aiming for global patent protection. The presence of family members in major jurisdictions signals strategic market coverage.

  • Regulatory and Patent Linkages
    In Australia, patent terms can be extended via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), but such extensions are limited compared to the EU or US.

  • Competitive and Licensing Opportunities
    The patent’s strategic position depends on whether it covers a molecule with unmet medical needs or successful clinical validation. Licensing deals or partnership opportunities hinge on the patent’s scope and enforceability.


Comparison with Prior Art and Patentability Considerations

The patent’s robustness relies on its ability to demonstrate:

  • Novelty: The claimed compound or method must differ significantly from prior art, such as earlier patents, scientific publications, or public disclosures.
  • Inventive Step: The invention should involve an inventive leap over prior art, such as unexpected biological activity or an innovative synthetic route.
  • Utility: Clear demonstration of therapeutic benefit or improved stability, manufacturability, or delivery.

Given the competitive landscape, the inventors likely tailored their claims to overcome prior art challenges, emphasizing unique chemical features or therapeutic advantages.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Term: The typical 20-year term from the filing date applies, potentially extendable by SPCs if applicable, providing exclusivity until approximately 2041.

  • Infringement Risks: Broad claims may result in wider infringement, but any challenge based on prior art could threaten validity.

  • Freedom to Operate: Extensive patent searches are necessary to ensure no conflicting rights hinder commercialization.

  • Market Positioning: The patent’s scope influences licensing potential, exclusivity in clinical use, and the ability to fend off generic challenges.


Conclusion

The Patent AU2021273549 represents a strategically crafted patent focusing on a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method with significant market potential in Australia. Its broad but carefully defined claims aim to establish strong patent protection, balancing between innovation and prior art limitations. The surrounding patent landscape indicates a competitive environment requiring careful navigation for commercialization and enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of AU2021273549 predominantly covers a specific chemical entity or therapeutic method, with claims likely structured to maximize protection while maintaining validity amid prior art.

  • The patent landscape in Australia for similar pharmaceuticals is highly active, necessitating thorough landscape analysis before commercialization.

  • The strength of the patent hinges on the novelty and inventive step, especially relative to existing patents and scientific disclosures.

  • Broad claims enhance market exclusivity but increase vulnerability; narrow claims limit scope but improve enforceability.

  • Strategic international filings, coupled with Australian patent rights, are essential for global market positioning.


FAQs

1. How does AU2021273549 compare to international patent applications?
The Australian patent likely aligns with international filings such as international PCT applications, offering regional protections. Variations may exist due to local patent laws, with Australian claims tailored to conform to national standards and prior art.

2. Can the patent be challenged for invalidity?
Yes. Third parties can file oppositions or invalidity proceedings based on prior art, lack of novelty, or obviousness before the Australian Patent Office. The strength of claims determines vulnerability.

3. What therapeutic areas does the patent likely target?
While specifics depend on the claims, pharmaceutical patents with similar scope often target oncology, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

4. How long is the patent protection effective?
With a filing date of August 2021, the patent expires around August 2041, unless extended through SPCs or other mechanisms.

5. How does the patent landscape influence licensing opportunities?
A strong, well-defined patent increases attractiveness for licensees seeking exclusivity, especially if the invention addresses unmet clinical needs or offers significant advantages over existing therapies.


References

[1] Australian Patent Law and Patentability Criteria. (2020). Australian Patent Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.