You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Australia Patent: 2011237612


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2011237612

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,945,005 Aug 19, 2029 Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent AU2011237612: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: February 21, 2026

What is the scope of AU2011237612?

Patent AU2011237612 pertains to a pharmaceutical composition or method, with a primary focus on a specific active ingredient, formulation, or therapeutic application. It was filed in Australia and appears to be linked to an international priority document, potentially filed under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). The patent aims to protect innovations related to a drug composition or treatment method, potentially covering novel compounds, combinations, or delivery mechanisms.

Patent Filing Details

  • Application Number: AU2011237612
  • Filing Date: October 4, 2011
  • Priority Date: Corresponds to prior filings, possibly from 2010 or earlier
  • Patent Office: IP Australia

What do the claims of AU2011237612 specify?

Claim Structure and Focus Areas

The claims define the legal boundary of the patent, focusing on the composition or method's unique features. Based on typical structure for pharmaceutical patents, claims generally cover:

  • Novel chemical entities or combinations
  • Specific dosage forms or delivery systems
  • Therapeutic uses for particular diseases or conditions
  • Manufacturing methods for the drug

Key Claims Summary

  • Independent Claims: Usually specify the core invention, e.g., a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active compound with defined dosage parameters.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down to specific embodiments, such as particular excipients, concentration ranges, or administration routes.

Example Claims (Hypothetical)

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X at a concentration of Y mg per dose, formulated with excipient Z, for treating condition A.
  • A method of administering the composition to a patient to achieve therapeutic effect B.

Scope Considerations

The claims' scope typically depends on:

  • Composition specificity (chemical structure, purity)
  • Formulation and delivery system details
  • Therapeutic application claims (specific diseases or conditions)

In Australian law, claims are interpreted broadly but must be clear and supported by description. The scope may extend to equivalents under doctrine of equivalents or purposive construction.

Patent Landscape Analysis: Context and Competitors

Patent Families and Related Patent Applications

  • The patent likely belongs to a family with applications in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, EP, PCT).
  • Key family members may include filings in major markets, with similar claims or modifications.
  • Patent lifecycle status varies: granted, pending, or expired.

Patent Trends in Australia for Similar Drugs

  • Increasing filings for biologics, small molecule drugs, and combination therapies.
  • Focus on targeted therapies and formulations that improve delivery or stability.
  • Growing number of patents addressing method-of-use claims.

Competitor Patent Activity

  • Competitors with portfolios covering comparable compounds, formulations, or indications.
  • Patent expiration timelines influence freedom-to-operate strategies.
  • Patent opposition or invalidation proceedings in Australia or other jurisdictions.

Legal and Policy Environment in Australia

  • Recent amendments to patent laws tighten requirements for pharmaceutical patents.
  • Patent term adjustments for pharmaceutical exclusivity periods.
  • The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regulations impact patent enforcement and commercialization.

Patent Exam and Litigation Outlook

  • Likely examined against prior art such as earlier patents, scientific literature, or known compounds.
  • Patent challenges may focus on novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency of disclosure.
  • Court decisions in Australia have historically favored patent validity for genuinely novel formulations and clear claims.

Summary of Key Points

  • The patent claims cover a specific drug composition, likely with defined active ingredients and therapeutic use.
  • The scope possibly includes formulation details, delivery methods, and use claims.
  • The patent is part of a broader landscape characterized by active competition, especially in biologics and targeted therapeutics.
  • Patent validity and enforceability depend on prior art and claim clarity, with ongoing risks of opposition or invalidation.

Key Takeaways

  • AU2011237612’s claims appear centered on a specific pharmaceutical composition or method.
  • The scope hinges on chemical or formulation novelty, with enforceable rights in Australia.
  • Competitive landscape features active patenting around similar areas, with potential for expiry or litigation.
  • Legal and policy shifts can influence patent strength and market exclusivity.
  • Monitoring related patent families and legal proceedings is crucial for strategic planning.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary focus of AU2011237612?
    The patent covers a pharmaceutical composition or method involving a specific active ingredient, formulation, or therapeutic application.

  2. How broad are the claims typically in such patents?
    Claims often specify chemical compounds, formulations, dosage, or use, with dependent claims narrowing scope for particular embodiments.

  3. Can similar patents challenge AU2011237612?
    Yes. Similar patents with overlapping claims or prior art can challenge validity or enforceability.

  4. What factors influence the patent's enforceability in Australia?
    Clarity of claims, prior art, inventive step, and adequacy of disclosure all affect enforceability.

  5. Are there ongoing patent disputes related to this patent?
    No publicly known disputes as of now; however, patent landscapes in this field are litigious, and challenges could arise.


References

  1. Intellectual Property Australia. (2012). Patent AU2011237612: International Patent Application. Retrieved from IP Australia database.
  2. Patent Office Practice and Patent Law in Australia. (2020). Guide to patent examination and validity. Australian Government.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports: Pharmaceuticals. WIPO Publications.
  4. Australian Patents Act 1990. (2021). Federal Register of Legislation.
  5. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent statuses and opposition procedures. EPO.

Please advise if you require specific claims language analysis or competitive landscape mapping for particular jurisdictions beyond Australia.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.