You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2016211745


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2016211745

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,596,107 Dec 23, 2036 Bausch And Lomb Inc LOTEMAX SM loteprednol etabonate
11,534,395 Jan 26, 2036 Bausch And Lomb Inc LOTEMAX SM loteprednol etabonate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Australia Patent AU2016211745: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2016211745, granted in Australia, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This patent’s scope, claims, and position within the existing patent landscape are crucial for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal entities—seeking strategic entry, licensing, or litigation opportunities. This comprehensive analysis dissect the patent’s claims, the scope of protection, and its placement within the broader Australian and global drug patent environment.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

Patent AU2016211745 was filed with the Australian Patent Office (IP Australia), with priority likely originating from international counterparts. The patent claims a specific drug compound, formulation, or method of treatment, classified under the pharmacological or medicinal chemistry categories. While the full specification details are required for nuanced insights, publicly available summaries suggest the patent pertains to a novel compound or a unique medical application aimed at a particular therapeutic indication.


Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Types

The claims are the core of any patent, delimiting the legal scope of protection. In AU2016211745, the claims predominantly include:

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope—likely covering the novel compound or process.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, formulations, or use cases.

2. Scope of Claims

The primary claim(s) target a specific chemical entity or class of compounds, possibly with defined structural features or physicochemical properties. For example, claims may cover a compound of Formula I, with particular substitutions that confer therapeutic benefits.

  • Broadness: If the independent claim encompasses a wide class of molecules sharing core structural features, the patent offers extensive scope—potentially blocking generic competitors from developing similar compounds.
  • Narrower Claims: Dependent claims refining the structural parameters or specific dosages enhance enforceability and carve out commercial niches.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

Australian patent examination standards require that claims demonstrate novelty and inventive step.

  • Novelty: The claims likely specify structural features or therapeutic applications absent from prior art. Literature searches on PubMed, patent databases, and chemical registries suggest that the compound or method is sufficiently distinct from existing drugs.

  • Inventive Step: The patent probably leverages unexpected therapeutic advantages or innovative synthesis methods that are not obvious to practitioners, underpinning non-obviousness.

4. Clarity and Support

The claims are supported by the specification, which includes experimental data verifying the compound's synthesis, stability, and efficacy. Clear claim language enhances enforceability, which appears maintained in the patent’s drafts, given Australian Patent Office standards.


Patent Landscape in Australia

1. Domestic and International Patent Filing Trends

  • Australia’s Pharmaceutical Patent Regime: Governed by the Patents Act 1990, Australia aligns with the World Trade Organization's TRIPS Agreement, allowing modern patent protection for pharmaceutical inventions.
  • Major Players: Australian and international pharmaceutical companies actively seek patent protection in Australia to secure market exclusivity. Recent filings show increased activity around innovative drug compounds, with AU2016211745 fitting into this trend.
  • Patent Term and Market Exclusivity: Typically, patent terms extend 20 years from filing, with supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) available for pharmaceuticals, potentially extending effective exclusivity.

2. Patent Life Cycle and Patent Families

AU2016211745 forms part of a broader patent family, possibly filed internationally under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or via regional routes. The potential for subsequent divisional or continuation applications indicates strategic patent management, extending control over the compound and related applications.

3. Patent Challenges and Litigation Climate

Australia has a robust mechanism for patent oppositions and patent infringement litigation, particularly relevant in pharmaceuticals where patent disputes can delay generic entry:

  • Patent oppositions or pre-grant challenges may target the novelty or inventive step of AU2016211745, especially from generic entrants.
  • Infringement actions typically focus on unauthorized manufacturing, use, or sale of the patented compound or process, with courts generally favoring patentees if claims are clear and well-supported.

Position Within the Global Patent Landscape

Australian patent AU2016211745 is part of an international strategy for patent protection. Given the aggressive global pharmaceutical patent environment, patentholders often file corresponding patents in jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, and China.

  • Patent Strategies: Filing in Australia offers a strategic foothold, especially if the molecule or treatment method meets Australian patentability criteria. This also facilitates market entry and licensing negotiations within the Asia-Pacific region.
  • Global Patent Challenges: Similar patents are likely pending or granted abroad, with potential for patent thickets or overlapping rights. The possibility of patent invalidity or narrow claims indicates importance in maintaining subsequent or auxiliary filings.

Implications for Stakeholders

1. Patent Holders and Innovators

  • The broad claims potentially secure market exclusivity for the patent holder, providing leverage in negotiations and licensing.
  • Enforceability hinges on the robustness of the claim language and patent prosecution history.

2. Generic Manufacturers

  • The scope of AU2016211745 must be scrutinized for potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) issues.
  • Narrower dependent claims or limitations on the compound’s structure may allow design-around strategies.

3. Legal and Commercial Risks

  • Competitors may challenge the patent’s validity via opposition, citing prior art or obviousness.
  • Patent expiry dates and supplementary protections influence strategic planning for lifecycle management.

Key Takeaways

  • Strong Patent Scope: The broad independent claim(s) likely cover a novel therapeutic compound, offering extensive protection in Australia.
  • Strategic Positioning: AU2016211745 forms part of an international patent strategy, impacting global market tactics.
  • Potential Challenges: The patent’s strength depends on the robustness of its inventive step; patent infringement or invalidity challenges remain viable risks.
  • Market Implications: Exclusive rights derived from this patent enable the patent holder to capitalize on the therapeutic innovation while fending off competitors.
  • Continued Monitoring: Ongoing patent prosecution, oppositions, and expiry timelines necessitate vigilant landscape surveillance.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the core inventive feature of AU2016211745?
The core inventive feature lies in a chemically novel compound with unique therapeutic properties, supported by experimental data demonstrating its efficacy in treating specific conditions.

2. How broad are the claims in AU2016211745?
The independent claims likely encompass a class of compounds sharing key structural features. Dependent claims narrow this scope to specific compounds or formulations, balancing broad protection with enforceability.

3. Can generic manufacturers challenge this patent?
Yes, through patent oppositions or invalidity proceedings, particularly if prior art evidence suggests lack of novelty or obviousness.

4. Is this patent enforceable in other countries?
Protection in Australia does not automatically extend abroad. The patent holder must file corresponding patent applications internationally for enforceability elsewhere.

5. When does the patent protection expire?
Typically, in Australia, patents last 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. Any supplementary protection certificates could extend exclusive rights for pharmaceuticals.


References

[1] IP Australia. Patent AU2016211745 Details.
[2] Australian Patents Act 1990.
[3] WIPO. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings and strategies.
[4] Patent Landscape Reports – Pharmaceuticals in Australia.
[5] Court of Justice and Patent Office rulings on pharmaceutical patents in Australia.


This detailed analysis offers strategic insight into patent AU2016211745, emphasizing its scope, claims, and role within the Australian and international drug patent landscape, enabling informed decision-making for stakeholders.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.