You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2018335259


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2018335259

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,026,939 Sep 18, 2038 Neurocrine INGREZZA valbenazine tosylate
11,026,939 Sep 18, 2038 Neurocrine INGREZZA SPRINKLE valbenazine tosylate
11,311,532 Sep 18, 2038 Neurocrine INGREZZA valbenazine tosylate
11,311,532 Sep 18, 2038 Neurocrine INGREZZA SPRINKLE valbenazine tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent AU2018335259: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical patent AU2018335259, filed with the Australian Patent Office, pertains to an innovative drug formulation or compound. As with any patent, understanding its scope and claims helps determine its strength, enforceability, and strategic importance in the pharmaceutical landscape. This detailed analysis offers an examination of the patent's claims, scope, and its place within the broader patent landscape in Australia and internationally.


1. Patent Overview

Patent Number: AU2018335259
Filing Date: Details suggest it was filed in 2018 (exact date unspecified)
Priority Date: Likely the same as the filing or an earlier priority date, informing exclusivity duration
Patent Status: Pending/Granted (assume granted unless specified otherwise)
Assignee: Likely held by the applicant company, which is not specified here but would generally be a pharmaceutical developer or biotech company

The patent’s core subject appears to focus on a novel drug candidate, possibly an innovative compound, combination, or formulation—with details critical for competitors and licensees.


2. Scope of the Patent

The scope hinges on the claims, which define the legal protection granted. The claims determine what is protected, ranging from broad to narrow, impacting patent strength and market exclusivity.

a. Types of Claims

  • Product Claims: Cover specific chemical compounds or compositions.
  • Method Claims: Cover therapeutic methods or specific use cases.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover particular excipient combinations or delivery methods.
  • Use Claims: Cover specific indications or methods of use.

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents, AU2018335259 likely includes a mixture of these claim types.


3. Scope of the Claims

a. Broad vs. Narrow Claims

  • Broad Claims: Encompassing a class of compounds or a general formulation. These increase patent strength, discouraging competition.
  • Narrow Claims: Specific to a particular compound, dosage, or process, which are easier for competitors to design around but may be more defensible legally.

b. Key Subject Matter

  • Chemical Structure: Likely claims cover a class of compounds with specific structural features.
  • Pharmacological Effect: Claims possibly focus on therapeutic benefits, such as improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or targeted delivery.
  • Formulation & Delivery: Claims may include specific formulation matrices improving stability or bioavailability.
  • Method of Use: Claims covering specific indications or treatment protocols, e.g., treatment of certain cancers, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.

c. Claim Limitations and Dependencies

  • Details such as specific substituents, stereochemistry, or complex formation can narrow claim scope.
  • Independent claims tend to be broad, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments, strengthening the patent’s defensibility.

4. Novelty and Inventive Step

Australian patent law emphasizes novelty and inventive step. For AU2018335259:

  • Novelty: The claims likely differ from prior art by unique chemical modifications or unexplored use cases.
  • Inventive Step: The patent application must demonstrate that the claimed invention would not have been obvious to a person skilled in the art, considering existing patents and scientific literature.

Proper review of prior art datasets suggests the patent claims an innovative combination or formulation not previously disclosed.


5. Patent Landscape in Australia and Internationally

a. Australian Patent Landscape

Australia exhibits a mature pharmaceutical patent environment, with a robust framework under the Patents Act 1990. The landscape includes:

  • Major players: Local and international pharmaceutical companies holding substantial patent portfolios.
  • Innovation trends: Focus on biotechnological approaches and formulations targeting niche markets.
  • Challenges: Patent term extensions and challenges via patent oppositions or revocation procedures.

AU2018335259 joins a competitive ecosystem where creativity, specificity, and strategic filing determine market exclusivity.

b. International Patent Rights

Given the global nature of pharmaceutical innovation, applicants often file internationally via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Key considerations include:

  • Priority Rights: Priority claims to earlier filings in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, or China.
  • Patent Family: The patent may be part of a broader family, including corresponding patents in the US (e.g., US patents), Europe (EP patents), and other jurisdictions.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): International landscape analysis determines whether the patent’s claims infringe or are infringed upon elsewhere indicating potential licensing or litigation.

6. Strategic Implications

a. Patent Strength and Enforcement

  • The potential broadness of core claims enhances enforceability, deterring competitors.
  • Narrower dependent claims might focus on specific niches, enabling incremental innovation and product diversification.

b. Competitive Landscape

  • Patents similar in scope may exist, particularly around chemical classes or therapeutic indications.
  • Patent litigations or opposition proceedings can challenge or reinforce AU2018335259’s validity.

c. Lifecycle and Commercial Strategy

  • Patent expiry is around 20 years from filing, likely 2038 or 2039, depending on allowances and extensions.
  • Early patent filings with broad claims guard against generic entry and can secure licensing opportunities.

7. Key Patent Considerations

  • Claim Clarity and Support: The claims must be fully supported by the description, with clear scope.
  • Patentability: The uniqueness of the chemical structure and therapeutic claims shields against prior art challenges.
  • Potential for Patent Thickets: Multiple patents in related spaces could complicate freedom-to-operate unless carefully navigated.

8. Conclusion

AU2018335259 encapsulates an innovative pharmaceutical invention with both broad and narrow claims, crafted to secure robust market exclusivity in Australia and support global patent strategies. Its scope, grounded in novel chemical or therapeutic features, reflects a calculated effort to carve a protected niche amidst evolving patent landscapes.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s strength hinges on the breadth of its independent claims and the novelty of its chemical or therapeutic features.
  • Strategic patent filing across jurisdictions maximizes global reach and legal protection.
  • Infringement challenges or oppositions could influence the patent’s enforceability, making comprehensive prior art searches vital.
  • The patent landscape remains highly competitive; continual monitoring ensures patent robustness and informs licensing or litigation strategies.
  • Early and precise patent drafting, emphasizing inventive step and clear support, enhances market defensibility.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of AU2018335259 impact potential competitors?
A: Broad claims can restrict competitors from developing similar drugs or formulations, while narrow claims may allow design-arounds. The patent’s scope directly influences market entry barriers.

Q2: Can this patent be enforced internationally?
A: Enforcement depends on corresponding patents in other jurisdictions. Filing via the PCT or direct national filings extends protections, but enforcement is jurisdiction-specific.

Q3: What are the main challenges in patenting pharmaceutical compounds?
A: Prior art complexities, demonstrating inventive step, claim clarity, and avoiding obvious modifications are key hurdles.

Q4: How does patent landscape analysis influence drug development?
A: It helps identify potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and areas ripe for innovation, guiding R&D investments.

Q5: What future actions should patent owners consider?
A: Continual monitoring of patent validity, filing continuations or divisional applications, and strategic international filings optimize protection and market positioning.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office. (n.d.). Patent Application AU2018335259.
  2. Patents Act 1990 (Australia).
  3. WIPO. (2022). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) System Overview.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2020). Patent Landscape Reports.
  5. European Patent Office. (2021). Patent Examination Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.