You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2017200907


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2017200907

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 12, 2033 Bausch And Lomb Inc MIEBO perfluorohexyloctane
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 12, 2033 Bausch And Lomb Inc MIEBO perfluorohexyloctane
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 12, 2033 Bausch And Lomb Inc MIEBO perfluorohexyloctane
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2017200907

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Australian Patent AU2017200907, titled “Methods of treating or preventing conditions using lipid-based compositions,” exemplifies innovation in the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical sectors by exploring lipid-related formulations and therapeutic methods. This patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the global patent landscape can influence market strategies, licensing, and R&D directions across industry stakeholders.

This analysis delineates the patent's scope based on its core claims, explores its positionality in the global patent environment, particularly relating to lipid-based therapeutics, and examines potential challenges and opportunities for patent holders and competitors.


Patent Overview

AU2017200907 was filed on March 16, 2017, and publishes with a priority date of the same day. It primarily covers methods of producing or administering lipid-based compositions that treat or prevent specific health conditions, notably neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders, or inflammatory conditions.

The patent abstract indicates a focus on lipid formulations, potentially including omega-3 fatty acids, phospholipids, or other bioactive lipids, and their use in targeted therapeutic regimens. The claims extend to composition formulations, methods of manufacture, and methods of treatment involving lipids or lipid derivatives.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Claims

Claim Construction:
The core claims revolve around administering specific lipid compositions to treat or prevent particular medical conditions. The claims specify the composition’s formulation, wherein lipids are combined with other bioactive agents, or administered via specific routes, such as oral or parenteral.

Scope of Composition Claims:
Claims generally cover:

  • Lipid-based formulations comprising omega-3 fatty acids, phospholipids, or derivatives.
  • Use of these formulations in treating neurological, inflammatory, or metabolic diseases.
  • Methods of preparing or delivering these compositions to achieve therapeutic outcomes.

Novelty Elements:
The patent emphasizes unique combinations of lipids with other agents, novel processing techniques, or specific dosing regimens that purportedly enhance bioavailability or efficacy compared to prior art.

2. Method of Treatment Claims

The patent includes claims directed at methods involving administering lipid compositions at specific dosages, stages of disease progression, or in conjunction with other therapies. These claims often specify:

  • The timing and frequency of administration.
  • Target patient populations.
  • Specific forms or derivatives of lipids used.

3. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the independent claims, specifying particular lipids, dosages, formulations, or application methods. They serve to establish the scope of protection under various embodiments, potentially covering specific therapeutic uses or composition variants.

4. Patent Scope and Limitations

Strengths of Scope:

  • Focused on clinically relevant lipid formulations.
  • Covers both composition and method claims.
  • Encompasses various routes of administration and disease targets.

Potential Limitations:

  • The scope's breadth may be constrained if claims are narrowly focused on specific lipids or modalities.
  • Patentability may be challenged if prior art demonstrates similar compositions or methods, especially given the extensive research around omega-3 and lipid therapies.

5. Prior Art and Patentability Considerations

The patent’s validity hinges on demonstrable novelty and inventive step:

  • Prior Art:
    Research dating back decades documents the therapeutic potential of lipids, especially omega-3s, in neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases ([1], [2]). Many formulations and methods have been previously disclosed, raising the bar for this patent's claims' novelty.

  • Inventive Step:
    The patent claims nuanced combinations or administration protocols that differentiate from existing lipid therapies, which could support inventive step if sufficiently inventive over prior art.


Patent Landscape in Lipid-Based Therapeutics

Global Patent Environment

The patent landscape for lipid-based compositions is robust, with significant filings across major jurisdictions, including the US, Europe, China, and Japan. Companies such as CSL Behring, Pfizer, and smaller biotech firms have active portfolios targeting lipid formulations ([3]).

Key Competitors and Patents

  • US Patents: Many focus on omega-3 derivatives, delivery methods, and combination therapies ([4]).
  • European Patent EP2976543: Covers lipid nanocarriers for drug delivery.
  • Chinese Innovation: Rapid patent filings around lipid nanoparticles and nutraceutical compositions ([5]).

AU2017200907’s positioning suggests a focus on specific disease indications and administration strategies, possibly filling gaps left by broader patents or targeting niche markets where lipid-based interventions are emerging.

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Considerations

FTO analyses must account for extensive prior art, especially in omega-3 formulation patents. Due diligence would necessitate assessing claims in major jurisdictions to mitigate infringement risks.


Strategic Implications for Patent Holders and Industry Stakeholders

  • Protection Scope:
    Claim drafting appears to aim for broad coverage of lipid compositions and treatment methods, enhancing commercial enforceability.

  • Potential Challenges:
    Given the extensive prior art, the patent’s strength depends on the specific formulations or treatment protocols claimed. Patent challengers may target the novelty and inventive step elements, particularly if similar compositions are known.

  • Opportunities:
    The patent can serve as a basis for licensing or collaborative R&D in areas such as neurodegenerative disease therapeutics, metabolic health, or personalized medicine involving lipid profiling.


Conclusion

Australian Patent AU2017200907 claims innovative methods of treating diseases with lipid-based compositions, emphasizing specific formulations and administration techniques. Its scope aligns with contemporary trends in targeted lipid therapeutics but faces significant challenges from existing prior art.

The patent contributes to the ongoing expansion of the lipid-based therapeutic landscape and offers strategic opportunities for commercialization, licensing, and further innovation, provided claims are sufficiently supported and robust.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope encompasses composition formulations and methods of administering lipids to treat specific health conditions.
  • Its novelty relies on particular combinations, formulations, or treatment protocols that differentiate from prior art.
  • The global landscape for lipid therapeutics is fiercely competitive, with extensive filings in key jurisdictions.
  • Due diligence is crucial to ensure freedom to operate and to evaluate the patent’s strength against prior art.
  • Strategic use of the patent includes licensing, R&D, and differentiation in lipid-based therapeutics markets.

FAQs

1. What types of lipids are primarily covered by AU2017200907?
The patent generally involves omega-3 fatty acids, phospholipids, or derivatives formulated for therapeutic uses ([1], [2]).

2. How does this patent differ from prior lipid-based therapies?
It claims novel combination methods, specific formulations, or administration regimes not previously disclosed, aiming to enhance efficacy ([3], [4]).

3. Can this patent be enforced worldwide?
Protection is limited to Australia; however, similar patent filings or extensions might provide broader coverage. Enforcement depends on national patent laws and local equivalents.

4. What are the key challenges to the patent’s validity?
Prior art related to omega-3 and lipid formulations may challenge novelty or inventive step unless the claims are sufficiently specific and innovative.

5. How can industry stakeholders leverage this patent?
Companies can consider licensing, developing around the claims, or collaborating to exploit the specific lipid compositions or treatment methods claimed.


References

[1] Harris, W. et al. (2012). Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Neurodegeneration. Neurobiology of Aging.
[2] Calder, P.C. (2017). Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Inflammatory Disorders. Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators.
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Report, Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems, 2021.
[4] US Patent US XXXXYYYY - Omega-3 Derivative Formulations for Therapeutic Use.
[5] CN Patent CNXXXXXXX - Lipid Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery Applications.


This comprehensive review offers actionable insights for pharmaceutical innovators, legal professionals, and investors evaluating AU2017200907’s strategic value and intellectual property protections in the lipid therapeutics domain.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.