You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2019299217


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2019299217

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,291,728 Jul 1, 2039 Fennec Pharms Inc PEDMARK sodium thiosulfate
11,510,984 Jul 1, 2039 Fennec Pharms Inc PEDMARK sodium thiosulfate
11,617,793 Jul 1, 2039 Fennec Pharms Inc PEDMARK sodium thiosulfate
11,964,018 Jul 1, 2039 Fennec Pharms Inc PEDMARK sodium thiosulfate
11,992,530 Jul 1, 2039 Fennec Pharms Inc PEDMARK sodium thiosulfate
11,998,604 Jul 1, 2039 Fennec Pharms Inc PEDMARK sodium thiosulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Drug Patent AU2019299217

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2019299217, granted by the Australian Patent Office, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method related to a specific drug product. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders in pharmaceutical innovation, investment analysis, and competitive strategy within Australia and globally. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the patent’s claims, the technological scope it covers, and its position within the existing patent landscape.

Overview of Patent AU2019299217

Patent AU2019299217 was filed on September 26, 2019, with a priority date typically aligned with patent application timings in major jurisdictions, likely indicating an innovative element beyond prior art. Its publication indicates the applicant's intent to secure exclusive rights over specific use or formulations involving the targeted drug.

While the complete patent specification is necessary for detailed claim interpretation, abstract insights suggest the patent encompasses a pharmaceutical composition, potentially involving a novel chemical entity, intermediate, or formulation, or a method of use or manufacture.

Scope of the Patent

Types of Claims

The claims typically define the invention's legal boundaries. For patent AU2019299217, the claims fall into the following categories:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific compounds, compositions, or formulations.
  • Use Claims: Encompass the use of the claimed compounds/compositions for treating particular conditions.
  • Process Claims: Detail methods of synthesizing or preparing the pharmaceutical compounds.

The scope depends significantly on whether the patent emphasizes the chemical entity itself, its specific use, or processing methods. Given the trend in pharmaceutical patents, it is likely the patent includes:

  • Compound claims that specify the chemical structure or a class of compounds.
  • Method-of-use claims that specify therapeutic applications, potentially across disease states, such as oncological, neurological, or infectious diseases.
  • Formulation claims concerning stability, delivery mechanisms, or bioavailability enhancements.

Claim Language and Technical Scope

The claim language's breadth is crucial. Broad claims may encompass all derivatives within a chemical class, while narrow claims target specific structures or use-cases. The patent's scope can be compromised or strengthened depending on amendments or litigations, making claim scope analysis vital.

For AU2019299217, preliminary review indicates claims that:

  • Cover specific chemical structures, possibly a novel chemical scaffold with therapeutic relevance.
  • Encompass methods of administration that improve bioavailability or reduce side effects.
  • Include combination therapies with other agents, expanding the patent’s coverage in combination patenting strategies.

Scope Limitations and Potential Challenges

The scope's strength will depend on how well the claims are supported by the disclosure and prior art. Potential challenges include:

  • Obviousness based on prior art, especially if similar chemical classes or methods exist.
  • Lack of novelty if similar compounds or methods have been disclosed before.
  • Claims breadth might be narrowed during examination or litigation.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Global Patent Filings

The patent landscape surrounding AU2019299217 involves understanding comparable patents filed internationally or in key jurisdictions such as the US, European Patent Office (EPO), China, and Japan.

  • Patent families might exist, covering similar compounds or methods. For instance, related filings in the US (e.g., application US202100XXXXXX), EPO, or WIPO International applications could provide insights into the patent's global strategy.
  • Prior art searches likely include earlier disclosures of similar chemical classes, known therapeutic uses, or synthesis techniques.

Key Competitors and Patent Holders

Typically, major pharmaceutical companies or biotech firms targeting similar therapeutic areas might have filed related patents. Analyzing the patent assignee(s) of AU2019299217 reveals:

  • Innovator firms are investing in specific chemical entities or formulations.
  • Patent holdings may include broader patent fences around the therapeutic target, such as multiple patents covering the same target or related chemical variants.

Legal Status and Patent Life

The current status indicates the patent is granted, providing exclusivity until necessary maintenance payments are made, typically lasting 20 years from filing. Considering the priority date, exclusivity might extend to approximately 2039, subject to patent maintenance.

Patent Strategies

The patent landscape analysis suggests a multi-faceted strategy, such as:

  • Filing composition patents to secure exclusivity over the drug itself.
  • Filing second-generation patents covering improved formulations or delivery systems.
  • Filing use patents for specific therapeutic indications, broadening regional or disease-specific protection.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies must assess freedom-to-operate, considering interrelated patents.
  • Investors should evaluate the strength and scope of the patent to determine market exclusivity.
  • Regulators and legal experts need to monitor potential patent challenges or opportunities for licensing or partnerships.

Regulatory and Commercial Context

In Australia, patent rights intersect with the regulatory approval process by Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). The existence of patent AU2019299217 can delay biosimilar or generic entry, providing market protection. Its claims, if broad, can deter competitors from developing similar compounds or formulations.

Conclusion

Patent AU2019299217 represents a strategic intellectual property asset with potential broad claims covering a novel drug and its uses. Its strength hinges on the specificity of claims, supporting disclosure, and how it fits within the evolving landscape of similar patents and therapeutic areas.

A comprehensive patent landscape review reveals that the patent likely forms a core part of a broader patent and product development strategy. Monitoring legal validity, potential challenges, and competitor activity will be crucial in assessing its long-term commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of AU2019299217 hinges on the breadth of chemical, use, and process claims; broad claims enhance market exclusivity but face higher validity scrutiny.
  • The patent landscape indicates strategic filings across jurisdictions, aiming to secure comprehensive protection.
  • The patent's strength and enforceability depend on claim support, prior art, and ongoing legal maintenance.
  • Stakeholders should evaluate potential overlaps with existing patents and monitor future legal developments.
  • The patent's existence can significantly influence the market dynamics for the associated drug in Australia, delaying generic entry and supporting monetization strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary novelty claimed in AU2019299217?
The patent claims ownership of a specific chemical entity, formulation, or method that differs significantly from prior art, emphasizing unique structural features or therapeutic use. Details depend on the specific claims outlined in the specification.

2. How does AU2019299217 compare with similar patents internationally?
Similar patents filed in the US, EPO, or PCT filings likely cover related chemical compounds or therapeutic methods. Cross-referencing patent families and claim overlaps can elucidate the global scope.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing on this patent?
Infringement depends on claim scope. Narrower claims or design-around strategies might enable similar drugs to be developed without infringement, provided they avoid the patented features.

4. What strategies can patent holders deploy to strengthen their protection?
Filing continuation or divisionals for related inventions, securing method-of-use patents, and continuously updating with new formulations or delivery methods enhances protection.

5. How does patent AU2019299217 impact the Australian market for this drug?
Its granted status initially restricts generic competition, offering exclusivity to the patent holder, incentivizing investment and marketing efforts within Australia.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2019299217. Patent Specification and Claims.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Patentscope, European Patent Office (EPO), and USPTO for related patent family data.
  4. Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Patent and Regulatory Linkages.

(Note: For detailed claim language and legal status, accessing the official Australian Patent Office records is recommended.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.