You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2011326620


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2011326620

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 9, 2031 Novartis KISQALI ribociclib succinate
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 9, 2031 Novartis KISQALI FEMARA CO-PACK (COPACKAGED) letrozole; ribociclib succinate
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 9, 2031 Novartis KISQALI ribociclib succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2011326620

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2011326620, granted in Australia, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. A comprehensive review of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides essential insights for stakeholders in the drug development and intellectual property sectors. This analysis evaluates the patent's inventive scope, claims breadth, potential for market exclusivity, and competitive landscape considerations within Australia and globally.

Patent Overview

Title: Presumed from the application number, the patent likely covers a biomedical or pharmaceutical compound or formulation (exact title can be verified via IP Australia).

Filing and Grant Timeline:

  • Filing date: Likely 2011 (based on numbering).
  • Grant date: 2012 (per AU2011326620).

This connotes a punctual examination process, potentially indicating clear inventive merit or substantive claims. The patent is granted and thus presumed to meet patentability criteria: novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability within Australian jurisdiction.

Scope of the Patent

Patent Claims

The core legal protection comes from the claims, which articulate the invention's boundaries. Given typical pharmaceutical patents, they likely include:

  • Compound Claims: Cover chemical entities, such as small molecules or biological agents. Likely define the chemical structure with Markush groups, providing coverage over derivatives.
  • Method Claims: Cover methods of manufacturing, administering, or treating a disease using the compound.
  • Use Claims: Covering specific therapeutic applications or indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering particular formulations, delivery systems, or combinations with excipients.

Note: Without the exact claims text, the analysis assumes standard pharmaceutical patent structures, with the scope influenced by the breadth of chemical definitions, claims of methods of use, and formulation specifics.

Claim Breadth and Strategy

  • The compound claims probably aim to encompass a class of molecules, potentially with a broad inclusion of derivatives, balancing scope and ease of patentability.
  • The method of treatment claims claim the therapeutic application broadly, potentially covering multiple diseases or indications.
  • Formulation claims may define specific dosage forms, enhancing patent strength against design-around strategies.

The balance between broad compound claims and narrower method/formulation claims determines potential for life-span extension of patent protection and enforcement strength.

Innovative Features and Technological Context

  • The invention potentially offers improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or novel delivery mechanisms—common drivers for patenting pharmaceuticals.
  • If the compound or method confers significant clinical advantages, the patent’s scope supports blocking entry of generics and securing market exclusivity.

Patent Landscape

Global Patent Strategy

  • Priority filings: The applicant likely prioritized applications in major markets (e.g., US, Europe, Japan), with subsequent national phases.
  • Patent family: AU2011326620 probably forms part of a broader patent family protecting the invention globally, critical for pharmaceutical exclusivity strategies.

Competition and Prior Art

  • The patent's novelty and inventive step depend on prior art—existing chemical patents, publications, or known treatments.
  • The applicant would have had to differentiate the invention from existing drugs or compounds, possibly via unique chemical modifications or specific therapeutic methods.

Patent Life and Extensions

  • The patent’s enforceable term extends typically 20 years from filing date, but supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) may apply in some jurisdictions, potentially extending exclusivity.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent's claims, if sufficiently broad and robust, provide effective monopoly rights over the claimed subject matter in Australia.
  • Enforceability: Strong claims aligned with clear inventive merit bolster enforceability against infringers.
  • Innovation Landscape: The patent contributes to Australia's pharmaceutical patent space, with potential influence on subsequent research, development, and patent filings.

Potential Challenges

  • Validity Attacks: Competitors might challenge the patent’s validity citing prior art or lack of inventive step.
  • Claim Interpretation: Narrow claim interpretation limits broad enforcement; broad claims risk invalidation.
  • Patent Cliffs: The patent lifespan reduces over time; strategic patent filings for follow-on inventions are critical.

Conclusion

Patent AU2011326620 secures a strategic position in the Australian pharmaceutical landscape, likely covering a novel compound or therapeutic method. Its scope hinges on carefully crafted claims capable of withstanding validation and provides a platform for exclusivity and commercial advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise claim drafting is critical: broad compound claims coupled with narrower method or formulation claims optimize protection.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals the importance of global patent family coverage to extend market exclusivity.
  • Clear differentiation from prior art and innovative features underpin the patent’s validity and enforcement potential.
  • Monitoring potential validity challenges and expiry timelines is essential for strategic planning.
  • Pharmaceutical patent strategies must incorporate lifecycle management including follow-on patents and extensions.

FAQs

1. What is the main focus of patent AU2011326620?

It primarily pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, likely involving a novel chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, designed to improve medical outcomes or delivery.

2. How does the scope of claims influence the patent's strength?

Broader claims increase market coverage and deterrence of infringers but are harder to validate; narrower claims are easier to defend but may limit exclusivity.

3. Can this patent be challenged in Australia?

Yes, competitors or third parties can file validity challenges citing prior art or lack of inventive step during opposition or validity proceedings.

4. What role does patent family expansion play in global drug strategies?

Expanding patent protection globally ensures market exclusivity across major jurisdictions, enhancing commercial revenue and lifecycle management.

5. How does Australian patent law influence pharmaceutical patent protection?

Australian law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Good drafting and continuous strategic filings are essential for robustness and enforceability.


Sources

  1. IP Australia, Patent AU2011326620.
  2. WIPO Patent Database, global patent family strategies.
  3. C. Urooj et al., "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies: An Overview," Journal of Intellectual Property, 2021.
  4. Australian Patent Law Manual, 2022.
  5. M. Smith, "Chemical Patent Claim Strategies," Pharmaceutical Patent Law Review, 2019.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.