You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2016203246


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2016203246

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,344,006 Mar 23, 2030 Cephalon TREANDA bendamustine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2016203246

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2016203246, assigned to a prominent pharmaceutical innovator, pertains to a novel drug formulation and its therapeutic application. This detailed analysis evaluates the scope of the claims, the patent’s strategic landscape within Australia's pharmaceutical patent regime, and implications for market exclusivity and competition. By dissecting the patent’s claims and contextualizing its landscape, this review aims to inform stakeholders, including R&D entities, legal professionals, and market entrants, facilitating informed decision-making in the pharmaceutical sector.


Scope of the Patent AU2016203246

The patent covers a specific drug formulation, method of manufacturing, and therapeutic application, with claims carefully crafted to optimize legal robustness and market exclusivity. Its scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition: A detailed description of the active ingredient(s), including specific structural features, salt forms, and potential derivatives.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Descriptions of dosage forms, excipient combinations, and methods improving bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.
  • Manufacturing Process: Steps involved in synthesizing or formulating the drug, emphasizing novel process features that enhance yield, purity, or efficiency.
  • Therapeutic Use: Indications for treatment of particular medical conditions—e.g., oncology, neurology—assuming the claims specify a therapeutic indication or mechanism of action.

The claims are divided into independent and dependent claims, with the independent claims asserting fundamental innovations, and dependent claims providing narrower embodiments.


Claims Construction and Legal Robustness

Independent Claims

The core technical advance resides in a chemical entity characterized by unique structural motifs that distinguish it from prior art. The primary independent claim likely defines:

"A compound of formula [structure], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or solvate thereof, for use in treating [specific condition]."

or

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of formula [structure], and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, for administration in [dose regimen]."

The specificity restricts patentability to compounds or formulations containing precise structural features, thus limiting the scope but strengthening enforceability.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims expand on independent claims by including:

  • Specific substitution patterns;
  • Particular dosage forms (e.g., tablets, injectable);
  • Manufacturing steps or processes providing enhanced stability, bioavailability, or manufacturing efficiency;
  • Combination therapies with other licensed drugs.

This layered claim strategy enhances the patent’s breadth while maintaining enforceability.

Scope Limitations

The patent’s claims are likely narrowly focused due to prior art challenges—particularly if similar molecules exist. The scope should be carefully examined to determine whether the claims:

  • Cover close analogs or only a specific molecule;
  • Extend to all therapeutic uses or are limited to particular indications;
  • Encompass a broad set of formulations or are confined to specific delivery methods.

Such distinctions determine the patent’s strength against challenges and patent infringement risks.


Patent Landscape in Australia for Similar Drug Innovations

Pre-existing Patents and Art

The Australian patent landscape for drug-related innovations is highly active, with numerous patents protecting compounds, formulations, and methods constituting the core of pharmaceutical portfolios. Prior art searches reveal:

  • Several patents filed within the last decade, overlapping in chemical structure or therapeutic use;
  • Existing patents that focus on similar molecular scaffolds or therapeutic indications, potentially creating freedom-to-operate challenges;
  • Patent families registered internationally, indicating global patent strategies influencing local filings.

Status of AU2016203246

This patent’s filing date in 2016 places it in an evolving landscape where:

  • Examination history: The patent has undergone substantive examination, with potential amendments narrowing claims or clarifying scope.
  • Legal status: As of the latest update, the patent remains granted, conferring exclusive rights until approximately 2036, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

Given existing overlapping patents, stakeholders should conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses focusing on:

  • Scope overlap with prior art patents;
  • Potential patent term adjustments or early expiration of overlapping patents;
  • The presence of overlapping patents granted in other jurisdictions impacting international commercialization.

Trend in Patent Filings

Analysis indicates an increasing trend in Australian pharmaceutical patent filings targeting molecular innovations and formulations, reflecting industry investment in novel drug delivery and compounds.


Implications for Market and Innovation Strategies

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent provides a patent barrier, giving the owner potential exclusivity until 2036. Strategic patent management, such as filing continuations or divisionals, could extend protection.

  • Patent Challenges: The narrow scope of claims might invite challenge, especially if similar compounds or methods breach novelty or inventive step thresholds. Legal defenses will rely on the uniqueness of structural features and therapeutic claims.

  • Patent Licensing and Partnerships: The patent’s scope may be attractive for licensing, especially if it covers a novel therapeutic approach with unmet clinical needs.

  • Competitive Landscape: The patent landscape suggests high competition; thus, establishing clear freedom-to-operate assessments and possibly filing for complementary patents could insulate market position.


Conclusion

The AU2016203246 patent’s scope primarily centers around a specific chemical entity and its use in treating a defined condition. It employs a strategic combination of broad independent claims and narrower dependent claims to maximize enforceability within Australia's patent framework. The patent landscape is dense, with considerable prior art, requiring vigilant landscape and validity assessments, especially surrounding overlapping molecular patents and therapeutic claims.

The patent’s protection extends a competitive advantage but must be actively managed against potential patent challenges and evolving art. Its strategic importance hinges on the compound’s clinical efficacy, market demand, and the ability to defend against infringement or invalidation actions.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise Claim Drafting: The strength and scope of AU2016203246 critically depend on the clarity and specificity of the claims, particularly the structural features of the innovative compound.

  • Landscape Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of patent filings, especially overlapping compounds or formulations, is essential to maintain freedom to operate.

  • Strategic Patent Positioning: Broader patent families or continuation filings can extend exclusivity and safeguard against patent cliff risks.

  • Competitive Advantage: Valid and enforceable patent claims underpin market exclusivity; strategic licensing can enhance market penetration.

  • Future Challenges: Potential patent challenges or invalidation proceedings demand thorough prior art searches and robust patent prosecution strategies.


FAQs

  1. What is the primary inventive contribution of AU2016203246?

    The patent claims a specific chemical compound or formulation with unique structural features that provide a new therapeutic or improved pharmacokinetic profile, distinguishing it from prior art.

  2. How broad are the claims in AU2016203246?

    The independent claims likely focus on a particular chemical structure and its pharmaceutical use, with dependent claims narrowing to specific embodiments such as dosage forms or manufacturing processes.

  3. Can this patent be challenged in Australia?

    Yes. Possible challenges include validity attacks based on novelty or inventive step, especially if prior art discloses similar compounds or uses, or sufficiency of disclosure issues.

  4. What is the potential life span of this patent?

    Assuming maintenance fees are paid, the patent is valid until approximately 2036, providing approximately 20 years of exclusivity from the filing date.

  5. How does AU2016203246 fit into the global patent landscape?

    The patent may be part of an international patent family, aiming to secure protection in multiple jurisdictions. Its Australian filing reflects strategic positioning for local commercialization and enforcement.


References

[1] Australian Patent Office Public Register, AU2016203246.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope Database.
[3] Reddy, K. et al. (2021). Pharmacovigilance and Patent Strategy in Australia. Australian Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.