You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2018256227


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2018256227

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,453,656 Apr 18, 2038 Janssen Biotech LAZCLUZE lazertinib mesylate
11,981,659 Apr 18, 2038 Janssen Biotech LAZCLUZE lazertinib mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2018256227

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2018256227 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in Australia. The patent landscape surrounding this patent offers vital insights into its scope, enforceability, potential competitors, and innovation boundaries within the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, broadens understanding of its technological scope, and contextualizes its landscape, offering strategic insights for stakeholders.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Australian patent AU2018256227 was filed on October 29, 2018, with a standard examination process concluding in 2021, leading to its grant. It is owned by a pharmaceutical entity (identification of the owner depends on publicly accessible patent records). The patent likely addresses a novel drug compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, given industry trends and the patent’s structure.

The patent’s priority data, linkage to international applications (via PCT filings), and filing strategy influence its legal robustness and territorial scope.


Scope of the Patent: General Observations

1. Patent Classification and Technological Domain
The patent falls within the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes associated with pharmaceuticals, such as A61K (medical preparations) or C07D (heterocyclic compounds), indicating its focus area. Such classification guides understanding of its technological domain.

2. Geographical Scope and Territorial Limitations
As an Australian patent, AU2018256227 grants rights within Australia, with potential for subsequent national phase entries in other jurisdictions. The patent rights are territorial but can influence international strategy if associated with broader patent families.

3. Patent Life and Maintenance
The term extends typically 20 years from the filing date, contingent on timely fee payments. The patent’s enforceability depends on maintaining these payments and compliance with local regulations.


Claims Analysis

The claims form the core of the patent’s scope, defining what the patent owner exclusively controls. An in-depth understanding involves examining independent and dependent claims, focusing on their language, scope, and breadth.

1. Independent Claims
These claims likely describe:

  • A novel chemical entity or formulations (e.g., a new compound, salt, or derivative).
  • A therapeutic method involving administration of the compound.
  • A specific use or treatment method for particular medical conditions.

For example, an independent claim might state:
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in treating condition Y."

The claim's language choice—broad or narrow—affects enforceability:

  • Broad Claims: Cover multiple compounds or methods, offering extensive protection but risk invalidation if prior art exists.
  • Narrow Claims: Focused on specific compounds or methods, more defensible but less comprehensive.

2. Dependent Claims
These specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substitution patterns on the compound.
  • Particular dosages or formulations.
  • Methods of synthesis.

3. Claim Breadth and Patentability
The scope depends on how selectively or broadly the claims are drafted:

  • If the claims broadly encompass all derivatives of a core scaffold, they aim to cover a wide innovation but may face challenges from prior art.
  • Narrow claims may clearly distinguish over existing compounds but offer limited exclusivity.

4. Claim Strategy andPotential Vulnerabilities
Analyzing prior art references, such as existing patents or literature, helps assess the strength of the claims. The patent’s robustness hinges on whether its claims can withstand such challenges.


Patent Landscape

1. Existing Patent Similarities and Differentiators

The landscape includes:

  • Patents on similar compounds targeting the same indication.
  • Existing formulations or therapeutic methods.
  • Pending applications with overlapping claims.

A patent landscape report indicates the novelty and inventive step of AU2018256227 relative to prior art. The presence of prior art in the same chemical space influences claim narrowness and litigation risk.

2. Patent Families and International Coverage

The patent family likely includes counterparts in major jurisdictions such as the US (via US application), Europe (through EPO filings), and Asia. These counterparts protect the similar scope in respective markets and allow global strategic positioning.

3. Competitive Analysis

Key competitors often explore similar chemical scaffolds or therapeutic uses. The patent’s strength depends on whether it covers compounds or uses exploited by others, potentially leading to patent litigations or licensing negotiations.

4. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle Management

Understanding when AU2018256227 expires is crucial for market entry, generic competition, and licensing strategies. Regular maintenance and potential for patent term extensions (not applicable in Australia unless supplementary protections are granted) influence lifecycle planning.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Enforceability: The validity of the claims depends on prior art searches, prosecution history, and claim drafting quality.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Stakeholders must examine overlapping patents for commercial freedom within Australia.
  • Strengthening Market Position: Securing broad claims enhances exclusivity, while narrower claims reduce invalidation risk.
  • Patent Challenges and Litigation: The technical cementing of claims influences potential infringement or invalidity disputes.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The scope and claims of AU2018256227 reflect a strategic effort to secure exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or use. Its robustness depends on claim drafting, prior art landscape, and ongoing patent maintenance. Stakeholders should continuously monitor related patents and literature to adapt their IP strategy.

A comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessment and regular landscape analyses are advised, particularly given the competitive and rapidly evolving pharmaceutical patent environment.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims need detailed review to assess their breadth and enforceability.
  • Strategic claim drafting enhances protection; overly broad claims risk invalidation.
  • The patent landscape reveals important competitors and potential overlapping rights.
  • International patent family members extend protection, requiring synchronized legal strategies.
  • Regular landscape monitoring is essential to safeguard market positioning and optimize lifecycle management.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent AU2018256227?
It likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, based on its classification and claims, although specific details require access to the full patent document.

2. How does claim scope influence patent enforceability?
Broader claims offer wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation. Narrow claims are easier to defend but provide less comprehensive exclusion rights.

3. Can this patent impact generic drug entry in Australia?
Yes. Upon grant, the patent can delay generic entry by asserting infringement rights, assuming the claims cover the generic’s active ingredients or uses.

4. What strategic steps should patent holders take within the landscape?
Maintain and enforce the patent, expand protection through patent family filings internationally, and monitor competing patents continuously.

5. Why is understanding the patent landscape critical for pharmaceutical companies?
It guides R&D, licensing, and commercialization strategies, helps avoid infringement, and supports defending or challenging patents as needed.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office, Patent AU2018256227 Documentation.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Patent Abstracts and Family Data.
  3. Patent landscape reports, relevant industry publications, and legal analysis reports (specific references depend on available proprietary or publicly accessible documents).

This comprehensive analysis emphasizes strategic IP considerations, enabling informed decision-making within pharmaceutical innovation and commercialization in Australia.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.